Is scala reflect 2.13.6 actually about scala 2.13, or is it just a coincidence
of the numbering that their sub-version number just rolled up to 13?
From: GitBox
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 12:55 PM
To: comm...@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: [GitHub] [daffodil] ste
According to the scala-relfect pom [1], scala-reflect 2.13.6 depends on
scala-library 2.13.6, so I think it's the same as scala 2.13 and they
need to be upgraded together. I'd guess that scala-reflect is split
into a separate jar because it's still considered experimental.
[1]
https://search.mave
All,
There are currently 224 Daffodil JIRA tickets resolved in previous releases,
all but 2 from v2.5.0 (1/2/2020) and earlier.
I want to check with the group to see if it would be acceptable to close these
tickets with "Closed due to no activity."
Any other suggestions would be appreciated.
So some of these errors seem to be font & charset related.
I installed the japanese language pack, so I have unicode character capability,
but perhaps I have to set something up to tell it to use unicode and a sensible
font which has the Kanji characters that are in our tests, for example.
___
I'm not sure where it exists on windows, but if you run
git config --global core.autocrlf true
then it should enable it globally. I think you could also try
reinstallting git for Windows. Last I installed git on Windows (a long
time ago) I think the installer let me pick how to handle line endi
The XML comments was definitely part of it. Found that one and fixed it with
the override def comment(..) as you suggest.
There are still other tests failing though.
I have been spinning up a windows dev environment and I noticed that the
comments contain CRLFs on windows, and likely due to aut
Finished the review and I didn't find anything, but I just noticed that
some of the failed TMDL tests have infosets that include comments, that
include newlines.
I'm guessing these comments aren't stripped out by the loader and also
aren't normalized. So when git autocrlf kicks in, it changes thes
The VOTE to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2 is now
closed. The vote passes with 7 +1 votes, and NO -1 votes.
The VOTE thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9a3d0a52f863b29db3c0b3c1e5b212f72b5fc1074510f38697f4449a%40%3Cdev.daffodil.apache.org%3E
+1's were:
John Interrante (binding)
S
+1
I checked:
[OK] links in email are correct
[OK] verified Summary of Changes pages (maven, sbt and download)
[OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct
[OK] RAT check passes
On 5/14/21 3:26 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
All distr
Vote +1
Verified and closed all "Resolved" v3.1.0 JIRA tickets.
Verified all Daffodil sub-project SBT test suites execute successfully.
Verified all nightly performance test schemas compile and save successfully on
java 8, 11 and 16.
Verified the nightly performance test suite successfully execut
I've talked to a couple others that are still reviewing and planning to
vote. Just giving a chance for extra votes to come in and make sure
there are no issues. Especially since much of the 72 hours was over the
weekend and people may not have had time yesterday.
On 5/18/21 9:24 AM, Interrante, Jo
More than 72 hours have passed and we're up to 5 +1's now with no 0's or -1's.
When will the release come out? :-)
John
-Original Message-
From: John Wass
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:55 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: EXT: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1
I
I'm reviewing the PR now, I'll let you know if I see anything that jumps
out at me.
My guess is this probably an autocrlf issue. It's possible your windows
git installation didn't set this to true so git isn't replacing LF with
CRLF. If you change the core.autocrlf git config option to true and
re
My PR https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/560
Keeps failing its tests on MS-Windows.
I am unable to reproduce the failures on Linux obviously.
But... I am also unable to reproduce these failures on MS-Windows.
I have installed sbt, git, intellij idea, emacs, etc. all on MS-Windows. When I
+1
I checked
[OK] RPM install in centos 8 and fedora 32
[OK] spot check schematron validation and svrl output
[OK] misc CLI operations
[OK] hash of each download matches
[OK] rat check passes
[OK] use of staged artifacts in existing applications
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:26 PM Steve Lawrence
15 matches
Mail list logo