>> If the zfs snapshot is just the repo in question, that's fine, 
>> otherwise a tarball would be great.  The 30-day rollback would be 
>> insufficient, as the problem was actually introduced when merging the 
>> project gate to onnv_82.

> If it's is only the powertop repo in question, then we'll have to go 
> with the tarball since repos are organized by projects which are each a 
> dataset with the repos living inside them. I offered the month rollback 
> just in case it was a bit more recent.
> 
> Where's the best place to put the tarball?

Ok.  I wasn't even sure if it was the powertop repo; that info was gone 
from the e-mail before I started looking.

Anyplace on-SWAN that I can get to should be fine.

--Mark

Reply via email to