On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:22:13 +0900 Mike McCormack
said:
probably is a good thing as its fewer mallocs in a loop. :)
> Hi All,
>
> Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in the mail loop, use a single
> linked in-place list.
>
> This avoid lots of mallocs and frees as the main loop iterates.
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 00:05:54 -0800
"Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
> Log:
> Adjust min sizes of ilist and textblock so that Modules dialog fits
> nicely into 240x320 (without these changes, the toolbar is partially
> obscured by illume indicator).
>
>
>
> Author: devilhorns
> Date:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:22:13 +0900
> Mike McCormack wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in the mail loop, use a single
>> linked in-place list.
>>
>> This avoid lots of mallocs and frees as the main loop ite
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in the mail loop, use a single
> linked in-place list.
>
> This avoid lots of mallocs and frees as the main loop iterates.
I like the idea, but I fear that doing change to the core main loop
stru
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:34 +0100, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> I like the idea, but I fear that doing change to the core main loop
> structure could break things. Maybe we should post pone this change to
> 1.1. From my point of view we already did to much change to ecore main
> loop during the beta cycle.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mike McCormack
> wrote:
>> Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in the mail loop, use a single
>> linked in-place list.
>>
>> This avoid lots of mallocs and frees as the main loop iterates.
>
> I lik
On 12/02/2010 08:20 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mike McCormack
>> wrote:
>>> Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in the mail loop, use a single
>>> linked in-place list.
>>>
>>> This avoid lots
2010/12/2 Mike McCormack :
> On 12/02/2010 08:20 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mike McCormack
>>> wrote:
Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in the mail loop, use a single
linked in-
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
wrote:
> 2010/12/2 Mike McCormack :
>> On 12/02/2010 08:20 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mike McCormack
wrote:
> Rather than using malloc'ed li
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike McCormack
wrote:
> Come on guys.
>
> The only reason that you're seeing this is that I don't commit directly to
> SVN.
No, I object because it's a huge change that might introduce bugs. The
fact is that this feature freeze is taking longer than most of us
des
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
2010/12/2 Mike McCormack :
On 12/02/2010 08:20 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Mike McCormack wrote:
Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in the mail lo
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike McCormack
> wrote:
>> Come on guys.
>>
>> The only reason that you're seeing this is that I don't commit directly to
>> SVN.
>
> No, I object because it's a huge change that might introduce bugs. The
> fact is th
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike McCormack
> wrote:
>> Come on guys.
>>
>> The only reason that you're seeing this is that I don't commit directly to
>> SVN.
>
> No, I object because it's a huge change that might introduce bugs. The
>
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:19 -0200, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike McCormack
> wrote:
> > Come on guys.
> >
> > The only reason that you're seeing this is that I don't commit directly to
> > SVN.
>
> No, I object because it's a huge change that might introduce bugs.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> I often experience crashes when using eve, when I reload it no saved
> informations (like favorites) or history are kept. Why not saving them
> when something changes?
Modifying eve_state.c is bad, since it is auto-generated: any c
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
> Here you are.
>
Applied, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Leandro
--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest inst
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote:
>
> I've also another version for this function, this one supports any
> protocol, following the syntax rules stated by the RFC 3986 considering
> everything that precedes a semicolon (:) as the schema, and the rest as
> the path (thi
2010/12/2 Tom Hacohen :
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:19 -0200, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike McCormack
>> wrote:
>> > Come on guys.
>> >
>> > The only reason that you're seeing this is that I don't commit directly to
>> > SVN.
>>
>> No, I object because it's a huge
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Dave Andreoli wrote:
> 2010/12/2 Tom Hacohen :
>> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:19 -0200, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike McCormack
>>> wrote:
>>> > Come on guys.
>>> >
>>> > The only reason that you're seeing this is that I don't commit
2010/11/30 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
> wrote:
>> 2010/11/30 Dave Andreoli :
>>> 2010/11/30 Enlightenment SVN :
Log:
Make edje_cc store script source snippets (only embryo now) in the
generated file.
Yeah... yeah..
2010/12/2 Dave Andreoli :
> 2010/11/30 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri :
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
>> wrote:
>>> 2010/11/30 Dave Andreoli :
2010/11/30 Enlightenment SVN :
> Log:
> Make edje_cc store script source snippets (only embryo now) in the
> genera
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 13:18:02 +0100
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
> wrote:
> > 2010/12/2 Mike McCormack :
> >> On 12/02/2010 08:20 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:22 AM
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:54:36 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Dave Andreoli wrote:
> > 2010/12/2 Tom Hacohen :
> >> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:19 -0200, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Mike McCormack
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Come on guys.
> >>
Dear all,
anybody can review and apply this to upstream?
Thank you.
Daniel Juyung Seo.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo
wrote:
> I attached a patch file again.
>
> Thanks.
> Daniel Juyung Seo.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Juyung Seo [mailto:seojuyu...@gmail.com
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:11:37 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo said:
i'll look at all of these little things... once i'm done digging thru all the
other... changes i have here... :) merge merge merge... tired of merging...
> Dear all,
>
> anybody can review and apply this to upstream?
>
> Thank you.
> Da
25 matches
Mail list logo
