ledge Graph entities.
>
>
> *Your help will be appreciated highly.*
>
> Many thanks
> Gautam Kanaujia
> India
>
--
*Doug Turnbull **| CTO* | OpenSource Connections
<http://opensourceconnections.com>, LLC | 240.476.9983
Author: Relevant Search <http://manning.com/t
data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> of whether attachments are marked as such.
>
&g
cts (downstream from Lucene).
>> >
>> > The situation we find ourselves now is different to what it was
>> > before: recent and ongoing development for the most part falls within
>> > Solr or Lucene exclusively.
>> >
>> >
>> > This e-mail is for discussing the idea and presenting arguments/
&g
t; >
> > 2) Complementary relationship
> > When Lucene and Solr are built together, Solr can always maintain the
> latest Lucene.
> > In my personal opinion, it's a great advantage of Solr.
> > Because Solr doesn't have to suffer from Lucene API changes and has
> latest library.
ith the Lucene community as an involved and vested consumer.
> >>
> >> Erik
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Atri
> > Apache Concerted
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional
gt; Hmm, just to clarify, this is not an "again" sort of situation: Solr was
> not a top-level project before. It was and still is a sub-project of
> Apache Lucene.
>
> And the proposal is to now split it out as its own (new) top-level
> project, Apache Solr.
>
> Mike Mc
o join David
>> Smiley as co-author on the first Solr book, we went on and did a total of
>> three editions of that book. Phew!
>>
>> Once I got to sit on stage as a judge for Stump the Chump, it was Erick,
>> Erik, and Eric ;-)
>>
>> After doing Solr for a g
do you guys think about making all the
>>>> readmes to markdown file rather than text files, and a standard template?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Regards:
>>>> > Pinkesh Sharma
>>>>
>>>>
&g
t;> Why should I wait weeks/months for some explicit review
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ask for a review, which as this document says is really just a LGTM
>>>>> threshold of approval, not even a real code review. Given your reputation
>>>>> of writi
her it happens
>> >> quickly or slowly. It might be the kind of thing we just don't want to
>> >> try and do.
>> >>
>> >> I'm not opposed to the idea, and I might even be able to help, but it's
>> >> going to need a lot of buy-in from th
;
> >
> > -----
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> --
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16859165#comment-16859165
]
Doug Turnbull commented on LUCENE-8841:
---
Big +1, though I suspect it would be very hard
), Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flinkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdavidwsmiley=02%7C01%7Cpedramr%40microsoft.com%7Cd4ac932962eb42ef813e08d69e8216cd%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6368706
gt; > Pedram
>
>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
>
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer (PMC)
I like that idea Alan. The trick is for QueryBuilder's 'newSynonymQuery' to
be useful in that context, you need to pass terms with metadata down to the
subclass. This is what I started working on a few weeks ago:
https://github.com/o19s/lucene-solr/commit/0fc3930671ef002cfbb5e3d52b6f8edc3715bf14
defining practices / patterns / tools that enable these things in
Lucene-based search. Some may require no work, or some may require
supporting functionality.
-Doug
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 9:23 AM Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> I agree there is a tension between
y have a TermFrequencyAttribute to alter the frequency of a term
> when
> > indexing so we could have the same mechanism for query term boosting ?
> >
> > Le dim. 18 nov. 2018 à 02:24, Doug Turnbull <
> > dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> a écrit :
> >
> >
rity ordering you guys came up with.
That's pretty neat!
-Doug
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 7:20 AM Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Great thoughts Jim - +1 to your idea
>
> One brainstorm I had, is taxonomies have a kind of 'ideal scoring' that I
> think wou
use when they produce stacked
>> tokens and that the QueryBuilder checks when he builds the SynonymQuery. We
>> already have a TermFrequencyAttribute to alter the frequency of a term when
>> indexing so we could have the same mechanism for query term boosting ?
>>
&g
xity you want in a
> subclass.
> However I think there is another area we need to fix, the scoring of
> multi-terms synonyms is broken (compared to the SynonymQuery) and could be
> improved so we need something similar than the SynonymQuery that handles
> multi phrases.
>
on the roadmap...
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 1:15 AM J. Delgado
wrote:
> What about the use of word embeddings (see
>
> https://towardsdatascience.com/introduction-to-word-embedding-and-word2vec-652d0c2060fa)
> to compute word similarity?
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 5:52 AM Doug T
Hey folks,
I wanted to open up a discussion about a change to the usage of
SynonymQuery. The goal here is to have a broader library of queries that
can address other cases where related terms occupy the same position but
don't have the same meaning (such as hypernyms, hyponyms, meronyms,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16688424#comment-16688424
]
Doug Turnbull commented on LUCENE-8563:
---
Ah... I assumed "Adrien has his performance hat on&q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16688382#comment-16688382
]
Doug Turnbull commented on LUCENE-8563:
---
Thanks [~jpountz] - My feeling is if Lucene has something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16687268#comment-16687268
]
Doug Turnbull commented on LUCENE-8563:
---
I feel perhaps one way forward is to create a second
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16684091#comment-16684091
]
Doug Turnbull commented on LUCENE-8563:
---
For the sake of this discussion, here's a desmos graph
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16684080#comment-16684080
]
Doug Turnbull edited comment on LUCENE-8563 at 11/12/18 5:01 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16684080#comment-16684080
]
Doug Turnbull commented on LUCENE-8563:
---
It would modify ordering when dealing with multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16682427#comment-16682427
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-12238:
--
What can we do to get this functionality into Solr? (My vote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16463830#comment-16463830
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-12238:
--
Just want to say I've been watching this feature and
+1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16278893#comment-16278893
]
Doug Turnbull commented on LUCENE-7996:
---
Just FYI for upstream impact, LTR models tend to output
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16277462#comment-16277462
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-11662:
--
Thanks for helping with the change David!
I would probably
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16275741#comment-16275741
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-11698:
--
I'm considering adding query time config to field aliases
tc.)
> [asciidoctor:convert] asciidoctor: ERROR: solr-glossary.adoc: line 1:
> invalid part, must have at least one section (e.g., chapter, appendix, etc.)
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Doug Turnbull <
> dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks.
gai...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> MG>see below
>
>
> --
> *From:* Doug Turnbull <dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 1, 2017 9:17 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Solr Ref Guide not building
>
> He
doing wrong, please let me know
A more complete log can be found here
https://gist.github.com/softwaredoug/36fe87f0d63403e7be22d5a2ff8af073
Thanks for any help
-Doug
--
Consultant, OpenSource Connections. Contact info at
http://o19s.com/about-us/doug-turnbull/; Free/Busy (http://bit.ly/dougs_cal)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doug Turnbull updated SOLR-11698:
-
Summary: Query-time per-field query settings (ie analyzers,
autoGeneratePhraseQueries, etc
Doug Turnbull created SOLR-11698:
Summary: Query-time fieldType query settings (ie analyzers,
autoGeneratePhraseQueries, etc)
Key: SOLR-11698
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11698
bscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Consultant, OpenSource Connections. Contact info at
http://o19s.com/about-us/doug-turnbull/; Free/Busy (http://bit.ly/dougs_cal)
ave
> one chain, with some qualifier on each element to say to which named chains
> it applies to (if not all)? I dunno; trade-offs, trade-offs.
> >
> > ~ David
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:03 AM Doug Turnbull <
> dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wro
n title text=edismax
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:50 AM Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> I wonder if there's been any thought by the community to refactoring
> fieldTypes to allow multiple query-time analyzers per indexed field?
> Currently, to get di
bly other query
parsers) quite a bit
Any thoughts?
Best
-Doug
--
Consultant, OpenSource Connections. Contact info at
http://o19s.com/about-us/doug-turnbull/; Free/Busy (http://bit.ly/dougs_cal)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16263377#comment-16263377
]
Doug Turnbull edited comment on SOLR-11662 at 11/22/17 9:31 PM:
PR updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16263377#comment-16263377
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-11662:
--
PR updated, patch can be viewed here
https://github.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16262567#comment-16262567
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-11662:
--
Great! And that would actually let me submit an ES patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16262468#comment-16262468
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-11662:
--
Thanks Adrien! Yes, it could be moved to SolrQueryParser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doug Turnbull updated SOLR-11662:
-
Description:
This patch customizes the query-time behavior when query terms overlap
positions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261549#comment-16261549
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-11662:
--
Associated pull request https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doug Turnbull updated SOLR-11662:
-
Summary: Make overlapping query term scoring configurable per field type
(was: More than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doug Turnbull updated SOLR-11662:
-
Description:
This patch customizes the query-time behavior when query terms overlap
positions
Doug Turnbull created SOLR-11662:
Summary: More than SynonymQuery: Let overlapping query terms model
hypernym/hyponym relationships
Key: SOLR-11662
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11662
Something I found helpful was to go back to very early Lucene versions.
That let's you see the essential functionality in relatively
straightforward Java code. You can get a sense for how Lucene is
structured. Functionality has been built around this since. The Java has
been battle tested,
Sounds great. I agree!
I can imagine there might be really old client libraries/integrations that
assume XML without sending a wt, but I think it's ok to break those sorts
of things in a major release. And those folks can learn to send wt=xml
-Doug
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:53 PM Trey Grainger
Definitely start with Solr unless you have some specialized use case.
Lucene skills can come up in a Solr context (ie if you wanted to write
plugins)
I would also recommend:
- Solr in Action
- Lucene in Action (out of date, but many concepts still valid)
- Apache Solr Ref Guide (
As an aside, I'm pretty sure if anyone wanted to write a new edition of
Lucene in Action, and you're masochistic enough to write a book for a top
tier tech book publisher, I'd be happy to introduce you to someone at
Manning :)
And Lucene In Action is a very good read, will help you get the big
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15591921#comment-15591921
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-9418:
-
Looking at your patch (I'm not a committer just curious about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15467891#comment-15467891
]
Doug Turnbull commented on LUCENE-7436:
---
Fix is here https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/78
Doug Turnbull created LUCENE-7436:
-
Summary: MinHashFilter has package-local constructor and constants
Key: LUCENE-7436
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7436
Project: Lucene - Core
I see it more of a performance tweak than a relevance thing. matches on
stopwords introduce the potential for many more documents to be scored.
Large collections usually should have a high min-should-match, so more than
likely queries with at least one or two non-stopwords that dramatically
limit
Hi Archit, I would make a strong argument for using Solr unless you have
some exotic requirements.
- Solr has distributed indexing and search built in, building your own
distributed system is non-trivial, just as Mark Miller :)
- Solr comes prebaked with an HTTP API for non search experts to
Is there anyway to maintain inbound links to confluence pages with the new
system? I'm just thinking about all the user group questions, stackoverflow
Qs, and the like that link to cwiki pages.
Is it possible to setup the right redirects for cwiki pages into the new
system?
Doug
On Thu, Aug 18,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15413994#comment-15413994
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-9395:
-
Hmm that won't work, nm as you'd do stats over a relevance score
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15413459#comment-15413459
]
Doug Turnbull edited comment on SOLR-9395 at 8/9/16 12:41 PM:
--
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15413459#comment-15413459
]
Doug Turnbull edited comment on SOLR-9395 at 8/9/16 12:41 PM:
--
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15413459#comment-15413459
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-9395:
-
Thanks [~hossman] and [~dsmiley]
Lots of good ideas. I'm going
Doug Turnbull created SOLR-9395:
---
Summary: Add ceil/floor bounding to stats calculations
Key: SOLR-9395
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9395
Project: Solr
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15397636#comment-15397636
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-9279:
-
+1
> Add greater than, less than, etc in Solr function quer
Issue Type: New Feature
> > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> > Components: search
> >Reporter: Doug Turnbull
> > Fix For: master (7.0)
> >
> > Attachments: SOLR-9279.pa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15396118#comment-15396118
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-9279:
-
Looks great [~dsmiley]! Definitely a big improvement. Appreciate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15394521#comment-15394521
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-9279:
-
[~hossman] Thanks for your help! Great points. -- I think I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doug Turnbull updated SOLR-9279:
Description:
If you use the "if" function query, you'll often expect to be able to use
gr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15363563#comment-15363563
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-9279:
-
Associated Pull request https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr
Doug Turnbull created SOLR-9279:
---
Summary: Add greater than, less than, etc in Solr function queries
Key: SOLR-9279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9279
Project: Solr
Issue
record.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
--
*Doug Turnbull **| *Searc
e dump files, here they are:
>> http://goo.gl/m6q3J8
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> > You can't avoid having the history in SVN. The ASF has one large repo,
>> and
>> > won't be deleting
s commit diff weights... wait for it... 1.3G! I didn't check what
> > it actually was.
> >
> > Will keep you posted.
> >
> > D.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene
unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org');>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev-h...@lucene.apache.org');>
>&
mands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972743#comment-14972743
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-8201:
-
+1!
These little hints in the admin UI can hint at problems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14959677#comment-14959677
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-7341:
-
I am really looking forward to this patch. It has a lot
new one.
> Candidates:
> >> - "External Configuration via XML” does perhaps not impress much
> anymore.
> >> - "Extensible Plugin Architecture” is almost a duplicate of "Powerful
> Extensions"
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jan Høydahl,
ev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
>
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.or
CVS works, see IndexWriter:
http://lucene.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/lucene/lucene/com/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java?view=log
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Doug Turnbull
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com wrote:
I have no dog in the svn vs git debate honestly.
I want to say how
I have no dog in the svn vs git debate honestly.
I want to say how important it is to keep healthy history. I recently went
on a bit of code archeology dig recently to figure out why something in
Lucene was done the way it was. It was handy that the history went as far
back as it did, but I had
as I think we are on to something useful.
-- Joaquin
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Doug Turnbull
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com wrote:
Hi Joaquin
Very neat, thanks for sharing,
Viewing search relevance as something akin to a classification problem is
actually a driving
to support it (only elastic search for now):
https://github.com/sdhu/elasticsearch-prediction
-- J
--
*Doug Turnbull **| *Search Relevance Consultant | OpenSource Connections,
LLC | 240.476.9983 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com
Author: Taming Search http://manning.com/turnbull from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13931319#comment-13931319
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-5800:
-
Thanks for the patch Stefan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13772151#comment-13772151
]
Doug Turnbull commented on SOLR-4812:
-
+1 I've also been able to recreate
Doug Turnbull created SOLR-5256:
---
Summary: Send multiple queries through highlighter
Key: SOLR-5256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5256
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doug Turnbull updated SOLR-5256:
Attachment: Solr-5256.patch
Patch to add hl.addlq
Send multiple queries through
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doug Turnbull updated SOLR-5256:
Description:
There's been several times when I wish I could specify multiple queries through
91 matches
Mail list logo
