Stephen Hahn writes:
> > While for a change to slim_install or pkg-gate it would be valid, it's
> > absolutely wrong for others. The other alternative I can think of
> > (baking that knowledge into the code) is untenable, I think.
> >
> > If there's another way to go about it, I'm open to suggestions.
>
> (I may have missed some context on what the checks are doing for bug
> lookups; apologies if the following is redundant.)
>
> Why couldn't we define a syntax for defect. bugs, like "[0-9]+o", and
> match/check both that and the "[1-9][0]9]{5}" pattern for Bugster?
That's exactly what I was asking for.
> I agree that the tools shouldn't know about any specific
> gates/projects.
Agreed. I think Rich's real concern here is that
"defect.opensolaris.org" is somehow "not official yet."
My point of view is that it's only "not official" because we're
continuing to treat it that way. Everything else in terms of due
diligence (similar to the choice of Mercurial) has already been done.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
