well, i guess i can tell you what my expirence has shown me. in the past, it seemed to me and others i associated with, that the only interviewers who wanted to know about the certs, or even "required" them usually were ignorant to the technology field. the cert showed them this guy/gal really knows their stuff. we gotta hire them. as Ted stated, i am not putting anyone down, i like to see certs too, but i really do believe they put way too much emphasis on them. most people i worked with that took the MS certs, just downloaded the exams and crammed and took it, and guess what, they passed! and of course a week later, they forgot 80% of what they were just tested on. but they didnt care, because they had the cert, and these ignorant businesses will hire them becasue of it, only later to regret that.
of course this isnt 100% true, there are people who have certs that really know their stuff. that impresses me, but most do not. i have some certs.. Certified NetWare Engineer, MCP, and A+. i only took the A+ to have the cert, of course I didnt study for it becasue i already knew it. the MCP i also knew, but stop pursuing the MSCE because I was disgusted with everybody and their dog cramming and examming. the CNE, i took a class for and successfully passed the cert.
I agree with the statement about getting the A+ if you are an entry level job seeker. it will help, however on a higher end job, it is almost a waste of time to put on a resume with all the other certs and expirence that need that same space.
I am sorry, but I am desparately looking for a job. i am unemployed and it is no treat. so forgive me for ranting about certs and employers who only hire certified people becasue they are the only ones who know what they are doing. i call BS. once again, sorry.
I do agree as far as interviewing, certs help. i wish i had more.
Daniel


Jason Newman wrote:

I agree to an extent. I have been on numerous job interviews and I have
never been on one that doesn't inquire about certifications. Anyone can put
so many years of experience on a resume, but having the associated
certification to go with it is proof. I know people that worked as a
technical person for years and all they did was change tapes and maybe swap
out a keyboard now and then, yet they can proclaim having a technical job.
When potential employers call your previous or current employer the only
information that can be given is dates of employment and job titles. That
doesn't tell the employer too much. However when you have the
certifications, they can verify these. Some people may think anyone can pass
a test and get a certification but they are missing a few critical points
that employers look for.

A certification not only shows you can study for a test and pass it. It also
shows that you have enough ambition to attempt to better yourself. It shows
that you can still learn. It shows that you are still interested in your
line of work. These are just a few.

You can ask any employer that if he\she had two resumes sitting in front of
them both having the same amount of experience but one having certifications
along with the experience, they would call the certified person first or at
a minimum they are going to stick out from the other individual.

I don't only get certified to show my expertise in a specific area, I get
certified to beat out the other person sitting in the waiting room applying
for the same job. And 9 out of 10 times that can do it. Don't get me wrong
the experience is far more important than any certification, but coupled
with certifications is your best bet.

Jason


-----Original Message----- From: Mike Schieuer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sclug-generallist] certs


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

I couldn't agree with you more Ted.  I was just going to sit and watch the
conversation.  But, it's time to jump in.  If any thing SOHK (School Of Hard
Knocks) is the only cert I've ever needed.  If I'm going to spend money or
have my company spend money on training I'd look into something like Pine
Mountain Group training www.pmg.com.   Which is true network
troubleshooting.
We've purchased their training cd's and these sessions are amazing.  They
push getting back to fundamentals and take troubleshooting to a defined
approach.  I think that "being certified" has gone a little far.  I know
people who still talk about being Netware certified.  Anyone can take a
test,
but it's putting that knowledge to use 6 months after that test has come and
gone.


Mike




On Tuesday 30 December 2003 14:02, Ted Kat. wrote:


I was under the impression that certs are a joke (unless your a M$ OEM)
A number of people in the biz, both the high ups and low level, have
toldme that any MCSE || MCSA certs don't prove anything more than you
can point and click. Not to put down anyone who has those certs as I
too have the work sheets and books for the Server certs.

I have come to realize that experience working with the Open Source
community caries more weight than any cert.(unless it was some
elitist certification where there are only three people who
could pass it)

I would love to be proved wrong. So that I could get as many as
possible
and finally get a good job.



=====
Ted Katseres

------------------------------------------------
------  C , C++, Java or Cobol -------
------   Linux doesn't care -------------
------------------------------------------------

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
http://search.yahoo.com/top2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/8fe/mUFtrUUciv4RAumAAJ40PPrkbzUSRMov4OWOBKmUJoH0OQCffyjk
Ree8F/q+zaIkpmAQFwGkR3s=
=QQD8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----







Reply via email to