ce as 'appearance' when matter is
acting like it is interacting with exotic matter that doesn't even
exist, may inherit nonlocality. Split a single brain apart and you
still have one entity having one set of qualia. At least that's what
I'm trying to work out.
My clumsy first pass at this is 2C Mary. I hope I get better at it!
cheers,
Colin
Hi
Been lurking a few weeks, feeling a little overwhelmed by how much more
everyone seems educated on the topic than I've managed to absorb through
my own casual readings. Internet geek, psychonaut from South Africa, no
formal education. :-)
(Apologies for length - so much I want to cover)
R Hlywk
Just a note. Think of a brain more than just an intake valve, reacting to
similar stuff, and not so similar stuff. There are so many things we need to
take into consideration. Genetics. We are born with a specific preprogramed
set of organization and hardware. the way the neurons are preorgani
At 23:35 03/06/03 +1000, Colin Hales wrote:
Dear Folks,
Once again I find myself fossicking at the boundaries and need to ask
one of those questions. My first experience with an asker of such a
question was in the last couple of years at high school. I'll tell
you about it because, well, the list
Colin Hales wrote:
The real question is the ontological status of the 'nothing' in that
last sentence. I am starting to believe that the true nature of the
'fundamental' beneath qualia is not only about the 'stuff', but is
actually about all of it. That is, the 'stuff' and the 'not stuff'.
So. Any
My physics is decades-old first-year U level (I'm a computer science type).
But if I'm not mistaken, there's no such thing as a 2C speed, or a 2C
closing
of separation between two objects. All speeds can only be measured
from some reference frame that is travelling with one of the objects
(say A
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 03:17 PM, Colin Hales wrote:
Re the latter thought:
Can I suggest reading a pile of Daniel Dennett? The
'representationalist' or its extremum: the "eliminativist" end of
consciousness is, as are all other philosophical positions as far as I
can tell, both right and wr
Hi,
> From: Mirai Shounen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think your idea makes sense.
> Just like the distance between two particles is not 'nothing'
> but a real
> property of the universe at that time (therefore there are 3 things
in
> mary's brain), also the specific configuration of
> neurotr
any kind of soul and
for a connection between soul and hardware. Any thoughts on this?
mirai++
- Original Message -
??? : "Colin Hales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
?? : "'everything'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
ing that is breathtakingly simple yet so
odd I am here to ask you folks to see what I see. To see where it
leads. I really don't know if it's well trodden ground or not.
The second part is 2C Mary. This is a small thought experiment
designed to illustrate as simply as I can the possib
10 matches
Mail list logo
