On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 08:46 +0100, Oliver Schäfer wrote: > >> All changes have been made to fix/add code and not to break existing > >> one. > > > > Why were categorizeVDD and integration_get_vdd changed ? > > Where you aiming just at cleanups or was something broken ? > > The bz3 part was broken, and as I said never worked, although we had > code for it. I've tested those functions heavily, so every change has > its sense and meanwhile I've made some cleanups and code reviews.
Thanks. I just applied the changes related to these two functions.
> >>> - I'll need to edit integration_change_bug_resolution() for style
> >
> > Is it possible to add some more documentation in this function ?
> Surely. I'll revisit it in the next days, I'm quite busy until
> Friday, is this weekend OK for you?
Sure. Thanks.
> >
> >>> changes. I hope I won't break... much. One question: How is case
> >>> sensitivity of resolutions handled ?
> Oh yes we do:
> /^resolved$/ && do {
> $resolution = lc $resolution;
This was my mistake. I realized now that in the other cases, e.g.
"assigned", "reopened" the resolution is not used at all.
When you rerun your test cases, can you set resolutions and status that
aren't all in lowercase ? e.g. "Resolved", "fiXED", etc. Would it be a
good idea to set all resolution test data in such mixed-case ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
