Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer at sun.com> writes: >>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes: > > Rich> Well, my understanding is that the attempt is to make sure the > Rich> default branch does not change names, which I don't think would > Rich> happen in that case. > > I think we want to verify these things: > > - no changesets added on any non-default branch
Ah, we're attempting to deal with the intentional existance of other branches in the gate. That does complicate things, yes. For the sake of clarity (for me, at least). Is this certainly how we intend to manage the build snapshots at this point? If so, do we have the facility to actually figure out how well that works in practice? We seem to have stopped generating bundles containing the respun changes (and thus the branch that would be there). -- Rich
