Thanks for bringing that up.
Did I email travis last time?
We should also follow up with Microsoft as they promised unlimited builds...
On 2/20/19 3:48 AM, Alexandre Gramfort wrote:
we should also see if we can have a lot of CI machines for the 5 days
as it's always the blocker to move fast during 1 week.
my 2c
Alex
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:35 AM Roman Yurchak via scikit-learn
<scikit-learn@python.org> wrote:
Thanks for putting the draft schedule together!
Personally I will be there 3 days out of 5 and wouldn't want to miss the
discussion on euclidean distance issues. Maybe we could adjust the
schedule during the sprint (say on Tuesday) based on people's interest
and availability? That might be easier than trying to figure it out for
29 participants over email..
Also IMO it would makes sense to have some discussions (that are not
that controversial or about high level API but still useful) earlier
during the week to be able to work on them during the sprint.
--
Roman
On 20/02/2019 02:30, Joel Nothman wrote:
I don't think I'll be able to stay for the Friday 10am discussion, but
have a PR open on "efficient grid search" so should probably be involved.
Perhaps the fit_transform discussion can happen without you, Andy?
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 10:17, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com
<mailto:t3k...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I put a draft schedule here:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule
it's obviously somewhat opinionated ;)
Happy to reprioritize.
Basically I wouldn't like to miss any of the big API discussions
because coming late to the party.
The two things on (grid?) searches are somewhat related: one is
about specifying search-spaces, the other about executing a given
search space efficiently. They probably warrant separate discussions.
I haven't added plotting or sample props on it, which are maybe two
other discussion points.
I tried to cover most controversial things from the roadmap.
Not sure if discussing the schedule via the mailing list is the best
way? Don't want to create even more traffic than I already am ;)
On 2/19/19 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lemaître wrote:
> Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that
he seems to be running the show?
Mostly running behind the show ...
For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of
introduction planned on Monday.
For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and I think
that we can propose a schedule such that we can be efficient.
IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me.
Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that some issues
could be packed together.
I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki
directly and I think that having it before Monday could be better.
Let me know how I can help.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com
<mailto:t3k...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yeah, sounds good.
I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but doing some
google form or similar seems a bit heavy-handed?
Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that
he seems to be running the show?
On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote:
I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just a few
people.
I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we schedule
specific topics at this point?
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
--
Guillaume Lemaitre
INRIA Saclay - Parietal team
Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay
https://glemaitre.github.io/
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn