On 4/10/23 11:12, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
Perhaps set AuthenticationMethods to publickey,keyboard-interactive in
sshd_config? Do read the full description of that parameter in the
manpage for other things that might interest you.
I finally managed to get my desired public key and google
On Wed, Oct 04 2023 at 10:08:14 AM, jeremy ardley
wrote:
> I have set up a server with sshd allowing public key access. I also
> set up google authenticator in pam by putting this line at the head of
> /etc/pam.d/sshd
>
> auth required pam_google_authenticator.so
>
> If I
I have set up a server with sshd allowing public key access. I also set
up google authenticator in pam by putting this line at the head of
/etc/pam.d/sshd
auth required pam_google_authenticator.so
If I connect to the server without a public key I get the authenticator
prompt and then
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:44:54PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2022-11-14, wrote:
> >
> >> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/428
> >
> > Is there a non-javascript-ey way to look at those issues?
> >
>
>
> Mutt crashes with SIGSEGV when uid -variable is NULL in
> pgp_gpgme_extrace_keys().
>
On 2022-11-14, wrote:
>
>> https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/428
>
> Is there a non-javascript-ey way to look at those issues?
>
Mutt crashes with SIGSEGV when uid -variable is NULL in
pgp_gpgme_extrace_keys().
Found in Mutt 2.0.5 (Debian 11 + 2.0.5-4.1+deb11u1).
Reproducible in:
2.1
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:46:25PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2022-11-14 11:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > If anyone figures out a way to make mutt NOT segfault when reading this
> > type of email, I'd love to hear it.
>
> Upgrading to 2.2.8 or later should do the trick. I can confirm
7;d love to hear it.
No problem here on bullseye with mutt "Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21)", but
that might be because I'm unconcerned about checking signatures, so
something might be uninstalled or unconfigured. Here's what I see
when Gökşin Akdeniz's second message is read:
--✄---
On 2022-11-14 11:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> If anyone figures out a way to make mutt NOT segfault when reading this
> type of email, I'd love to hear it.
Upgrading to 2.2.8 or later should do the trick. I can confirm that
mutt 2.2.9-1 in unstable no longer segfaults displaying the message
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 07:33:00PM +0300, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
>
>
> 14.11.2022 15:26 tarihinde Anssi Saari yazdı:
>
> >
> > So does mutt try to check the PGP signature in Gökşin's message and
> > crash due to that or some other issue?
> >
>
> I use Thunderbird for reading, composing,sending
s why mutt and GnuPG had troubles.
OpenPGP_0x648AAD2AAA3BAD5F_and_old_rev.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
steve writes:
> Le 14-11-2022, à 08:58:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
>>On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>> Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
>>> That's weird.
>>
>>Confirmed.
>
> Here too.
>
> mutt 2.2.7 (2022-08-
Henning Follmann wrote:
Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
That's weird.
When I save the message as attachment, and run gnupg over it, I get this
error message
| gpg: CRC error; 3B73F1 - DC33B7
| gpg: quoted printable character in armor - probably a buggy MTA has been
Le 14-11-2022, à 08:58:02 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
That's weird.
Confirmed.
Here too.
mutt 2.2.7 (2022-08-07)
EAA9 2984 3258 9D76 DA87 E80D 6294 BE9B
Untested proposal:
If none of the method given so far work for getting that public key, i
would try the link in line
pub rsa4096/DA87E80D6294BE9B 2011-01-05 [SC]
of
https://www.debian.org/CD/verify
I.e.
wget https://www.debian.org/CD/key-DA87E80D6
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:47AM +0100, Henning Follmann wrote:
[...]
> Mutt crashes trying to open this post (while opening gnupg).
> That's weird.
Confirmed.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> >
> > gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
> > Public Key
> >
>
> Debian public keys are listed on web pages for downloads. Here is the link
> for download page with checksums and public keys.
>
> https://www.debian.org/download
>
&
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 07:27:21PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> Still strugglng. command suggested returns new key but no user id - skipped
>
Please do not top post, especially not if answers were posted
properly in a chronological way.
here is what you should try:
gpg --keyserver keyring.debian
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
I thought to skip this step and tried
gpg --verify SHA515SUMS.sign.txt debian-11.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso with
the result Can't open signed data debian-11.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso
Clearly I am making some eleme
tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
Debian public keys are listed on web pages for downloads. Here is the
link for download page with checksums and public keys.
https://www.debian.org/download
Keys:
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd
Hello,
13.11.2022 22:14 tarihinde Thomas George yazdı:
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the iso
and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
Debian public keys are
On 13/11/2022 19:14, Thomas George wrote:
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the
iso and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
I thought to skip this step and tried
I want to do a new verified instillation of a debian iso. I have the iso
and SHA512SUMS.sign.txt and SHHA512SUMS.txt and have tried
gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign.txt SHA512SUMS.txt with the result No
Public Key
I thought to skip this step and tried
gpg --verify SHA515SUMS.sign.txt debian
On 12/6/2021 9:32 AM, Adriel Peng wrote:
Hello
Sorry this is maybe not the debian question...
I have changed my github username today, after that I run this command in
local machine to update the remote url:
git remote set-url origin new.git.url/here
And I even run these two in local repo:
Hello
Sorry this is maybe not the debian question...
I have changed my github username today, after that I run this command in
local machine to update the remote url:
git remote set-url origin new.git.url/here
And I even run these two in local repo:
git config --global user.email "n...@mail.
Hi.
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 11:30:26PM +0530, Bapi Dey wrote:
> I am using deb.debian.org
>
> I need a Keyring for my apt. I am not able to find pub key of
> 8B48AD6246925553.
>
> I use apt-key adv --keyserver http://keyring.debian.org --recv-keys
apt-key adv --keyserver http://keys.gn
I am using deb.debian.org
I need a Keyring for my apt. I am not able to find pub key of
8B48AD6246925553.
I use apt-key adv --keyserver http://keyring.debian.org --recv-keys
But return error:- no valid OpenPGP data found. Total number process 0.
What does "apt policy debian-archive-keyring" show? Which version (if
any) do you have installed?
You could also try "apt install debian-archive-keyring"
This should clear up the issues with stretch-updates, but not the
virtualbox repository. For that you'll need to find, verify and import
the re
Le 09/01/2018 à 07:33, Josh W. a écrit :
> I keep having the issue of no public key available and I don’t know what
> I should do…. Back up my computer and reinstall or is there a way to
> patch it up. I am attaching a file that shows what I am going through. I
> ran into all this th
Hi,
besides the good advise of John Doe about verifying an ISO, it should be
stated that "no public key available" during installation is not a typical
sign for a damaged ISO.
I'd rather suspect its intentional content being not being correct or maybe
the package mirror server
On 1/9/2018 7:33 AM, Josh W. wrote:
I keep having the issue of no public key available and I don’t know what I
should do…. Back up my computer and reinstall or is there a way to patch it
up. I am attaching a file that shows what I am going through. I ran into
all this this time will trying to
I keep having the issue of no public key available and I don’t know what I
should do…. Back up my computer and reinstall or is there a way to patch it
up. I am attaching a file that shows what I am going through. I ran into
all this this time will trying to install wine and adding to the
On 24/08/17 10:21, Dan Norton wrote:
> Oops - forgot to try GNU Stow. Another time maybe.
In this case, you used the package manager, so there is no need for
stow. GNU Stow is useful when installing manually, for example, when one
compiles from source.
> Thank you, Mario, for your help. Great dis
On 08/23/2017 10:07 PM, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
On 23/08/17 20:52, Dan Norton wrote:
Since borg is a self-contained binary, perhaps it does not need to be
formally declared as a package in Debian 8.
There is no relation between “is self-contained binary” and whether it
is in Debian. Aga
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:07:02PM -0500, Mario Castelán Castro wrote:
> There is no relation between “is self-contained binary” and whether it
> is in Debian. Again, borgbackup is available in Debian 8, but you have
> to enable backports.
Which, for those who don't know, you do by following the i
x27;6D5B
> EF9A DD20 7580 5747 B70F 9F88 FB52 FAF7 B393'
> [sudo] password for dan:
> gpg: /root/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
> gpg: error reading key: public key not found
Ah, sorry. The correct command is “gpg --keyserver
'hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net&#x
On 23/08/17 19:34, Dan Norton wrote:
> I'm all for that, but unfortunately...
> $ apt-cache show borgbackup | grep ^Homepage
> E: No packages found
>
> Before posting I searched for borg and because nothing turned up I tried
> to install it another way. It's supposed to be a self-contained binary;
rver 'hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net' --fingerprint
'6D5B EF9A DD20 7580 5747 B70F 9F88 FB52 FAF7 B393'
[sudo] password for dan:
gpg: /root/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: error reading key: public key not found
where have I seen that before? :-)
Since borg is a se
keys to apt-get.
> If nothing is amiss so far (a big if), the problem now is:
>
> $ gpg --verify borg-linux64.asc borg-linux64
> gpg: Signature made Sun 23 Jul 2017 07:23:38 PM EDT using RSA key ID
> 51F78E01
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
8E01
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
How to get the public key?
See
<https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/support.html#security-contact>.
A key may claim to belong to X person, but you should not take the key's
word for granted. You must verify that X person
lem now is:
$ gpg --verify borg-linux64.asc borg-linux64
gpg: Signature made Sun 23 Jul 2017 07:23:38 PM EDT using RSA key ID
51F78E01
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
How to get the public key?
Thanks, - Dan
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Charles E. Blair wrote:
>When I type "apt-get upgrade" I get
> this message, and things stop:
>
> W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs:
> EF0F382A1A7B6500
>
>I hope there is a simple fix.
You can ignor
When I type "apt-get upgrade" I get
this message, and things stop:
W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs:
EF0F382A1A7B6500
I hope there is a simple fix.
M EDT using RSA key ID
6294BE9B
| gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
This was not the outcome I was hoping for, but I am not sure what
to do next.
Hello Wes,
It seems the key ID 6294BE9B is found in
/usr/share/keyring/debian-role-keys.gpg [1]; .iso should verify with
that.
I wa
| hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2014-07-24)
| subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID DA87E80D6294BE9B)
| data: [4096 bits]
| gpgv: assuming signed data in `SHA512SUMS'
| gpgv: Signature made Thu 24 Jul 2014 09:54:21 AM EDT using RSA key ID 6294BE9B
| gpgv: Can't check signatu
: [4096 bits]
| gpgv: assuming signed data in `SHA512SUMS'
| gpgv: Signature made Thu 24 Jul 2014 09:54:21 AM EDT using RSA key ID 6294BE9B
| gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
This was not the outcome I was hoping for, but I am not sure what to
do next.
Hello Wes,
It seems
://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-7.6.0-amd64-standard.iso
Before doing this, however, I would like to verify the authenticity of
the SHA512SUMS file which I believe I obtained from here:
[snipped lots of stuff]
| gpgv: Can't check signature: public ke
[4096 bits]
> | gpgv: assuming signed data in `SHA512SUMS'
> | gpgv: Signature made Thu 24 Jul 2014 09:54:21 AM EDT using RSA key ID
> 6294BE9B
> | gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> This was not the outcome I was hoping for, but I am not sure what
/SHA512SUMS.sign
But I am stuck now, because I cannot find the corresponding public
key, and don't know where to start looking for it.
What I have done so far:
I installed the debian-keyring package, and then I ran this:
| $ gpgv --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg -vv --
SHA512SUMS
cannot find the corresponding public
key, and don't know where to start looking for it.
What I have done so far:
I installed the debian-keyring package, and then I ran this:
| $ gpgv --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg -vv -- SHA512SUMS.sign
| gpgv: armor: BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
|
Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:09:56 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
>> Using apt-get's GUI, I receive
>>
>> ==
>> `W: GPG error: http://www.backports.org lenny-backports Release: The
>> following signatures couldn't be verified beca
ts.org lenny-backports Release: The
>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
>> available: NO_PUBKEY EA8E8B2116BA136C'
>> ==
>>
>> Any idea(s)? I am using a standard /etc/apt/sources.list. Thanks.
>>
>
> www.
On Ma, 29 iun 10, 12:09:56, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using apt-get's GUI, I receive
There is no apt-get GUI, do you mean aptitude?
> ==
> `W: GPG error: http://www.backports.org lenny-backports Release: The
> following signatures couldn't be verified b
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:09:56 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Using apt-get's GUI, I receive
>
> ==
> `W: GPG error: http://www.backports.org lenny-backports Release: The
> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
> available: NO_PUBKEY E
On 2010-01-07 17:42 +0100, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On 2010-01-07 at 11:04:18 -0500, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Install the debian-keyring package.
>
> Thank you! That solves the problem. But it requires 26M of disk space!
> Wow! It's just a collection of keys, right? Why is it so big?
> Are there
On 2010-01-07 at 11:04:18 -0500, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Why do you run apt-get source as root?
I am used to being root when I run apt-get because this is required
when installing a binary package. I assumed (perhaps incorrectly)
that installing a source package also required root privileges.
But s
ey ID 12066207
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> Obviously I need to find and import the relevant public key.
> I don't know where to find the key, nor how to import it.
> I searched the internet and found some hits on "gpg 12066207",
> but
d
gpg: WARNING: options in `/root/.gnupg/gpg.conf' are not yet active during this
run
gpg: Signature made Sun 23 Nov 2008 09:06:32 PM EST using DSA key ID 12066207
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
Obviously I need to find and import the relevant public key.
I don't kn
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 01:06:22PM +0530, Sudev Barar wrote:
> 2009/3/28 Daniel Dalton :
> > How do I set up public key on linux? And then how do I sign files and
> > emails? I have read up on this, so understand the basics I think, but
> > just wondering what tools I use
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: andreimpope...@gmail.com
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: public key
>Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:33:51 +0300
>
>>On Sun,29.Mar.09, 09:44:33, Daniel Dalton wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Okay
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 05:21:47PM +1100, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I set up public key on linux? And then how do I sign files and
> emails? I have read up on this, so understand the basics I think, but
> just wondering what tools I use for: decrypting files, e
On Sun,29.Mar.09, 09:44:33, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Okay, I've created my public key with gpg, how can I get mutt to use it
> now so I can sign all messages? And how do I encrypt mail?
From my ~/.mutt/muttrc
# GPG stuff
# sign all, encrypting can be selected b
Daniel Dalton writes:
[...]
> How can someone verify I created the file and the signiture wasn't just
> copied and pasted?
http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Hi,
Okay, I've created my public key with gpg, how can I get mutt to use it
now so I can sign all messages? And how do I encrypt mail?
And when I sign a file, what's stopping someone else from doing:
cp daniel's_signedfile.extention.sign ourfilename.txt.sign
How can someone verif
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: sba...@gmail.com
>To: d.dal...@iinet.net.au, debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: public key
>Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:06:22 +0530
>
>>2009/3/28 Daniel Dalton :
>>> How do I set up public key on linux? And t
2009/3/28 Daniel Dalton :
> How do I set up public key on linux? And then how do I sign files and
> emails? I have read up on this, so understand the basics I think, but
> just wondering what tools I use for: decrypting files, encrypting files,
> signing files and actually gener
Hi,
How do I set up public key on linux? And then how do I sign files and
emails? I have read up on this, so understand the basics I think, but
just wondering what tools I use for: decrypting files, encrypting files,
signing files and actually generating my key?
What is the difference between
On Sunday 15 February 2009 16:24:36 Rick Thomas wrote:
> On "http://www.backports.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=instructions"; it
> says to do this:
> wget -O - http://backports.org/debian/archive.key | apt-key add -
>
> I did, and all is well...
(1) There was a debian-backports-keyring for Etch.
Hmmm... "When all else fails, read the instructions."
On "http://www.backports.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=instructions"; it
says to do this:
wget -O - http://backports.org/debian/archive.key | apt-key add -
I did, and all is well...
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
s
Date: February 15, 2009 4:39:22 PM EST
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: lenny-backports public key is not available
Package: backports
Severity: normal
To celebrate the relesase of Lenny as Stable, I added "volatile" and
"backports" to my
sources.list file. When
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:31:27 +0100
Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Lanitz:
> > "Zaki Akhmad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Could you hint me some information, which server have exchanging
> >> public key service?
Frank Lanitz:
> "Zaki Akhmad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Could you hint me some information, which server have exchanging
>> public key service? I'd like to do some experiment exchanging public
>> key then use it to encrypt and decrypt email
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:17:50 +0700
"Zaki Akhmad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Frank Lanitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > You can use gpg --send $keyID to send your public key to a
> > keyserver or use gpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Frank Lanitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can use gpg --send $keyID to send your public key to a keyserver or
> use gpg --export-key to export the key to e.g. a file. Consulting man
> page of Gn
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:58:41 +0700
"Zaki Akhmad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have generate public and private key. I am using gpg --gen-key
> command. How do I export my public key so that available to the
> public?
You can use gpg --send $keyID to send your pub
Dear all,
I have generate public and private key. I am using gpg --gen-key
command. How do I export my public key so that available to the
public?
--
Zaki Akhmad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 00:46:31 +0700, Zaki Akhmad wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to make mirror debian repository to my portable harddisk.
> I am having difficulty with public key. Which public key I should
> export? To where?
>
> Here's the result after I execute deb
Hi
I am trying to make mirror debian repository to my portable harddisk.
I am having difficulty with public key. Which public key I should
export? To where?
Here's the result after I execute debmirror
Mirroring to main from ftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]//debian/
Arches: i386
Dists: sid
Sections:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 06:44:02PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Is there a tool that'd help me create a sheet full of the fingerprint of
> my public key?
aptitude install signing-party
Then you can use gpg-key2ps
--
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tza
Il giorno Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:44:02 +
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Is there a tool that'd help me create a sheet full of the fingerprint of
> my public key?
Sure, just:
# apt-get install signing-party
and you'll have a nice /usr/bin/gpg-key2ps wh
Is there a tool that'd help me create a sheet full of the fingerprint of
my public key?
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus．therning＠gmail．com
http://therning.org/magnus
What if I don't want to obey th
> sshfs ip.address.of.host: mountpoint -o
> IdentityFile="~/.ssh/id_remote"
>
> The reference from the sshfs help output and manpage is a
> bit obscure
> refering the reader to the ssh_config man page for ssh
> option where
> IdentityFile is described.
Better method: specify the identify file per
* Csányi Pál <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 17 13:31 -0500]:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:10:26PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * Atis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 17 10:55 -0500]:
> > > On 8/17/07, Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
* Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 17 13:11 -0500]:
> * Atis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 17 10:55 -0500]:
> > On 8/17/07, Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have my SSH set up to use only public key authentication between my
> >
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:10:26PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Atis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 17 10:55 -0500]:
> > On 8/17/07, Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have my SSH set up to use only public key authentication between my
> > >
* Atis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007 Aug 17 10:55 -0500]:
> On 8/17/07, Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have my SSH set up to use only public key authentication between my
> > laptop and my remote host--no password fallback, no PAM. So, I
> > initiate
On 8/17/07, Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have my SSH set up to use only public key authentication between my
> laptop and my remote host--no password fallback, no PAM. So, I
> initiate a session using:
>
> $ ssh -i .ssh/id_remote remote.host.ip.address
>
I have my SSH set up to use only public key authentication between my
laptop and my remote host--no password fallback, no PAM. So, I
initiate a session using:
$ ssh -i .ssh/id_remote remote.host.ip.address
Then I am prompted for the password of the .ssh/id_remote file which
resides on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
[snip]
>>> Would you have the key for Debian-Multimedia in the "Debian Archive
>>> Keyring"?
>> No, but I might make it a little easier for Debian newbies to find it in
>> the first place. Something like a simple script that people
0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >>>>> Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
> >>>>> W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
> >>>>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public k
, 2007 at 11:21:56PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>>>>> Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
>>>>>> W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
>>>>>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public
gt;>>> Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
>>>>> W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
>>>>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
>>>>> not available: N
> >>
> >>> W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
> >>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
> >>> not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
> >>> W: You may want to run apt-get update t
Hi Rick,
On Saturday 14 April 2007 19:33, Rick Thomas wrote:
> 1) How do I import the public key for volatile? (If it's in the fine
> manual, then please point me to it so I can RTFM)
To be executed as root:
gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de --recv-keys AC583520
gpg --fingerprin
the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You don't have the Debian Volatile public key on your apt keyring.
Get etch-volatile.asc from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-volatile/ and then use "apt-key
: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
>>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
>>> not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
>>> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
>>
>
cause the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
You need to import the public key for volatile.debian.org
separately using
apt-key if you want to use this repo with secure apt, the key is not
included in the de
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:21:56PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
> W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
> not ava
On 4/14/07, Rick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE5
Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct
This will fix that:
gpg --recv-keys A70DAF536070D3A1 && (gpg --export -a A70DAF536070D3A1 | apt-key add -)
something about keys changing...
Cheers,
Kev
Thanks. That solved it -- the warnings are gone.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
