> Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems to be running the show?
Mostly running behind the show ... For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of introduction planned on Monday. For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and I think that we can propose a schedule such that we can be efficient. IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me. Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that some issues could be packed together. I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki directly and I think that having it before Monday could be better. Let me know how I can help. On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, sounds good. > I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but doing some google form > or similar seems a bit heavy-handed? > Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems to > be running the show? > > On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote: > > I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just a few people. > > I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we schedule specific > topics at this point? > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing > listscikit-learn@python.orghttps://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > -- Guillaume Lemaitre INRIA Saclay - Parietal team Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay https://glemaitre.github.io/
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
