Hi Peter:
As I have already written, I feel that safety-critical
component as well as safety-related component are terms
that require more consideration than is necessary.
Basically, as I understand what you have said, a safety-
critical component is one where its failure creates a
Hi All
It is in CISPR 16-3 2000.
Also in Goedbloed's EMC textbook (don't have bibliog. info handy), and
Dvorak's 1981 IEEE EMC Symp paper.
Subj:Re: 80/80 rule for euro compliance?
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: 11/12/2001 5:29:24 PM Eastern Standard Time
From:
Dave,
As I recall, this used to be in CISPR16 ...Radio Interference Measuring
Apparatus and Methods, section 9.
In later versions of CISPR16, this requirement was mysteriously
deleted from CISPR16, and section 9 became Reserved for future use.
I have the old version of CISPR16 buried in my paper
We have a job opening for a qualified Product Safety Quality engineer.
The offial job description and applicant contact information are in the
attached document.
Thank you for your time.
Brodie Pedersen
SW QA Engineer
Nonin Medeical Inc.
Plymouth MN 55447 USA
jp qa engineer.doc
I assume that's 50 V/m. If you can do a CI type test on any attached cables
up to 400 MHz that would reduce the required illumination spot size down to
40 cm and any test house which is capable of generating the usual RI levels
will be able to achieve the higher level by moving the antenna
A monitor that is sold in Germany requires a RoV license number if the
accelerating voltage exceeds 20 kV and the CRT is not intrinsically safe. A
marking with the license number is required on the monitor and a copy of the
license must be supplied with the product.
If the product is private
Greetings all,
I remember hearing somewhere ( it seems that I found the answer
somewhere but I can't remember) that there is a stipulation for European
compliance that one should have 80% certainty that 80% of one's products
are compliant. I have no idea where this idea originally came from or
Donald
At the risk of pre-empting others with more time to give a comprehensive
answer, within Europe this type of product would fall under the General
Product Safety Directive 92/59/EEC
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/1992/en_392L0059.html
Currently this is rather vague on applicable
Hello Group,
Does anybody know of a test lab being able to test small objects (less than
15cm in any axis) up to 50V (with 80% AM 1KHz tone) from 80MHz to 1GHz
Best Regards,
Kevin Harris
Manager, Approval Services
Digital Security Controls
3301 Langstaff Road
Concord, Ontario
CANADA
L4K 4L2
You are almost there.
The FCC ID belongs to the original manufacture (or grantee) known as A
in this example. However, if someone wnats to privite label the product,
and sell under vendor B's name, he/she may simply replace the name, model,
etc. with their own words, but keep the FCC ID the
Chris, check out IEC 479-1 (Effects of current on human beings and livestock).
Real interesting reading - it mainly
analyzes human body impedances (measurements taken on living humans and
corpses) and discusses physiological effects
of AC in range of 15-100 Hz and DC. In their study, it
I read in !emc-pstc that Alex McNeil alex.mcn...@ingenicofortronic.com
wrote (in 5685ADDE2285D511925200508BB9F5031EBD9F@FORT2) about 'Radio
Module, full product re-test?', on Mon, 12 Nov 2001:
I have an alternate Small Radio Device (SRD) Module, previous one obsoleted,
in a product. This new
Group:
We are currently in the process of a new table top type product design which
will be powered via an external internationally certified DC supply.
I have been asked to determine what compliance standards will have to be
applied to ensure that the product meets regulator compliance
Greetings,
I have an old (circa 1986) LectroMagnetics shielded enclosure that I would
like to modify.
I'm looking for some parts and panels. It seems that LectroMagnetics (LMI
inc.) are no
longer around. Does anyone know if this product line (clamp together s.e.)
has been
taken over by
Hi Group,
Situation
I have an alternate Small Radio Device (SRD) Module, previous one obsoleted,
in a product. This new alternate Radio Module has ETS 300 683 (EMC) and EN
300 220-1 (Radio) approvals and DoC supplied by the manufacturer. The
product was already approved to these standards with
From my reading on the subject, EN 60950 has different Safety Extra-Low Voltage
(SELV) limits for alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) because the
human body reacts to them differently. AC makes your muscles contract, so you
tend to hang onto the source of the electric shock. DC
I read in !emc-pstc that Horst Haug innova...@t-online.de wrote (in
nebbjgdeklhmddlcffinceancoaa.innova...@t-online.de) about 'AW: Define
Continuous DC Voltage', on Sun, 11 Nov 2001:
Enclosed are results of a SELV reliability test. The output inductance was
shorted with no load and the
17 matches
Mail list logo
