Mark J. Nelson wrote: > >>> If the zfs snapshot is just the repo in question, that's fine, >>> otherwise a tarball would be great. The 30-day rollback would be >>> insufficient, as the problem was actually introduced when merging the >>> project gate to onnv_82. > >> If it's is only the powertop repo in question, then we'll have to go >> with the tarball since repos are organized by projects which are each >> a dataset with the repos living inside them. I offered the month >> rollback just in case it was a bit more recent. >> >> Where's the best place to put the tarball? > > Ok. I wasn't even sure if it was the powertop repo; that info was gone > from the e-mail before I started looking. > > Anyplace on-SWAN that I can get to should be fine. > > --Mark
I believe it would be okay with us (the powertop team) to simply re-create the repository, if the problem is root caused and you feel there's no need to chase this issue down. We're currently in sync with ON. Rafael
