>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes:
Rich> Well, my understanding is that the attempt is to make sure the Rich> default branch does not change names, which I don't think would Rich> happen in that case. I think we want to verify these things: - no changesets added on any non-default branch - default branch not renamed (assuming that's even possible) - user does not have a non-default branch selected mike
