On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Guillaume Cottenceau <gcott...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> You've chosen your own > >> numbering (2.201) and to keep the original name, so for > >> outside/distribution people it looks like just a normal upgrade (I > >> already got that echo from Mandriva). > > > > We call it Games::FrozenBubble too close? > > I think so, yes. "Games" for people has just no meaning since it looks > like a categorizing part. And "FrozenBubble" is exactly the same name > except the - separator in the middle of the original name. That said, > I cannot suggest a very good name change and it also would imply some > graphics changes. So I'd favor a bold explanation on your releases. > > > >> If there are any problems with > >> your releases in stable distributions, I would not like to be > >> associated with these problems, and for that I'd appreciate a naming > >> change, I think "ported to CPAN" is probably not enough. I think the > >> most simple would be to not do releases, leaving me some (reasonable > >> amount of) time so that we try to agree on a common codebase and > >> acceptable planning for the future. > > > > We can hold back on releases for sure. That is not too hard to do :). > > Great. Can you already add a bold statement in current release stating > it's not (yet) an official upgrade to original Frozen-Bubble game? > > Ok we can make a tiny release to update this as you say. > > >> By reasonable time, I can offer a > >> serious review of your branch this week already and then some more > >> work if needed in the following weeks. > > > > No worries take as much time as you need. > > Thanks - but it would not be fair to your work to take a lot of time, > so I'll try to act this week already. > Thanks > > > >> By acceptable planning, I think > >> that everything which you'd plan to do which wouldn't hurt our > >> original view of the game (including its stability for example) would > >> be totally fine (for example, your refactoring plans); since we didn't > >> plan many more developments and it's open source, it's normal others > >> people could improve the software if they want to do; however, my only > >> limit would be if you chose to implement things I'm strongly against > >> to see in FB, then I'd ask for a name change. > > > > We haven't made any logic changes in FB at all. Just porting. > > We could later fix bugs but there is no game play changes in mind. > > Ok. > > Thanks, > > -- > Guillaume Cottenceau - http://zarb.org/~gc/ <http://zarb.org/%7Egc/> >
