The following reply was made to PR general/2202; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Subject: Re: general/2202: .cgi programs in user directories run without
suexec (fwd)
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 16:14:48 -0600 (MDT)
The following reply was made to PR mod_proxy/2186; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Albaney Baylao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_proxy/2186: Garbage Colection Faults
Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 18:09:05 EST
>Show me the directives in your config f
The following reply was made to PR general/2202; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "J. M. Hinkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: general/2202: .cgi programs in user directories run without suexec
Date: Thu, 7 May 1
The following reply was made to PR general/2193; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Subject: Re: general/2193: Images being served in an inconsistant manor
(fwd)
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 13:43:26 -0600 (MDT)
-
The following reply was made to PR mod_proxy/2186; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Albaney Baylao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mod_proxy/2186: Garbage Colection Faults
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 13:44:49 -0600 (MDT)
The following reply was made to PR mod_proxy/2186; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Albaney Baylao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_proxy/2186: Garbage Colection Faults
Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 16:10:27 EST
No, the problem continues. I changed
The following reply was made to PR general/2193; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Subject: Re: general/2193: Images being served in an inconsistant manor
(fwd)
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 11:42:47 -0600 (MDT)
-
The following reply was made to PR os-bsdi/2196; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Subject: Re: os-bsdi/2196: do not #include (fwd)
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 11:14:33 -0600 (MDT)
-- Forwarded message -
Synopsis: do not #include
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: marc
State-Changed-When: Thu May 7 10:16:28 PDT 1998
State-Changed-Why:
Broken compiler.
Synopsis: .cgi programs in user directories run without suexec
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: marc
State-Changed-When: Thu May 7 09:52:34 PDT 1998
State-Changed-Why:
If suexec isn't enabled, then of course CGIs in
user directories don't run as the user.
If it is enabled, th
Synopsis: searching bugdb by platform
Synopsis-Changed-From: searching bugdb by platform
Synopsis-Changed-To: searching bugdb by version
Synopsis-Changed-By: marc
Synopsis-Changed-When: Thu May 7 09:49:52 PDT 1998
Synopsis: N/a
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: marc
State-Changed-When: Thu May 7 09:49:02 PDT 1998
State-Changed-Why:
As Dean said, this really isn't practical with the whole
structure of the current database. Even if it was, we
really don't have the manpower to indicate in
Synopsis: source html code is shown but not the page
State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed
State-Changed-By: marc
State-Changed-When: Thu May 7 09:46:17 PDT 1998
State-Changed-Why:
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say.
You say you are running Apache 1.2 on NT, but 1.2 doesn't
The following reply was made to PR general/2187; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jonathan Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: general/2187: web server running 1 hour ahead of the
server itself
Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 10:05:36 -0400
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: No OS name in SERVER_VERSION - 1.3 must have, because n
>Number: 2203
>Category: general
>Synopsis: logresolve doesn't find all domains
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:apache
>State: open
>Class: support
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Thu May 7 04:10
The following reply was made to PR general/2201; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: general/2201: N/a
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 02:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Unfortunately, the release is a freeform tex
>Number: 2202
>Category: general
>Synopsis: .cgi programs in user directories run without suexec
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:apache
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date
>Number: 2201
>Category: general
>Synopsis: N/a
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:apache
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Thu May 7 01:40:00 PDT 1998
>Last-Modified:
On Wed, May 06, 1998 at 04:23:50PM -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> At 03:28 PM 5/6/98 -0700, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> >First I wanted to say, you're right, a request with a "Range: bytes=0-" in
> >the header will not have a "Accept-Range: bytes" in the response, in the
> >current CVS code. That
>Number: 2200
>Category: general
>Synopsis: source html code is shown but not the page
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:apache
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Thu Ma
>Number: 2199
>Category: general
>Synopsis: couldn't start apache webserver using apachectl
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:apache
>State: open
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date:
The following reply was made to PR general/2187; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jonathan Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: general/2187: web server running 1 hour ahead of the server itself
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 23:54:02 -0600 (MDT)
The following reply was made to PR os-bsdi/2196; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jon Drukman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: os-bsdi/2196: do not #include
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 23:51:29 -0600 (MDT)
On 6 May 1998, Jon Drukman wrote:
The following reply was made to PR mod_log-any/2190; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Subject: Re: mod_log-any/2190: Incomplete reansfer log (fwd)
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 23:40:04 -0600 (MDT)
-- Forwarded me
The following reply was made to PR mod_proxy/1472; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dan Stephans II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>(by way of Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Subject: Re: mod_proxy/1472: extra headers on POST method CGI returns
Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 18:12:46
The following reply was made to PR os-solaris/2185; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "C. R. Oldham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: os-solaris/2185: 'apachectl restart' or 'apachectl
graceful' causes httpd to die
>Further investigation revealed that it belongs to 'rotatelogs', which I use
>for all my logging. Rotatelogs does not install a signal handler for
>SIGTERM--is this the problem?
Sounds like an obvious question, but if you don't use rotatelogs, does your
system still hang/die?
Brian
--
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: extra headers on POST method CGI returns
State-Changed
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
Synopsis: Need a way to do radius based authentication
State-Cha
30 matches
Mail list logo
