Hmmm, now I remember.
What I had in mind was a mixture of "is_version_up_to_...." and "is_version_above_..." checks (I initially created an is_version_above_3_1_2 check for the Bugzilla::Bug::AppendComment problem) Under such a mixture more than one "is_version_..." checks may be "True" (Was trying to think ahead) I agree, currently only one "is_version_..." check is expected to be "True" Still, the modification is expected to work for both simple (current) and future (mixture) scenarios If you consider this inappropriate or unnecessary you can replace the "version_type_..." variables with a common one (version_type) (As it was in scmbug 0-26-15) _____ From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 8:13 PM To: Elias Balasis Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [scmbug-users] scmbug with Bugzila 3.4.1 and SVN On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 20:04 +0300, Elias Balasis wrote: > It is updated for "is_version_..." function adaptation to the newly > introduced version checking mechanism Why is a newly introduced version checking mechanism needed ? Why can't we check if the version we are looking for is a particular version ? like is_version_up_to_3_00(), or is_version_up_to_3_20(). ? > So, I changed the general version checking mechanism and made it support > multiple version checks It was supporting multiple version checks already. So why change it ? I don't see the reason yet.
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
