Mark J. Nelson wrote: > Elaine Ashton wrote: >> >> On Apr 16, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Rafael Vanoni wrote: >>> >>> I believe it would be okay with us (the powertop team) to simply >>> re-create the repository, if the problem is root caused and you feel >>> there's no need to chase this issue down. We're currently in sync >>> with ON. >> >> I don't have a problem with that as it's likely the easiest way to go >> if you want to try it. > > I'll leave this up to the project team. > > If they want, I can take some time to work on helping them preserve > history from the project gate. This will almost certainly look like > "recreating every changeset from the onnv_82 merge onwards," most of > which is pretty trivial, but the merges (one each for onnv_82 through > onnv_113? I didn't check) will probably be manual, using info from an > old repository and checking that they resolve the same. > > Or you can go the route of "new repo cloned from onnv_113," and go from > there. In that case, I would assume that y'all will handle things > yourselves. > > Please (Rafael), let me know either way.
I talked to the other powertop developers and we're fine with re-creating the repo from scratch. Thanks for looking into this folks. Rafael
