we should also see if we can have a lot of CI machines for the 5 days as it's always the blocker to move fast during 1 week.
my 2c Alex On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:35 AM Roman Yurchak via scikit-learn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for putting the draft schedule together! > > Personally I will be there 3 days out of 5 and wouldn't want to miss the > discussion on euclidean distance issues. Maybe we could adjust the > schedule during the sprint (say on Tuesday) based on people's interest > and availability? That might be easier than trying to figure it out for > 29 participants over email.. > > Also IMO it would makes sense to have some discussions (that are not > that controversial or about high level API but still useful) earlier > during the week to be able to work on them during the sprint. > > -- > Roman > > On 20/02/2019 02:30, Joel Nothman wrote: > > I don't think I'll be able to stay for the Friday 10am discussion, but > > have a PR open on "efficient grid search" so should probably be involved. > > > > Perhaps the fit_transform discussion can happen without you, Andy? > > > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 10:17, Andreas Mueller <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I put a draft schedule here: > > > > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule > > > > it's obviously somewhat opinionated ;) > > Happy to reprioritize. > > Basically I wouldn't like to miss any of the big API discussions > > because coming late to the party. > > > > The two things on (grid?) searches are somewhat related: one is > > about specifying search-spaces, the other about executing a given > > search space efficiently. They probably warrant separate discussions. > > > > I haven't added plotting or sample props on it, which are maybe two > > other discussion points. > > I tried to cover most controversial things from the roadmap. > > > > Not sure if discussing the schedule via the mailing list is the best > > way? Don't want to create even more traffic than I already am ;) > > > > On 2/19/19 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lemaître wrote: > >> > Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that > >> he seems to be running the show? > >> > >> Mostly running behind the show ... > >> > >> For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of > >> introduction planned on Monday. > >> For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and I think > >> that we can propose a schedule such that we can be efficient. > >> IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me. > >> > >> Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that some issues > >> could be packed together. > >> I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki > >> directly and I think that having it before Monday could be better. > >> > >> Let me know how I can help. > >> > >> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, sounds good. > >> I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but doing some > >> google form or similar seems a bit heavy-handed? > >> Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that > >> he seems to be running the show? > >> > >> On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote: > >>> I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just a few > >>> people. > >>> > >>> I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we schedule > >>> specific topics at this point? > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> scikit-learn mailing list > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> scikit-learn mailing list > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Guillaume Lemaitre > >> INRIA Saclay - Parietal team > >> Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay > >> https://glemaitre.github.io/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> scikit-learn mailing list > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > > > > _______________________________________________ > > scikit-learn mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > > > > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn _______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
