On 02/07/2017 09:00 PM, Joel Nothman wrote:
On 12 January 2017 at 08:51, Gael Varoquaux
<gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org <mailto:gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org>>
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:41:51AM +1100, Joel Nothman wrote:
> When the two versions deprecation policy was instituted,
releases were much
> more frequent... Is that enough of an excuse?
I'd rather say that we can here decide that we are giving a longer
grace
period.
I think that slow deprecations are a good things (see titus's blog
post
here:
http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/2017-pof-software-archivability.html
<http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/2017-pof-software-archivability.html> )
Given that 0.18 was a very slow release, and the work for removing
deprecated material from 0.19 has already been done, I don't think we
should revert that. I agree that we can delay the deprecation deadline
for 0.20 and 0.21.
In terms of release schedule, are we aiming for RC in early-mid March,
assuming Andy's above prognostications are correct and he is able to
review in a bigger way in a week or so?
Sometimes I wonder how Amazon ever gave me a job in forecasting....
Spring break is March 13-17th ;)
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
