[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and CCW w/LotW and eQSL?

I checked out the configuration file that you suggest but the release date on it was 2008 and it doesn't have Contestia in it. It's the same group of ADIF modes that I had previously so I must have had the up to date file already. Anyway I suggested to ARRL that they consider updating the file t

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and CCW w/LotW and eQSL?

Have you downloaded the configuration update for TQSL that supports a wide variety of extra modes. I'm not sure that ALE400 is included, but I know CONTESTIA is Log into your account on the LoTW website, go to "Your Account", then "Your Certificates"...click on the "Download current TQSL Confi

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and CCW w/LotW and eQSL?

Hi Jeremy: I asked LOTW help the exact question the other day and this is their response: "Open TQSL Select FILE - PREFERENCES - ADIF MODES Click the ADD button on right. In the mode window enter the mode as it is expressed in your logging program. Use the drop down menu to select the mode that

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 quick guide - Last Multipsk test version

Ed, I've jsut sent you the test version by separate mail. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "ed_hekman" To: Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 12:36 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 quick guide - Last Multipsk test version > Patrick, > > I am unable t

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 quick guide - Last Multipsk test version

Patrick, I am unable to download from your web site. Is there a North American site that I can download it from? Thanks, Ed WB6YTE --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" wrote: > > Hello Tony and all, > > Thanks Tony for the nice quick guide. > > For information, the last

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 testing

Is the freq 14074.0 USB +1000Hz? Tks, de Rich/N2JR --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley wrote: > > Both VE5EOC and VE5MU are currently listening on 14074, ALE400. Both > stations are in DO70QK, about 2km apart. > > > > Both stations are available for connect, and both statio

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and 141a - talk about JNOS ...

linked to UI-VIEW through the KISS link (of course, Multipsk can be used alone without KISS link). 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: ""José A. Amador"" To: Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:27 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and 141a - talk about JNO

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and 141a - talk about JNOS ...

Hello Vojtech, > One installed a http proxy on his computer, which initiated > ax.25 connection to a server, queried for a page, the other > side compressed it with gzip, sent over ax.25 channel, the > http proxy decompressed and fed to the browser ... Interesting. I did a similar thing back in N

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and 141a - talk about JNOS ...

Hi Maiko. > I'm not sure what mode I would want to use it for though. I even > considered using JNOS as an IP bridge using the MultiPSK modem to > transport RAW IP (more or less) frames over HF, as one example > of what was on my mind. I played with http over ax.25 slow 1200bd line. I wrote a sim

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and 141a - talk about JNOS ...

Maiko, good to see you here. MultiPSK already has a KISS interface. It has been used for APRS successfully so far. 73, Jose, CO2JA -- maiko4 escribió: > Good day to everyone, > > I am new to this group - could not help but notice JNOS mentioned. > > Jose stated earlier : > > >> I believe

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and 141a - talk about JNOS ...

Good day to everyone, I am new to this group - could not help but notice JNOS mentioned. Jose stated earlier : > I believe that the simplest is not reinventing the wheel, and > using MultiPSK as a modem, using traditional BBS programs as > the mail application. Believe it or not, using MultiPSK

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and FAE

Hello Rick and John, > when to use ALE 400 and when to use FAE 400. Personally, I would rather I see this as in ALE (but I'm not a specialist): you can do soundings or calls (QRZ for example) to say notify your presence in the band and after the link with a Ham, you both begin exchanging messa

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 on 14.074

+++ Stop calling +++ 73 de LA5VNA Steinar Steinar Aanesland skrev: > Hi all > > Calling on 14.074 in ale400 > > 73 de LA5VNA Steinar >

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 - Narrow band ALE mode now available

You've forgotten about the nasty reality of AGC and receiver overload. For what you say to be true, one must disable the AGC and the receiver must have the dynamic range/overload capability to not fold with the wider bandwidth. If they did we would never need narrow filters. Many rigs have no "off

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 - Narrow band ALE mode now available

Brian, It depends upon what you, or the average ham, are looking for. If you want to do contesting, and if the inertia stays with RTTY, then that is what will remain as a popular mode. A couple of decades ago, many of us found RTTY to be quite interesting and even built TU's to get on HF. Then

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 - Narrow band ALE mode now available

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Brian A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Using a 200 Hz filter instead of 400 or 500 Hz filter gives a 3db > S/N ratio improvment-- PSK or RTTY. It's guaranteed. It is not. Using narrower filter will reduce total noise and out of channel QRM, lowering dynamic

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 - Narrow band ALE mode now available

modern modes as MFSK16, Olivia, ALE have a diversity in time and in frequency). > > About the bands crowded. For this side of the ocean, the digital bands don't seem very crowded except during contests. > It seems there are widely enough room for 400 Hz bandwidth transmissions. >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 - Narrow band ALE mode n ow available

room for 400 Hz bandwidth transmissions. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Brian A To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 1:29 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 - Narrow band ALE mode now available I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt,

RE: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 - Narrow band ALE mode now available

Yes, the laws of physics do get in the way. They say that wider bandwidth is the technique to use. The trick in that situation is that the bandwidth is used by multiple users at the same time. Everyone is background noise to the other guy. Rud Merriam K5RUD ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX http

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 – Narrow ba nd ALE mode now available

ALE 400 and RTTY are not all that different in bandwidth. RTTY is wider than we might like to admit depending upon how you measure the drop off at the edges. The difference is dramatic between the two modes in terms of ability to work under more difficult conditions and deeper into the noise. A

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 – Narrow band ALE mode now available

Hi Brian, At 08:29 AM 11/2/2007, you wrote: >I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt, honest. > Neither is my reply meant to be anything other than pointing out the obvious. >We need narrower bandwidths not wider bandwidths for real progress >with the real life crowded bands. I think that is

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 – Narrow band ALE mode now available

I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt, honest. If one put ALE400 and RTTY side by side for the average ham ALE-400 would be a hard sell. Same speed in twice the bandwidth. I guess one may conclude all the bells and whistles of ALE, ARQ etc are doubling the bandwidth requirements. One can co

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 – Narrow ba nd ALE mode now available

What is your point? LA5VNA Setinar Brian A skrev: > > So one gets the 60wpm of 170Hz shift RTTY for a 400 Hz bandwidth? > > 73 de Brian/K3KO > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > , Mark Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > ALE400 – Narrow ban

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 – Narrow band ALE mode now available

So one gets the 60wpm of 170Hz shift RTTY for a 400 Hz bandwidth? 73 de Brian/K3KO --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Mark Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ALE400 – Narrow band ALE mode now available > > Patrick F6CTE has announced that a narrow band version of the popular Automatic Lin

[digitalradio] Re: ALE400 Good

Agree, After several ARQ FAE qsos and some via unproto, the ALE400 mode does surprisingly well both on the lower and higher bands...well worth further investigation. 73, Bill N9DSJ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think Patrick may be on to