This indicates that an activity_commit was processed within one second. How about the activity_verify before it ?
Also, can you check how long it takes to commit if you disable the glue in glue.conf ? On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 14:04 -0500, Brian Marshall wrote: > The daemon log is fairly uninteresting; It has many lines that look > like the following: > > 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> > Daemon.pm:658:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::connection_handler_thread - > 127.0.0.1:6701 Processing connection from > 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> > Process.pm:867:Scmbug::Daemon::Process::process_activity_commit - > 127.0.0.1:6701 Processing an 'activity_commit' for bug id '2' from SCM > user 'marshallb' > 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> > Daemon.pm:673:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::connection_handler_thread - > 127.0.0.1:6701 Connection from processed > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Kristis Makris <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Please send all communication to the mailing list. > > > > How about the logs ? > > > > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 13:34 -0500, Brian Marshall wrote: > >> I am using SVN. I am not sure of the version but we just installed > >> the lastest about a month ago. > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Kristis Makris <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Which SCM system are you integrating ? I'm wondering if this is an issue > >> > with CVS and the policy to consolidate cvs log messages. > >> > > >> > Also, if you look at activity.log, is there an indication of how long it > >> > takes from the time an activity_verify is issued until an > >> > activity_commit is issued ? The logs should have timestamps. > >> > > >> > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:24 -0500, Brian Marshall wrote: > >> >> I am using scmbug 0.26.9 and bugzilla 3.0.6 on Windows system. > >> >> > >> >> Since integrating scmbug, my commits take a very long time (on the > >> >> order of 30 seconds). I am pretty sure I just need to tweak a setting > >> >> or two on the server or Bugzilla database. > >> >> > >> >> Does anyone have any tips on how to do this? Or where I should > >> >> starting looking for the bottleneck? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Brian > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> scmbug-users mailing list > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > scmbug-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
