On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Kristis Makris <[email protected]> wrote: > This indicates that an activity_commit was processed within one second. > > How about the activity_verify before it ?
2008/12/19 10:22:05 Scmbug WARN> Daemon.pm:658:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::connection_handler_thread - 127.0.0.1:6699 Processing connection from 2008/12/19 10:22:05 Scmbug WARN> Process.pm:886:Scmbug::Daemon::Process::process_activity_verify - 127.0.0.1:6699 Processing an 'activity_verify' for bug id '2' from SCM user 'marshallb' 2008/12/19 10:22:06 Scmbug WARN> Daemon.pm:673:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::connection_handler_thread - 127.0.0.1:6699 Connection from processed 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> Daemon.pm:658:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::connection_handler_thread - 127.0.0.1:6701 Processing connection from 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> Process.pm:867:Scmbug::Daemon::Process::process_activity_commit - 127.0.0.1:6701 Processing an 'activity_commit' for bug id '2' from SCM user 'marshallb' 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> Daemon.pm:673:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::connection_handler_thread - 127.0.0.1:6701 Connection from processed > > Also, can you check how long it takes to commit if you disable the glue > in glue.conf ? With enabled=>0 the commit happens in < 2 seconds. > > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 14:04 -0500, Brian Marshall wrote: >> The daemon log is fairly uninteresting; It has many lines that look >> like the following: >> >> 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> >> Daemon.pm:658:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::connection_handler_thread - >> 127.0.0.1:6701 Processing connection from >> 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> >> Process.pm:867:Scmbug::Daemon::Process::process_activity_commit - >> 127.0.0.1:6701 Processing an 'activity_commit' for bug id '2' from SCM >> user 'marshallb' >> 2008/12/19 10:22:25 Scmbug WARN> >> Daemon.pm:673:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::connection_handler_thread - >> 127.0.0.1:6701 Connection from processed >> >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Kristis Makris <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Please send all communication to the mailing list. >> > >> > How about the logs ? >> > >> > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 13:34 -0500, Brian Marshall wrote: >> >> I am using SVN. I am not sure of the version but we just installed >> >> the lastest about a month ago. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Kristis Makris <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Which SCM system are you integrating ? I'm wondering if this is an issue >> >> > with CVS and the policy to consolidate cvs log messages. >> >> > >> >> > Also, if you look at activity.log, is there an indication of how long it >> >> > takes from the time an activity_verify is issued until an >> >> > activity_commit is issued ? The logs should have timestamps. >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:24 -0500, Brian Marshall wrote: >> >> >> I am using scmbug 0.26.9 and bugzilla 3.0.6 on Windows system. >> >> >> >> >> >> Since integrating scmbug, my commits take a very long time (on the >> >> >> order of 30 seconds). I am pretty sure I just need to tweak a setting >> >> >> or two on the server or Bugzilla database. >> >> >> >> >> >> Does anyone have any tips on how to do this? Or where I should >> >> >> starting looking for the bottleneck? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Brian >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> scmbug-users mailing list >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users >> >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> scmbug-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users > _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
