Why is Bugtracker.pm modified ? I see no reason for the changes applied there.
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 22:42 +0300, Elias Balasis wrote: > Modifications for comment handling (AppendComment) definitely work for > any version above 3.1.2 > > Modifications for version checking are tested with all Bugzilla > installations from 3.0.0 to 3.4.1 > > > > Unfortunately no resources for QA here J > > No, I haven’t tested with actual 3.2 for comment handling > (Bugzilla::Bug::AppendComment) modifications > > BUT I checked ONE BY ONE every Bugzilla distribution from 3.0.0 to > 3.4.1 > > Found out that all Bugzilla versions above 3.1.2 do not use > Bugzilla::Bug::AppendComment but Bugzilla::Bug::add_comment instead > > My modification specifically handles this case and since all Bugzilla > versions above 3.1.2 use same function for same purpose > (Bugzilla::Bug::add_comment) > > the patch is expected to work for all Bugzilla versions above 3.1.2 > > > > Attached modified files for convenience (against scmbug 0-26-15) > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:47 PM > To: Elias Balasis > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [scmbug-users] scmbug with Bugzila 3.4.1 and SVN > > > > > Elia, please send all communication to the mailing list. > > Which versions of Bugzilla has this work been tested with ? You > indicated it applies to Bugzilla 3.2 later, but also that you aimed to > get it to work with Bugzilla 3.4.1. Have you tested it with 3.2 ? > > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:40 +0300, Elias Balasis wrote: > > Find attached the modified files. > > Contained modifications apply to Bugzilla 3.2 or later > > (Bugzilla::Bug::AppendComment function removed in Bugzilla 3.1.2) > > Also added support for more flexible version checking > > Modifications were performed against Scmbug 0-26-15 (handling all > > AppendComment cases, duplicates etc.) > > > > You can use the attached files to extract the modifications against > > scmbug 0-26-15 > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Kristis > Makris<[email protected]> wrote: > > > Elias, > > > > > > Can you supply a patch ? > > > > > > Which version of Scmbug were these produced against ? > > > > > > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 01:02 +0300, Elias Balasis wrote: > > >> Kristis Makris, > > >> > > >> please check the modifications in previously attached files. > > >> They worked for me quite successfully and I believe they would > make an > > >> excellent addition to scmbug implementation > > >> Please consider including in next version of scmbug > > >> (re-ataching for convenience) you can extract a patch and compare > accordingly > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Kristis > Makris<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Hi Ben, > > >> > > > >> > Some ideas are in: > > >> > > > >> > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1422 > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 14:04 -0700, Ben wrote: > > >> >> Has anyone tried to use scmbug with Bugzila 3.4.1 and SVN? > > >> >> > > >> >> I keep getting following error. > > >> >> > > >> >> ******************************************* > > >> >> 2009/08/24 15:56:06 Scmbug WARN> > > >> >> Daemon.pm:81:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::read_configuration - Read > > >> >> configuration file '/etc/scmbug/daemon.conf' > > >> >> 2009/08/24 15:56:06 Scmbug ERROR> > > >> >> Daemon.pm:114:Scmbug::Daemon::Daemon::read_configuration - > > >> >> ******************************************* > > >> >> ** > > >> >> ** > > >> >> ** Scmbug error 79: Unsupported version '3.4.1'. This could be > because > > >> >> this version was never tested. If you use a different version > number > > >> >> and manage to get the integration working correctly please > notify > > >> >> '[email protected]'. > > >> >> Initialization of bug-tracking system 'Bugzilla' version > '3.4.1' > > >> >> failed. This could be due to an unsupported version of this > system, or > > >> >> misconfiguration. > > >> >> ** > > >> >> ** > > >> >> ******************************************* > > >> >> > > >> >> Any ideas on configuration to make it work? > > >> >> > > >> >> Thanks and regadrs, > > >> >> > > >> >> Ben > > >> >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > > >> >> scmbug-users mailing list > > >> >> [email protected] > > >> >> http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> > scmbug-users mailing list > > >> > [email protected] > > >> > http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
