>> If the zfs snapshot is just the repo in question, that's fine, >> otherwise a tarball would be great. The 30-day rollback would be >> insufficient, as the problem was actually introduced when merging the >> project gate to onnv_82.
> If it's is only the powertop repo in question, then we'll have to go > with the tarball since repos are organized by projects which are each a > dataset with the repos living inside them. I offered the month rollback > just in case it was a bit more recent. > > Where's the best place to put the tarball? Ok. I wasn't even sure if it was the powertop repo; that info was gone from the e-mail before I started looking. Anyplace on-SWAN that I can get to should be fine. --Mark