On Thursday 03 January 2019 15:39:51 Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 03:31 PM, deloptes wrote:
> > cat /etc/debian_version
>
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# cat /etc/debian_version
> 9.6
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# df -hl
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> udev
On Thursday 03 January 2019 15:36:33 Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 03:31 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Stephen P. Molnar (2019-01-03):
> >> Thank you for your helpful comment. Unfortunately. I am an
> >> Organioc Chemist, not an IT person. Therefore, I am only a user.
> >
> > Then ask
deloptes wrote:
> Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
>> /dev/sda1 23G 23G 0 100% /
>
> bingo - the root of all evil
yep.
> you need to free up some space somewhere in /
>
> Perhaps you have some stuff in root home
>
> $ sudo du -hs /root
>
> If not - look where the place is gone?
>
>
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:37:36 -0500
"Stephen P. Molnar" wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 12:19 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:54:44 -0500
> > "Stephen P. Molnar" wrote:
> >
> >> I am running Debian Stretch and have just encountered a problem during
> >> a routine apt-get
Nicolas George wrote:
> You do realize that in most countries, a license is required to operate
> motor vehicles and obtaining it requires acquiring a certain amount of
> knowledge, right?
Come on, the argument of Roberto C. Sánchez holds. Operator != Mechanic. To
operate a PC means you know how
Roberto C. Sánchez (2019-01-03):
> That would be like saying that someone who operates a motor vehicle
> without also being a mechanic is doing so without acquiring the required
> knowlege.
You do realize that in most countries, a license is required to operate
motor vehicles and obtaining it
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 10:27:30PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> > > Then ask your sysadmin.
>
> > I have no sysadmin.
>
> Then you are not "only a user", you are a sysadmin, and you are trying
> to be one without acquiring the required knowledge.
I Have No Sysadmin And I Must Sudo
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 10:27:30PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Stephen P. Molnar (2019-01-03):
> > > > Thank you for your helpful comment. Unfortunately. I am an Organioc
> > > > Chemist, not an IT person. Therefore, I am only a user.
>
> > > Then ask your sysadmin.
>
> > I have no sysadmin.
Stephen P. Molnar (2019-01-03):
> > > Thank you for your helpful comment. Unfortunately. I am an Organioc
> > > Chemist, not an IT person. Therefore, I am only a user.
> > Then ask your sysadmin.
> I have no sysadmin.
Then you are not "only a user", you are a sysadmin, and you are trying
to be
Nicolas George wrote:
> Could you please read the mails you are answering to before spewing
> unhelpful comments?
Next time please explain ... not that I did not understand what you mean,
but it sounds very personal.
You could just point out, that it is not possible to install package when
the
Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> /dev/sda1 23G 23G 0 100% /
bingo - the root of all evil
you need to free up some space somewhere in /
Perhaps you have some stuff in root home
$ sudo du -hs /root
If not - look where the place is gone?
regards
On 01/03/2019 03:31 PM, deloptes wrote:
cat /etc/debian_version
root@AbNormal:/home/comp# cat /etc/debian_version
9.6
root@AbNormal:/home/comp# df -hl
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev
tmpfs 789M 18M 772M 3% /run
On 01/03/2019 03:31 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Stephen P. Molnar (2019-01-03):
Thank you for your helpful comment. Unfortunately. I am an Organioc
Chemist, not an IT person. Therefore, I am only a user.
Then ask your sysadmin.
Regards,
I have no sysadmin.
--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# touch /etc/ld.so.cache
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# /sbin/ldconfig
> /sbin/ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed: No such file or directory
Tell us which version you have
$ cat /etc/debian_version
9.6
check and post here if
deloptes (2019-01-03):
> You don't just copy executables here and there (unless instructed to do so)
> You install via package manager
Could you please read the mails you are answering to before spewing
unhelpful comments?
Thanks in advance.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Stephen P. Molnar (2019-01-03):
> Thank you for your helpful comment. Unfortunately. I am an Organioc
> Chemist, not an IT person. Therefore, I am only a user.
Then ask your sysadmin.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> strace is in /usr/bin on there. I copied it to the host and ran it.
>
> comp@AbNormal:~$ sudo ./strace
> [sudo] password for comp:
> ./strace: must have PROG [ARGS] or -p PID
> Try './strace -h' for more information.
>
> I'm totally at sea here, which switch should
On 01/03/2019 02:42 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 02:30:49PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ls -ld / /etc /etc/ld.*
drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 4096 Dec 19 13:17 /
drwxr-xr-x 134 root root 12288 Jan 3 09:43 /etc
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 237114
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 01:58:10PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> Yes, but we don't. Type "df" without the quotes.
Hell, even WITH the quotes it'll still work!
On Thu 03 Jan 2019 at 14:38:09 (-0500), Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 01:27 PM, songbird wrote:
> > apt-get install libc --reinstall
>
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt-get install libc --reinstall
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information...
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 02:42:50PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> When I run "strace /sbin/ldconfig" on my system, I see this line:
>
> rename("/etc/ld.so.cache~", "/etc/ld.so.cache") = 0
Oh, and there was also this stuff:
stat("/var/cache/ldconfig", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0700, st_size=4096, ...}) =
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 02:30:49PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ls -ld / /etc /etc/ld.*
> drwxr-xr-x 26 root root 4096 Dec 19 13:17 /
> drwxr-xr-x 134 root root 12288 Jan 3 09:43 /etc
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 237114 Dec 26 14:47 /etc/ld.so.cache
> -rw---
On 01/03/2019 02:10 PM, deloptes wrote:
Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ldconfig
ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed: No such file or directory
Try
touch /etc/ld.so.cache
and repeat
root@AbNormal:/home/comp# sbin/ldconfig
-bash: sbin/ldconfig: No such file or
On 01/03/2019 01:27 PM, songbird wrote:
apt-get install libc --reinstall
root@AbNormal:/home/comp# apt-get install libc --reinstall
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package libc
so far as I know, I am not out of
On 01/03/2019 12:53 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:49:48PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ldconfig
ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed: No such file or directory
You NEED to figure out why this is happening. Is the entire /etc
directory
Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ldconfig
> ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed: No such file or directory
Try
touch /etc/ld.so.cache
and repeat
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# sbin/ldconfig
> -bash: sbin/ldconfig: No such file or directory
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp#
It
Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I am running Debian Stretch and have just encountered a problem during
> a routine apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
> Specifically, it failed with the following error messages.
>
> E: libc-bin: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
> error exit status 1
>
>
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:49:48PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ldconfig
> ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed: No such file or directory
You NEED to figure out why this is happening. Is the entire /etc
directory gone, or something?
Show some basic initiative.
Stephen P. Molnar (2019-01-03):
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# ldconfig
> ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed: No such file or directory
At this point, I would suggest:
strace ldconfig
> root@AbNormal:/home/comp# sbin/ldconfig
> -bash: sbin/ldconfig: No such file or directory
You should
On 01/03/2019 12:35 PM, deloptes wrote:
deloptes wrote:
man ldconfig -> cache default is /etc/ld.so.cache
Was it altered and you forgot? Or is it someting wrong with the default
cache file
$ ls -al /etc/ld.so.cache
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 176004 Jan 1 21:56 /etc/ld.so.cache
as root try
On 01/03/2019 12:19 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:54:44 -0500
"Stephen P. Molnar" wrote:
I am running Debian Stretch and have just encountered a problem during
a routine apt-get dist-upgrade.
Specifically, it failed with the following error messages.
E: libc-bin:
deloptes wrote:
> man ldconfig -> cache default is /etc/ld.so.cache
>
> Was it altered and you forgot? Or is it someting wrong with the default
> cache file
>
> $ ls -al /etc/ld.so.cache
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 176004 Jan 1 21:56 /etc/ld.so.cache
as root try
touch /etc/ld.so.cache
run
On 01/03/2019 11:43 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 17:33:20 +0100
steve wrote:
Hello steve,
had the same problem. It seems su behaviour has changed recently. I
It changed several months ago. I got notification 8 Aug 2018.
As you go on to point out, 'su -' should permit OP to
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 17:33:20 +0100
steve wrote:
Hello steve,
>had the same problem. It seems su behaviour has changed recently. I
It changed several months ago. I got notification 8 Aug 2018.
As you go on to point out, 'su -' should permit OP to update without
problem.
--
Regards _
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:54:44 -0500
"Stephen P. Molnar" wrote:
> I am running Debian Stretch and have just encountered a problem during
> a routine apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
> Specifically, it failed with the following error messages.
>
> E: libc-bin: subprocess installed post-installation
On 01/03/2019 11:29 AM, deloptes wrote:
Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing package libc-bin (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
man ldconfig -> cache default
Hi Stephan,
Perhaps have you become root with 'su' only. A couple of weeks ago, I
had the same problem. It seems su behaviour has changed recently. I
tried 'su -' to become root, and the error disappeared.
I guess some reading of su changelog file might explain this. But too lazy
for that.
Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> ldconfig: Writing of cache data failed: No such file or directory
> dpkg: error processing package libc-bin (--configure):
> subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
man ldconfig -> cache default is /etc/ld.so.cache
Was it altered and
rrors were encountered while processing:
libc-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
root@AbNormal:/home/comp#
slightly different from my first message.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Upgrade Problem
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:54:44 -0500
From: Stephen
I am running Debian Stretch and have just encountered a problem during
a routine apt-get dist-upgrade.
Specifically, it failed with the following error messages.
E: libc-bin: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
error exit status 1
Please advise.
Thanks in advance.
--
* rhkra...@gmail.com [2018-12-25 09:21 -0500]:
[...]
> But now I'm at this point:
>
> root@s31:~# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
>
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:21:39 -0500
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> [snip]
>
> But now I'm at this point:
>
> root@s31:~# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages have been
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 09:21:39AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, it helped a lot -- I seem to have one problem remaining
> (below).
[...]
> df told me that /var was at 100%, and /boot was at 98%.
"apt-get autoclean" or its more drastic sibling "apt-get clean" might
Thanks for the reply, it helped a lot -- I seem to have one problem remaining
(below).
On Monday, December 24, 2018 06:22:58 PM Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> You need to
> # apt install firmware-realtek
Ok, I did the apt-get install firmware-realtek and that got rid of the
complaints about the
Thanks very much -- that helped a lot -- there is one outstanding problem,
but, for various reasons, I don't have time for a full reply atm -- I'll try
to reply more fully tomorrow or the day after.
On Monday, December 24, 2018 06:22:58 PM Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * rh kramer [2018-12-24
* rh kramer [2018-12-24 18:10 -0500]:
> On my Jessie system, for something like the last 2 to 3 months, I've been
> getting an error like the following whenever I do an apt-get update /
> apt-get upgrade cycle.
[...]
> Ok, it looks like I have the r8169 as I see this:
>
> r8169
On my Jessie system, for something like the last 2 to 3 months, I've been
getting an error like the following whenever I do an apt-get update /
apt-get upgrade cycle.
I've been ignoring it, hoping it would go away with some future update, but
so far it hasn't.
The (edited) error message is shown
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 6:13 PM Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 08:33, Default User wrote:
> > Setting up libsane1:amd64 (1.0.27-1) ...
> > Setting up sane-utils (1.0.27-1) ...
> > Installing new version of config file /etc/user/saned ...
> > Installing new version of config file
On 02/09/2018 08:33, Default User wrote:
Setting up libsane1:amd64 (1.0.27-1) ...
Setting up sane-utils (1.0.27-1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/user/saned ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/saned ...
update-inetd: warning: cannot add service, /etc/inetd.conf
gt;> sane-backends 1.0.27-1 (the source package) was just uploaded and should
> >> soon be available on sid:
> >>
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/984005/accepted-sane-backends-1027-1-source-into-unstable/
> >> This upload (supposedly) fixes #905913 and so should res
ckends 1.0.27-1 (the source package) was just uploaded and should
soon be available on sid:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/984005/accepted-sane-backends-1027-1-source-into-unstable/
This upload (supposedly) fixes #905913 and so should resolve the upgrade
problem.
Hi, Ben.
Thanks for the h
ight?
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905913
>
> sane-backends 1.0.27-1 (the source package) was just uploaded and should
> soon be available on sid:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/984005/accepted-sane-backends-1027-1-source-into-unstable/
>
&
n sid:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/984005/accepted-sane-backends-1027-1-source-into-unstable/
This upload (supposedly) fixes #905913 and so should resolve the upgrade
problem.
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Director
Transient Software Limited <https://transient.nz/>
New Zealand
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 15:19 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> > Running sid (Debian Unstable).
> > For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
> > updates work as normal:
> > user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
> >
On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
Running sid (Debian Unstable).
For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
updates work as normal:
user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
[sudo] password for default:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
Running sid (Debian Unstable).
For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
updates work as normal:
user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
[sudo] password for default:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libsane1{ab}
The following packages will be
> From: a...@cityscape.co.uk
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 18:21:15 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 17:39 (UTC-0400):
>> > > 27 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
>> > Need to get 68.5 MB of archives.> After this
On Fri 21 Jul 2017 at 00:43:08 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> Joe Pfeiffer composed on 2017-07-20 15:38 (UTC-0600):
>
> > David Wright wrote:
>
> >> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>
> >> I did. Where
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:48:17 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
> On 20-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:48:17 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > If you have minimal install, why do you suspect that something is
> > > wrong, rather
On 20-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:48:17 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> wrote:
>
> >
> > If you have minimal install, why do you suspect that something is
> > wrong, rather to suppose that all is fine and that simply there was
> > no security updates for your
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:55:15 + (UTC) david...@freevolt.org wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
> > find this unusual.
>
> And so,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:48:17 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
> On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28
Joe Pfeiffer composed on 2017-07-20 15:38 (UTC-0600):
> David Wright wrote:
>> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>> I did. Where does it say that?
> The closest thing to that statement I've encountered is
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:41:33 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 07:05 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 19
David Wright writes:
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>>
>> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
>> > etc., but get no security or
> Op 20-07-17 om 18:58 schreef Fungi4All:
>> Does it matter what we all think, even if agree or it matters what
>> the manual of the package says. In my installation this is manual
>> I found, it says apt all over the place, meanwhile there is apt-get
>> package to install.
Op 20-07-17 om 18:58 schreef Fungi4All:
Does it matter what we all think, even if agree or it matters what
the manual of the package says. In my installation this is manual
I found, it says apt all over the place, meanwhile there is apt-get
package to install. /usr/share/man/man8/apt-get.8.gz
> From: deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Agreed. I was beginning to despair of this list while reading through
> this thread. But we seem to live in times when evidence matters less
> and less, and assertion more and more.
> Sorry about the politics. Anyway, AFAICT
On Thu 20 Jul 2017 at 21:21:08 (+1000), Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 20.07.17 03:27, Felix Miata wrote:
> > David Wright composed on 2017-07-19 23:33 (UTC-0500):
> >
> > > On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> >
> > >> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to
On 20.07.17 03:27, Felix Miata wrote:
> David Wright composed on 2017-07-19 23:33 (UTC-0500):
>
> > On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>
> > I did. Where does it say that?
>
> It was a long time ago that I
David Wright composed on 2017-07-19 23:33 (UTC-0500):
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
> I did. Where does it say that?
It was a long time ago that I first encountered it, and don't remember where it
was.
On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
> wrote:
>
> > On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 19-07-17, Patrick
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
this unusual.
And so, understandably, you feel prompted to seek confirmation that
there have, in fact, been no
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 14:57:50 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote:
> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> > etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> > this unusual. Did a mail
On 07/19/2017 07:05 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
wrote:
On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:13:06 -0400 Fungi4All
wrote:
> From: nemomm...@gmail.com
>
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:32:04 -0400 Dan Ritter
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >> > Getting no results from
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:47:27 -0700 Jimmy Johnson
wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>> Getting no results from apt-get
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 18:21:15 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 17:39 (UTC-0400):
>
> >> Brian composed:
> >> One picture is worth a thousand words:
> ...
> > Here is a picture from my backup machine
> > $ sudo apt upgrade
> ...
> > 27 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0
Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 17:39 (UTC-0400):
>> Brian composed:
>> One picture is worth a thousand words:
...
> Here is a picture from my backup machine
> $ sudo apt upgrade
...
> 27 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
> Need to get 68.5 MB of archives.> After this
> From: a...@cityscape.co.uk
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> One picture is worth a thousand words:
Here is a picture from my backup machine
$ sudo apt upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following
> From: a...@cityscape.co.uk
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 16:20:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> One picture is worth a thousand words:
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
n
> Which should be trusted more. apt-get or apt?
I've always liked apt. It is four keystrokes shorter
From: nemomm...@gmail.com
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:32:04 -0400 Dan Ritter
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
>> > apps, etc., but get no security or
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 16:20:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Brian composed on 2017-07-19 20:54 (UTC+0100):
>
> > On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 15:49:47 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>
> >> > But will there be different results with apt upgrade than
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:57:50 -0400 Felix Miata
wrote:
> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
> > find this
On 07/19/2017 01:35 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
find
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:32:04 -0400 Dan Ritter
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
> > find
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:14:28 +0200 Dejan Jocic
wrote:
> On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install
> > apps, etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I
> > find this unusual. Did a mail list
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:54:28 +0100
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>Those sort of statements are begging for an example of the diferences
>with an upgrade or package installation. Will we see it?
I seem to recall there have been several examples over the past year or
so on
Brian composed on 2017-07-19 20:54 (UTC+0100):
> On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 15:49:47 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>> > But will there be different results with apt upgrade than with apt-get?
>> Will:I have no idea.
>> Can: Yes.
>> Apt and
> From: mrma...@earthlink.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>>> mrma...@earthlink.net composed:
> ...
>>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>> But will there be different results with apt upgrade than with apt-get?
>
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 15:49:47 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>
> >> mrma...@earthlink.net composed:
> ...
> >> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
>
> > But will there be different results with apt upgrade than with apt-get?
Fungi4All composed on 2017-07-19 15:18 (UTC-0400):
>> mrma...@earthlink.net composed:
...
>> Did you miss that in Stretch apt is preferred to apt-get?
> But will there be different results with apt upgrade than with apt-get?
Will: I have no idea.
Can:Yes.
Apt and apt-get are not
On Wed 19 Jul 2017 at 15:18:20 -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> > From: mrma...@earthlink.net
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
> >> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> >> etc., but get no security or
> From: mrma...@earthlink.net
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
>> etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
>> this unusual. Did a mail list
On 19-07-17, Felix Miata wrote:
> Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
>
> > Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> > etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> > this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for
Patrick Bartek composed on 2017-07-19 10:29 (UTC-0700):
> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this, but didn't find
> anything specific. Or
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:29:02AM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this, but didn't find
> anything
On 19-07-17, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
> etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
> this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this, but didn't find
> anything specific. Or did I miss the
Getting no results from apt-get upgrade after a week. Can install apps,
etc., but get no security or stretch-update "fixes," etc. I find
this unusual. Did a mail list archive search for this, but didn't find
anything specific. Or did I miss the solution?
My Test Setup:
Stretch Stable 64-bit
On 2017-06-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:01:30AM +, Curt wrote:
>> Because of the pedagogical interest of the thing, for those who come
>> after us, for posterity's sake, I wanted the OP to give us a complete
>> description of what occurred, rather
101 - 200 of 632 matches
Mail list logo