>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes:
Mike> - The named branch check looks like it just checks the name of the Mike> current branch. So it wouldn't catch the case where somebody commits Mike> something on a new branch, goes back to using the default branch, and Mike> then merges with the new branch. Is there some way to review the Mike> entries in the active list and see if any of them belong to a branch Mike> other than "default"? Rich> But then they'd trip the multi-head check. Even if the non-default branch got merged back into the default branch? mike
