On Apr 16, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Mark J. Nelson wrote: > > Different Eric. Eric Saxe. Sorry, I was assuming he was involved, > as the merge changeset that tripped over this problem was his. I > meant "whoever tried to clone this project repository."
Ah, right. > If the zfs snapshot is just the repo in question, that's fine, > otherwise a tarball would be great. The 30-day rollback would be > insufficient, as the problem was actually introduced when merging > the project gate to onnv_82. If it's is only the powertop repo in question, then we'll have to go with the tarball since repos are organized by projects which are each a dataset with the repos living inside them. I offered the month rollback just in case it was a bit more recent. Where's the best place to put the tarball? e.
