Richard Lowe writes: > Stephen Hahn <sch at sun.com> writes: > > Yes, and various Sun-specific steps we took during the DSCM change > > have been completed/accepted for this change. So, if it's any > > reassurance, it's getting to be more and more official. But I guess > > what's being asked for is a complete picture, which I don't personally > > have (beyond believing that we're in the two systems phase mentioned > > in the DTS requirements). > > Well, the best I can say is "Nobody actually told me that until just > now". If that's the case, I'm fine with this. I'm taking that to > mean that the C-Teams and such are happy with bugs filed in d.o.o and > not bugster being integrated into their various consolidations, etc, > etc, etc.
It likely doesn't mean that *until* the webrti bits catch up. But someone surely must go first. ;-} > My argument was based on the information I had, which was us not yet > being at that point. > > Either way, if either you or Jim file an RFE (on grommit, I assume), > we'll get to it as priorities dictate no doubt. I'll file an RFE on grommit. I think the priority should be normal, and the target should probably be post-tools-putback. If it happens before that time, I'd be thrilled, but it's only really required for the external webrti tool. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
