[freenet-support] Windows Installation problem
Hi everyone, Just tried to install v0.7 on windows 2000, and am having problems. I already have freenet 0.5 installed, which I want to keep running, but while I was installing 0.7 (to a different directory), it was stopped. Anyway, I left the installer to install everything listed, and it got to the part where it has to download bits, and it complained with something like plugin already installed or something similar, with only a quit button active. (I'm afraid I didn't write it down at the time as I thought it was just a warning). Why would this happen on a vanilla install? Also, how do I uninstall it properly and start again? From the parent directory, java -jar Freenet7\Uninstaller\uninstaller.jar brought up an uninstall dialog, but pressing the uninstall button didn't seem to do anything, yet, rerunning the installer warns me about installing another instance of freenet. Any ideas? Thanks, MrFlibble ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet (0.5, Build 5106) has trouble with time transitions
It happened before, and it happened again tonight. I got woken up by alarms indicating 100 % CPU usage, and found out it was being caused by Freenet, so I restarted it. Obviously it has problems when summer/winter time transitions occur. It's only twice a year, but thought I should mention it. Ah! That would explain why mine crashed too last night! ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Temporary files error
Just got the following message when trying to load a freesite: Temporary files error Error: Internal temp files error, maybe disk full or permissions problem?: null My node has been running for several hours, and I have 515mb free on one drive, and 300gb free on another, so this shouldn't be the issue. None of the permissions will have changed as I have been browsing other freesites this morning without any problem and without changing anything on my freenet machine. Any ideas? Thanks, ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 995 - auto update not working
Freenet 0.7 build 996 is now available. Please upgrade. My node doesn't seem to want to update itself. For the last 2 days, I've had the following displayed on my fproxy homepage: It seems that your node isn't running the latest version of the software. Your node is currently fetching the update over Freenet. Once this is complete, you will be prompted to install the new version. Please be patient, this could take up to half an hour. At the moment, 6 of my connected peers are running 996, together with 2 backed off and 1 disconnetd node. Any idea why it's not downloaded it? It has updated itself from build 990 onwards within an hour or so without problems. MrFlibble ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 995 - auto update not working
Updating manually worked although had to try twice cos it hadn't shut the service down before it tried overwriting freenet.jar and truncated it to 0 bytes it the first time I ran it. Had to stop the service manually and then run update.cmd before it would work. Also, since 994 (I think), queing download via the web interface doesn't seem to keep the filenames associated with the CHK keys, where it worked perfectly before. Is this connected to the the problems with chk/filename begin... thread? Thanks, MrFlibble -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of toad Sent: 15 November 2006 18:59 To: support@freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 995 - auto update not working Update manually to 998. That should fix the problem. On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:32:58PM -, Mr. Flibble wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 996 is now available. Please upgrade. My node doesn't seem to want to update itself. For the last 2 days, I've had the following displayed on my fproxy homepage: ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem
So this is just an all peers are backed off frequently after the load limiting changes report? I have no idea :( Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or even being backed off? The usual nodes seem to be reconnecting. In the last couple of days, I'm up to 3-4 nodes connected (with 4-8 backed off) which seems better. I haven't changed anything here, so maybe someone else could have given their nodes more bandwidth? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1022
My node's been looking weird since this update: The menu on the main fproxy page just shows * Home * Queue And nothing else. Also, if I click on the Queue menu, I see that I have an outstanding alert: Minor: 1 | Total: 1 | See them on the Freenet FProxy Homepage., yet this isn't showing up, so I've no idea what it is! Any ideas? MrFlibble ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1022
Yes, I am accessing it remotely, and yes, it would have been helpful to have that listed in the build email! Thanks, MrFlibble This means that you access your node remotely, now you have to enable the total access if you want to be able to do everything remotely, otherwise you are protected from somebody messing up your node from the different ip. This change really should have been announced specifically. - Volodya - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum None of us are free until all of us are free.~ Mihail Bakunin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGDgQ6uWy2EFICg+0RAsBDAJ4rg1WqSBAtXTROawkBSbnRp+EyOgCeNl/8 30rCznEk3LvTESp9OtPNHeY= =wz6M -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1022
To make it clearer, a comment from jflesch: - Stop your node - Edit freenet.ini (in your node directory) - Set 'fproxy.allowedHostsFullAccess' to the same value as 'fproxy.allowedHosts' - Do the same for 'fcp.allowedHostsFullAccess' - Restart your node Thanks for the info. That new option will be quite handy actually. Shame it won't be back-ported to 0.5 :( ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Error after attempting auto update to build 1024
After attempting to do an update, which seemed to take a very long time (about an hour, which is a lot longer than It's taken before), I've tried to stop my node (as I couldn't get to the web interface). I tried stopping the windows service (which normally takes a while), but the java process is still running, pegging the cpu somewhat, and taskman refuses to kill the task... The last few lines of the log read as follows: Mar 31, 2007 21:44:45:850 (freenet.node.PeerManager, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Read 15 peers from .\peers- Mar 31, 2007 21:44:57:428 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datastore Mar 31, 2007 21:46:38:006 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache Mar 31, 2007 21:52:10:584 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing block numbers index... Before I reboot (which I'd prefer not to do as my freenet 0.5 node is also on this machine too and takes ages to start up), is this error serious, or should I leave it to do it's reconstruction ? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] FW: Error after attempting auto update to build 1024
Oops, just noticed it's running 1025: Initializing Node using freenet Build #1025 r12483M and freenet-ext Build #11 r12008 with Sun Microsystems Inc. JVM version 1.5.0_11-b03 running on x86 Windows 2000 5.0 After attempting to do an update, which seemed to take a very long time (about an hour, which is a lot longer than It's taken before), I've tried to stop my node (as I couldn't get to the web interface). I tried stopping the windows service (which normally takes a while), but the java process is still running, pegging the cpu somewhat, and taskman refuses to kill the task... The last few lines of the log read as follows: Mar 31, 2007 21:44:45:850 (freenet.node.PeerManager, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Read 15 peers from .\peers- Mar 31, 2007 21:44:57:428 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datastore Mar 31, 2007 21:46:38:006 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache Mar 31, 2007 21:52:10:584 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing block numbers index... Before I reboot (which I'd prefer not to do as my freenet 0.5 node is also on this machine too and takes ages to start up), is this error serious, or should I leave it to do it's reconstruction ? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] FW: Error after attempting auto update to build1024
After various restarts, upgrading to 1026 and another restart it seems to be ok now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mr. Flibble Sent: 31 March 2007 23:39 To: support@freenetproject.org Subject: [freenet-support] FW: Error after attempting auto update to build1024 Oops, just noticed it's running 1025: Initializing Node using freenet Build #1025 r12483M and freenet-ext Build #11 r12008 with Sun Microsystems Inc. JVM version 1.5.0_11-b03 running on x86 Windows 2000 5.0 After attempting to do an update, which seemed to take a very long time (about an hour, which is a lot longer than It's taken before), I've tried to stop my node (as I couldn't get to the web interface). I tried stopping the windows service (which normally takes a while), but the java process is still running, pegging the cpu somewhat, and taskman refuses to kill the task... The last few lines of the log read as follows: Mar 31, 2007 21:44:45:850 (freenet.node.PeerManager, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Read 15 peers from .\peers- Mar 31, 2007 21:44:57:428 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datastore Mar 31, 2007 21:46:38:006 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache Mar 31, 2007 21:52:10:584 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing block numbers index... Before I reboot (which I'd prefer not to do as my freenet 0.5 node is also on this machine too and takes ages to start up), is this error serious, or should I leave it to do it's reconstruction ? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Restricted Mode request
To who it may concern: The new restricted mode is a great idea, but I was wondering if the [Edit] link under the My Bookmarks section could be removed. Even though it doesn't do anything when you click it in this mode, it would be nice (from a piece-of-mind point if nothing else) if this wasn't visible. Thanks, MrFlibble ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Restricted Mode request
The new restricted mode is a great idea, but I was wondering if the [Edit] link under the My Bookmarks section could be removed. Even though it doesn't do anything when you click it in this mode, it would be nice (from a piece-of-mind point if nothing else) if this wasn't visible. Thanks, MrFlibble Such suggestions should be filed as bugs on the bug tracker: Sorry! Forgot about that! Done. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Temp files problem on #1026
What's the total size of the files being downloaded? No idea, fuqid only seems to report number of blocks, of which I have the following in the progress column: 7730/11627 8836/15643 10389/17127 15150/28798 And one that just says started ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Corrupt database after power cut
I've just restarted my machine after a user-involked power cut (I unplugged the wrong thing - doh!), and I've got the following error: Apr 16, 2007 21:40:59:328 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datastore Apr 16, 2007 21:40:59:437 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Recreating secondary databases Apr 16, 2007 21:40:59:437 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): This may take some time... Apr 16, 2007 21:41:12:906 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing access times index... Apr 16, 2007 21:44:48:843 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing block numbers index... Apr 16, 2007 21:45:04:906 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache Apr 16, 2007 21:46:25:375 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing pubKey Datastore Apr 16, 2007 21:46:32:750 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing pubKey Datacache Apr 16, 2007 21:47:02:546 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing SSK Datastore Apr 16, 2007 21:47:05:343 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing SSK Datacache Apr 16, 2007 21:47:31:890 (freenet.node.MemoryChecker, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Starting Memory Checker! Apr 16, 2007 21:47:31:890 (freenet.node.MemoryChecker, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Memory in use: 164 MiB Apr 16, 2007 21:47:32:546 (freenet.node.NodeClientCore, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing USK Manager Apr 16, 2007 21:48:34:234 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, RequestStarter$SenderThread for [EMAIL PROTECTED], ERROR): Trying to overwrite block 116071 but already used Apr 16, 2007 21:48:34:250 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, RequestStarter$SenderThread for [EMAIL PROTECTED], ERROR): Corrupt secondary database. Should be cleaned up on restart. However, I've tried restarting the node, which works for a minute or two, and then I get the same error again (on the same block) and the service stops. What can I do to stop this error? Hopefully I don't have to erase my database. Thanks. MrFlibble ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Corrupt database after power cut
Yup, that worked fine, thank you! I have these all the time, with and without power cuts. Delete database-X directory and start the node... it will take a long time, but it will rebuild it. - Volodya ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet-dev] Diffie-Hellman security fixforfreenet 0.5
--- Mr. Flibble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where can I get this patch (well, the new freenet.jar) for 0.5 then? http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/ doesn't seem to do a lot nowadays http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-stable-latest.tgz Thank you, And I've just found your posts on frost, now it's decided to update, thanks! ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Odd freenet.ini line
I have a freenet.ini file which has the following line in it: node.clientThrottleFile=.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\ .\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\client-throttle.dat Is there any reason for so many .\s as it looks weird? Thanks, MrFlibble ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] https and FProxy
If you mean v 0.7, there seems to be SSL Support built in. If you look at the web config screen, there are various SSL sections, but I get an error when I try and activate this. I'm guessing I have to generate the certs etc myself, but I haven't had time to look into it yet. If you mean 0.5, then you could set up an SSL version of apache on your server and use nph-proxy.cgi to get to it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Dixon Sent: 05 April 2008 22:02 To: support@freenetproject.org Subject: [freenet-support] https and FProxy Hello, I am running Freenet on a Dedicated Server down in London and accessing it remotely. This way it has a fast connection and at the moment 100gb for caches. Could anyone tell me how to se up freenet so it gets tunneled over https instead of http? Thanks Andy ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Please somebody help. Frost won't start
Sometimes Frost has taken a while to start up for me too, but I don't know why. This mainly happens if I haven't used it for a few months. One thing to check is if there is a dialog box warning you about old versions of keys (I wondered why Frost wasn't starting, and this was buried behind loads of other windows!), but if this is a new install, then this shouldn't be the problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of anonymouser anonymouser Sent: 17 June 2008 20:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; support@freenetproject.org Subject: [freenet-support] Please somebody help. Frost won't start Dear mailing list, I have sent an email to the frost and freenet mailing lists multiple times now. I don't know where else to ask. For weeks I have been having the problem now that Frost won't start. I am using linux and gnome. When I start Frost I am asked which version of of freenet I am using and I choose darknet 0.7. After clicking OK I only get as far as initializing mainframe. I waited for like 20 minutes. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Odd startup errors
I'm seeing the following (just by accident - I haven't really had time to use freenet since the last update): INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:34:33 | Key 4745216/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:34:59 | Key 4746240/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:35:19 | Key 4747264/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:35:38 | Key 4748288/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:36:02 | Key 4749312/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:36:29 | Key 4750336/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:37:05 | Key 4751360/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:37:32 | Key 4752384/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:38:00 | Key 4753408/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:38:27 | Key 4754432/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:39:02 | Key 4755456/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:39:29 | Key 4756480/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:39:55 | Key 4757504/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:40:17 | Key 4758528/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:40:40 | Key 4759552/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:41:11 | Key 4760576/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:41:35 | Key 4761600/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:41:59 | Key 4762624/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:42:24 | Key 4763648/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:42:57 | Key 4764672/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:43:20 | Key 4765696/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) INFO | jvm 5 | 2008/09/06 16:43:51 | Key 4766720/5346530 OK (308 dupes, 0 failures) Should I be concerned about this? What does it mean exactly? I haven't had chance to see how long this has been happening for yet. Thanks ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Odd startup errors
Hiya, Thanks for the reply. This means that the datastore was corrupted and is being reconstructed. This is normal, but if it happens very often there may be a problem. Ah, weird. Not sure what could have caused the corruption, my node's been up for a few days, without me restarting the service myself. Anyway, a couple of hours later and it seems to have fixed itself. Thanks! ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Changing ports etc.
If you're used to 0.5, then 0.7 should be easy. On the windows version the wizard will sort out things like that, and afterwards, it's all editable via the web interface. Just install it and try it! MrFlibble -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Level 13 Sent: 08 September 2008 22:12 To: support@freenetproject.org Subject: [freenet-support] Changing ports etc. Is there a short how-to for Freenet 0.7 installation for those who are switching from 0.5? Especially I'm looking for info about: -how to change the default ports (which are already taken by other services on my server, and are not to be used at all), for local access as well as the one visible on the outside, -where to put the hostname.dyndns.xyz info so that you can be reached if you have a dynamic IP? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Not connecting to any openet peers
Hi everyone. During the past few updates, I don't seen to be getting any opennet peers to attach to me. I have no firewall, not NATed, and it worked fine until the late 119x builds. Any ideas what I can do to get it to work? I don't have any darknet peers anymore (they disappeared before the trouble started). I am using the 1204 build from a few days ago: * Freenet 0.7 Build #1204 r25209 * Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771 On the Internet connection screen, I have quite a few ips listed as no reply or remote. Any suggestions? Thanks, MrFlibble ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
[freenet-support] Odd startup errors
Hiya, Thanks for the reply. > This means that the datastore was corrupted and is being > reconstructed. This > is normal, but if it happens very often there may be a problem. Ah, weird. Not sure what could have caused the corruption, my node's been up for a few days, without me restarting the service myself. Anyway, a couple of hours later and it seems to have fixed itself. Thanks!
[freenet-support] Changing ports etc.
If you're used to 0.5, then 0.7 should be easy. On the windows version the wizard will sort out things like that, and afterwards, it's all editable via the web interface. Just install it and try it! MrFlibble > -Original Message- > From: support-bounces at freenetproject.org > [mailto:support-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Level 13 > Sent: 08 September 2008 22:12 > To: support at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-support] Changing ports etc. > > Is there a short how-to for Freenet 0.7 installation for those who are > switching from 0.5? Especially I'm looking for info about: > -how to change the default ports (which are already taken by other > services on my server, and are not to be used at all), for local > access as well as the one visible on the outside, > -where to put the hostname.dyndns.xyz info so that you can be reached > if you have a dynamic IP?
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1163
Just had to update manually. This seems to happen now and again, where sometimes it will update automatically after I click on the "Update" request, other times it says it's downloaded it and will restart, and it just restarts with the same old version. Maybe this is due to it not downloading properly - originally I had to restart my node as it was displaying the "downloading new version" alert for more than a day, and seemed to be getting nowhere. Cheers, MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 995 - auto update not working
> Freenet 0.7 build 996 is now available. Please upgrade. My node doesn't seem to want to update itself. For the last 2 days, I've had the following displayed on my fproxy homepage: "It seems that your node isn't running the latest version of the software. Your node is currently fetching the update over Freenet. Once this is complete, you will be prompted to install the new version. Please be patient, this could take up to half an hour." At the moment, 6 of my connected peers are running 996, together with 2 backed off and 1 disconnetd node. Any idea why it's not downloaded it? It has updated itself from build 990 onwards within an hour or so without problems. MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 995 - auto update not working
Updating manually worked although had to try twice cos it hadn't shut the service down before it tried overwriting freenet.jar and truncated it to 0 bytes it the first time I ran it. Had to stop the service manually and then run update.cmd before it would work. Also, since 994 (I think), queing download via the web interface doesn't seem to keep the filenames associated with the CHK keys, where it worked perfectly before. Is this connected to the "the problems with chk/filename begin..." thread? Thanks, MrFlibble > -Original Message- > From: support-bounces at freenetproject.org > [mailto:support-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of toad > Sent: 15 November 2006 18:59 > To: support at freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 995 - auto > update not working > > Update manually to 998. That should fix the problem. > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:32:58PM -, Mr. Flibble wrote: > > > Freenet 0.7 build 996 is now available. Please upgrade. > > > > My node doesn't seem to want to update itself. > > For the last 2 days, I've had the following displayed on my fproxy > > homepage:
[freenet-support] Freenet (0.5, Build 5106) has trouble with time transitions
> It happened before, and it happened again tonight. I got woken up by > alarms indicating 100 % CPU usage, and found out it was being caused > by Freenet, so I restarted it. > Obviously it has problems when summer/winter time transitions occur. > It's only twice a year, but thought I should mention it. Ah! That would explain why mine crashed too last night!
[freenet-support] Temporary files error
Just got the following message when trying to load a freesite: Temporary files error Error: Internal temp files error, maybe disk full or permissions problem?: null My node has been running for several hours, and I have 515mb free on one drive, and 300gb free on another, so this shouldn't be the issue. None of the permissions will have changed as I have been browsing other freesites this morning without any problem and without changing anything on my freenet machine. Any ideas? Thanks,
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1022
My node's been looking weird since this update: The menu on the main fproxy page just shows * Home * Queue And nothing else. Also, if I click on the Queue menu, I see that I have an outstanding alert: "Minor: 1 | Total: 1 | See them on the Freenet FProxy Homepage.", yet this isn't showing up, so I've no idea what it is! Any ideas? MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1022
Yes, I am accessing it remotely, and yes, it would have been helpful to have that listed in the build email! Thanks, MrFlibble > This means that you access your node remotely, now you have > to enable the total access if > you want to be able to do everything remotely, otherwise you > are protected from somebody > messing up your node from the different ip. > > This change really should have been announced specifically. > > - Volodya > > - -- > http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast > http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki > http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum > > "None of us are free until all of us are free."~ Mihail Bakunin > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFGDgQ6uWy2EFICg+0RAsBDAJ4rg1WqSBAtXTROawkBSbnRp+EyOgCeNl/8 > 30rCznEk3LvTESp9OtPNHeY= > =wz6M > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe >
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1022
> To make it clearer, a comment from jflesch: > > - Stop your node > - Edit freenet.ini (in your node directory) > - Set 'fproxy.allowedHostsFullAccess' to the same value as > 'fproxy.allowedHosts' > - Do the same for 'fcp.allowedHostsFullAccess' > - Restart your node Thanks for the info. That new option will be quite handy actually. Shame it won't be back-ported to 0.5 :(
[freenet-support] Error after attempting auto update to build 1024
After attempting to do an update, which seemed to take a very long time (about an hour, which is a lot longer than It's taken before), I've tried to stop my node (as I couldn't get to the web interface). I tried stopping the windows service (which normally takes a while), but the java process is still running, pegging the cpu somewhat, and taskman refuses to kill the task... The last few lines of the log read as follows: Mar 31, 2007 21:44:45:850 (freenet.node.PeerManager, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Read 15 peers from .\peers- Mar 31, 2007 21:44:57:428 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datastore Mar 31, 2007 21:46:38:006 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache Mar 31, 2007 21:52:10:584 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing block numbers index... Before I reboot (which I'd prefer not to do as my freenet 0.5 node is also on this machine too and takes ages to start up), is this error serious, or should I leave it to do it's "reconstruction" ?
[freenet-support] FW: Error after attempting auto update to build 1024
Oops, just noticed it's running 1025: Initializing Node using freenet Build #1025 r12483M and freenet-ext Build #11 r12008 with Sun Microsystems Inc. JVM version 1.5.0_11-b03 running on x86 Windows 2000 5.0 > After attempting to do an update, which seemed to take a very long time (about an hour, which is a lot longer than It's taken before), I've tried to stop my node (as I couldn't get to the web interface). > I tried stopping the windows service (which normally takes a while), but the java process is still running, pegging the cpu somewhat, and taskman refuses to kill the task... > The last few lines of the log read as follows: > Mar 31, 2007 21:44:45:850 (freenet.node.PeerManager, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): > Read 15 peers from .\peers- > Mar 31, 2007 21:44:57:428 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datastore > Mar 31, 2007 21:46:38:006 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache > Mar 31, 2007 21:52:10:584 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing block numbers index... > Before I reboot (which I'd prefer not to do as my freenet 0.5 node is also on this machine too and takes ages to start up), is this error serious, or should I leave it to do it's "reconstruction" ?
[freenet-support] Windows Installation problem
Hi everyone, Just tried to install v0.7 on windows 2000, and am having problems. I already have freenet 0.5 installed, which I want to keep running, but while I was installing 0.7 (to a different directory), it was stopped. Anyway, I left the installer to install everything listed, and it got to the part where it has to download bits, and it complained with something like "plugin already installed" or something similar, with only a quit button active. (I'm afraid I didn't write it down at the time as I thought it was just a warning). Why would this happen on a vanilla install? Also, how do I uninstall it properly and start again? >From the parent directory, "java -jar Freenet7\Uninstaller\uninstaller.jar" brought up an uninstall dialog, but pressing the uninstall button didn't seem to do anything, yet, rerunning the installer warns me about installing another instance of freenet. Any ideas? Thanks, MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Restricted Mode request
To who it may concern: The new restricted mode is a great idea, but I was wondering if the "[Edit]" link under the "My Bookmarks" section could be removed. Even though it doesn't do anything when you click it in this mode, it would be nice (from a piece-of-mind point if nothing else) if this wasn't visible. Thanks, MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Restricted Mode request
> > The new restricted mode is a great idea, but I was > wondering if the "[Edit]" > > link under the "My Bookmarks" section could be removed. > > Even though it doesn't do anything when you click it in > this mode, it would > > be nice (from a piece-of-mind point if nothing else) if > this wasn't visible. > > Thanks, > > > > MrFlibble > > Such suggestions should be filed as bugs on the bug tracker: Sorry! Forgot about that! Done.
[freenet-support] Temp files problem on #1026
For the last few weeks, I seem to be having a lot of temp files created, even though freenet seems to be running fine. At the moment I've got 31,935 files in my freenet temp directory, all of which have been created in the last two days and my node has been up for 1 day and 4 hours. Sizes range from 1k to 4mb, and they are taking up 1,375mb! I'm running Fuqid, but only 5 files are being downloaded at the moment, and there's not much other activity going on as far as I know. Any ideas on why I'm getting so many? Thanks, MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Temp files problem on #1026
> What's the total size of the files being downloaded? No idea, fuqid only seems to report number of blocks, of which I have the following in the progress column: 7730/11627 8836/15643 10389/17127 15150/28798 And one that just says "started"
[freenet-support] Corrupt database after power cut
I've just restarted my machine after a user-involked power cut (I unplugged the wrong thing - doh!), and I've got the following error: Apr 16, 2007 21:40:59:328 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datastore Apr 16, 2007 21:40:59:437 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Recreating secondary databases Apr 16, 2007 21:40:59:437 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): This may take some time... Apr 16, 2007 21:41:12:906 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing access times index... Apr 16, 2007 21:44:48:843 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing block numbers index... Apr 16, 2007 21:45:04:906 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache Apr 16, 2007 21:46:25:375 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing pubKey Datastore Apr 16, 2007 21:46:32:750 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing pubKey Datacache Apr 16, 2007 21:47:02:546 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing SSK Datastore Apr 16, 2007 21:47:05:343 (freenet.node.Node, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing SSK Datacache Apr 16, 2007 21:47:31:890 (freenet.node.MemoryChecker, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Starting Memory Checker! Apr 16, 2007 21:47:31:890 (freenet.node.MemoryChecker, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Memory in use: 164 MiB Apr 16, 2007 21:47:32:546 (freenet.node.NodeClientCore, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing USK Manager Apr 16, 2007 21:48:34:234 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, RequestStarter$SenderThread for freenet.client.async.SingleBlockInserter at ee2bec, ERROR): Trying to overwrite block 116071 but already used Apr 16, 2007 21:48:34:250 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, RequestStarter$SenderThread for freenet.client.async.SingleBlockInserter at ee2bec, ERROR): Corrupt secondary database. Should be cleaned up on restart. However, I've tried restarting the node, which works for a minute or two, and then I get the same error again (on the same block) and the service stops. What can I do to stop this error? Hopefully I don't have to erase my database. Thanks. MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Corrupt database after power cut
Yup, that worked fine, thank you! > I have these all the time, with and without power cuts. > Delete database-X directory > and start the node... it will take a long time, but it will > rebuild it. > > - Volodya
[freenet-support] FW: Error after attempting auto update to build1024
After various restarts, upgrading to 1026 and another restart it seems to be ok now. > -Original Message- > From: support-bounces at freenetproject.org > [mailto:support-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Mr. Flibble > Sent: 31 March 2007 23:39 > To: support at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-support] FW: Error after attempting auto > update to build1024 > > Oops, just noticed it's running 1025: > > Initializing Node using freenet Build #1025 r12483M and > freenet-ext Build > #11 r12008 with Sun Microsystems Inc. JVM version > 1.5.0_11-b03 running on > x86 Windows 2000 5.0 > > > After attempting to do an update, which seemed to take a > very long time > (about an hour, which is a lot longer than It's taken > before), I've tried to > stop my node (as I couldn't get to the web interface). > > > I tried stopping the windows service (which normally > takes a while), > but the java process is still running, pegging the cpu > somewhat, and taskman > refuses to kill the task... > > > The last few lines of the log read as follows: > > > Mar 31, 2007 21:44:45:850 (freenet.node.PeerManager, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): > Read 15 peers from > .\peers- > > Mar 31, 2007 21:44:57:428 (freenet.node.Node, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datastore > > Mar 31, 2007 21:46:38:006 (freenet.node.Node, > WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache > > Mar 31, 2007 21:52:10:584 (freenet.store.BerkeleyDBFreenetStore, > WrapperListener_start_runner, ERROR): Reconstructing block > numbers index... > > > Before I reboot (which I'd prefer not to do as my freenet > 0.5 node is > also on this machine too and takes ages to start up), is this > error serious, > or should I leave it to do it's "reconstruction" ?
[freenet-support] [freenet-dev] Diffie-Hellman security fixforfreenet 0.5
> --- "Mr. Flibble" wrote: > > Where can I get this patch (well, the new freenet.jar) for 0.5 then? > > http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/ doesn't seem to do a lot > > nowadays > > http://downloads.freenetproject.org/freenet-stable-latest.tgz Thank you, And I've just found your posts on frost, now it's decided to update, thanks!
[freenet-support] [freenet-dev] Diffie-Hellman security fix forfreenet 0.5
Hi everyone! Where can I get this patch (well, the new freenet.jar) for 0.5 then? http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/ doesn't seem to do a lot nowadays Thanks, MrFlibble > -Original Message- > From: support-bounces at freenetproject.org > [mailto:support-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of > Matthew Toseland > Sent: 13 November 2007 22:19 > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Cc: Jack O'Lantern; support at freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] [freenet-dev] Diffie-Hellman > security fix forfreenet 0.5 > > On Friday 02 November 2007 23:25, Jack O'Lantern wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it took me some time but I managed to subscribe to > > this list through TOR. I've sent and canceled a > > previous message, sorry for the confusion. > > > > I've attached a patch for freenet 0.5. It fixes the > > Diffie-Hellman exponential weakness. I hope I caught > > every instance of this weakness in the code. Please > > apply this patch and build freenet 0.5-5108. > > > > "Nomen Nescio" kindly posted the patch to the support > > list in the form in which I posted it on Frost at Freenet > > 0.5. The only difference in the attached patch is that > > the build.xml file remains unchanged, so you can use > > your own build process. > > The patch posted to support has been applied (without the > build.xml change). > It was rather troublesome to apply probably because of its > going via Frost > (tab to space translations?). The weak DH keys issue is not > the only security > problem with Freenet 0.5, and as it is unmaintained by the > core team, we > would be happy for you to have an SVN account and maintain > Freenet 0.5.
[freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem
> So this is just an "all peers are backed off frequently after > the load > limiting changes" report? I have no idea :( > Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or > even being > backed off? The usual nodes seem to be reconnecting. In the last couple of days, I'm up to 3-4 nodes connected (with 4-8 backed off) which seems better. I haven't changed anything here, so maybe someone else could have given their nodes more bandwidth?
[freenet-support] Please somebody help. Frost won't start
Sometimes Frost has taken a while to start up for me too, but I don't know why. This mainly happens if I haven't used it for a few months. One thing to check is if there is a dialog box warning you about old versions of keys (I wondered why Frost wasn't starting, and this was buried behind loads of other windows!), but if this is a new install, then this shouldn't be the problem. > -Original Message- > From: support-bounces at freenetproject.org > [mailto:support-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of > anonymouser anonymouser > Sent: 17 June 2008 20:59 > To: jtcfrost-support at lists.sourceforge.net; support at freenetproject.org > Subject: [freenet-support] Please somebody help. Frost won't start > > Dear mailing list, > > I have sent an email to the frost and freenet mailing lists > multiple times now. > I don't know where else to ask. For weeks I have been having the > problem now that Frost won't start. > > I am using linux and gnome. When I start Frost I am asked which > version of of freenet I am using and I choose darknet 0.7. After > clicking OK I only get as far as "initializing mainframe". I waited > for like 20 minutes.
[freenet-support] Not connecting to any openet peers
Hi everyone. During the past few updates, I don't seen to be getting any opennet peers to attach to me. I have no firewall, not NATed, and it worked fine until the late 119x builds. Any ideas what I can do to get it to work? I don't have any darknet peers anymore (they disappeared before the trouble started). I am using the 1204 build from a few days ago: * Freenet 0.7 Build #1204 r25209 * Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771 On the Internet connection screen, I have quite a few ips listed as "no reply" or "remote". Any suggestions? Thanks, MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Odd freenet.ini line
I have a freenet.ini file which has the following line in it: node.clientThrottleFile=.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\ .\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\client-throttle.dat Is there any reason for so many ".\"s as it looks weird? Thanks, MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1073
Hi everyone, Have I missed an announcement of 1073? I haven't seen one since 1070, and I've checked my spam filters (which mailing list messages sometimes get stuck in). Thanks, MrFlibble
[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1073
> 1073: bugfix release Thanks juiceman!
