Re: [Flashcoders] test swf on slow machines

Hi dear, In VMWare player(blacberry playbook tablet) how to access sqlite data base... it can be access in simulator but not working in player.. whats d solution for this.. any one do me a favour.. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Paul Andrews wrote: > On 27/04/2011 08:40, Veda

Re: [Flashcoders] test swf on slow machines

On 27/04/2011 08:40, Vedanayagam G wrote: Hi In flex mobile project how to execute sql update and insert query for play book tablet cos in simulator its working but not update and insert query working in playbook tablet.. any body do me a favour for this my query You give so little i

Re: [Flashcoders] test swf on slow machines

Hi In flex mobile project how to execute sql update and insert query for play book tablet cos in simulator its working but not update and insert query working in playbook tablet.. any body do me a favour for this my query On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Paul Andrews wrote: > I would t

Re: [Flashcoders] test swf on slow machines

Hi In flex mobile project how to execute sql update and insert query for play book tablet cos in simulator its working but not update and insert query working in playbook tablet.. any body do me a favour for this my query On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Anthony Pace wrote: > How do you

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Now I have a chocolate highŠ :) on 4/24/11 12:18 PM, Kerry Thompson at al...@cyberiantiger.biz wrote: > Cor wrote: > > It is Easter, so hunting the bunny >> >> > Eggxactly. > ___ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > h

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Cor wrote: It is Easter, so hunting the bunny > > Eggxactly. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

RE: [Flashcoders] test

: [Flashcoders] test On 24/04/2011 14:48, Cor wrote: > Got it. Thanks Cor. I guess the list is exceptionally quiet. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcod

Re: [Flashcoders] test

On 24/04/2011 14:48, Cor wrote: Got it. Thanks Cor. I guess the list is exceptionally quiet. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

RE: [Flashcoders] test

Got it. -Original Message- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Paul Andrews Sent: zondag 24 april 2011 15:46 To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: [Flashcoders] test Traffic seems to have abruptly stoppe

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Micky Hulse wrote: > I have updated my code to use the above concept. > Is that what you mean? Sorry, here's the url: https://gist.github.com/933493 ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http:/

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Henrik Andersson wrote: > Nope. Timeline instances can, but doesn't have to, be Sprites too. And the > change is in fact useless for the purpose of detecting this scenario. Ah, interesting. Thanks for the clarification! I appreciate the help. :) Have a great day

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Micky Hulse wrote: > I assume that is how I would account for a timeline instance? Ah, I think I know what you mean now. I could do something like: public function Test($this:Object = null) { ... and use the passed-in value if one has been provided. I have upd

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

Hi Jason! Thanks so much for the constructive feedback, I really appreciate it. :) On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Merrill, Jason wrote: > This is one of those occasional questions where I would ask, even if you > could do this, why would it really be necessary from an architectural point > of

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

Micky Hulse skriver: After I posted my code, I changed this line: public class Test extends Sprite { ... to this: public class Test extends MovieClip { I assume that is how I would account for a timeline instance? Nope. Timeline instances can, but doesn't have to, be Sprites too. And the c

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

Hi Henrik, thanks so much for the reply/feedback, I really appreciate it. On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Henrik Andersson wrote: > The first one is if it was never added to any symbol. Ah, interesting. Good point. I am thinking that maybe I could check if typeof is object? This could also be

RE: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

>> Basically, I needed a way to test if my class was assigned to the FLA as a >> Document Class, >>or, if it was assigned to movieclip/sprite in library (export for >>actionscript) and added to stage manually. This is one of those occasional questions where I would ask, even if you could do th

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

Micky Hulse skriver: Basically, I needed a way to test if my class was assigned to the FLA as a Document Class, or, if it was assigned to movieclip/sprite in library (export for actionscript) and added to stage manually. You are missing two cases: The first one is if it was never added to any

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

Hi Erik, thanks so much for your help, I really appreciate it. :) On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Mattheis, Erik (MIN-WSW) wrote: > Put a function in your document class and check if the function is defined? Hmm, sorry, I might not have explained things too well. I have updated my code with co

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if class is attached to document or symbol?

Put a function in your document class and check if the function is defined? try { myDocumentClassFunction(); // must be your document class catch { // must not be your document class } On 4/20/11 7:31 PM, "Micky Hulse" wrote: Hi, I was just curious if there is a neat way to test i

Re: [Flashcoders] test swf on slow machines

I would think that very few people have such slow machines and while they are out there do they really form part of your target audience? What exactly are you doing to exercise the machines heavily? Last year I worked on a project that involved animating 150+ avatars on screen together (with d

Re: [Flashcoders] test

I just finished a 2 month revamp of a simulation game that's been out for 10 years. Really had to dust off the Director skills for that one. It was actually fun, because I still like some of the methodologies and approaches of Director. Maybe it was just nice to do something different for a couple

Re: [Flashcoders] test

I'm afraid that's not the case. Willem van den Goorbergh On 11 jan 2011, at 19:06, Merrill, Jason wrote: > Perhaps we're all gurus now. :)<\snip> > > Jason Merrill > Instructional Technology Architect > Bank of America Global Learning =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+= Geografiek is a Dutch,

Re: [Flashcoders] test

__ -Original Message- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Mendelsohn, Michael Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:37 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] test Good one Kerry! That's b

Re: [Flashcoders] test

:D I like the talking monkey concept ;) > ahahah. > > "ok i promised a client 3d dancing and talking monkeys integrated with > facebook and twitter, i've got a facebook account but i'm a bit stuck with > the rest" > > > On 12 January 2011 10:08, Glen Pike wrote: > >> No, Beno is still

Re: [Flashcoders] test

rning >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> -Original Message- >> From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto: >> flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Mendelsohn, >> Michael >> Sent

Re: [Flashcoders] test

ssage- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Mendelsohn, Michael Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:37 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] test Good one Kerry! That's because we don't have

Re: [Flashcoders] test

America Global Learning ___ -Original Message- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Mendelsohn, Michael Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:37 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: RE: [Flashcoders]

Re: [Flashcoders] test

> > And along the same lines, what's going on with feeds.adobe.com?  That's > > been down for weeks! > > They're aware of the situation and are working on it. Aaaand it's back! At least, that's what the Adobe folks told me. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://traini

Re: [Flashcoders] test

John R. Sweeney Jr wrote: > I didn't Direct-L was functioning anymore. > It's still there, for masochists and nostalgia buffs :-^| Cordially, Kerry Thompson ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/ma

Re: [Flashcoders] test

That could be a scary truth. :( on 1/11/11 12:06 PM, Merrill, Jason at jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote: > Or, could just be that the global economy still sucks and fewer of us have > jobs. John R. Sweeney Jr. Interactive Multimedia Developer OnDemand Interactive Inc 945 Washington Blvd

Re: [Flashcoders] test

I didn't Direct-L was functioning anymore. on 1/11/11 11:21 AM, Mendelsohn, Michael at michael.mendels...@fmglobal.com wrote: > OK, I'm convinced. It seems odd that the list has been *that* quiet. Until > this thread, I've gotten a grand total of 2 emails since the new year. That's > even qui

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Sorry I can't hear youŠ ;) on 1/11/11 10:59 AM, Anthony Pace at anthony.p...@utoronto.ca wrote: > ha!... that's funny ;^{o John R. Sweeney Jr. Interactive Multimedia Developer OnDemand Interactive Inc 945 Washington Blvd. Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 Office/Fax: 847.310.5959 Cellular: 847.651.

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Well you woke ME up. :) on 1/11/11 10:11 AM, Mendelsohn, Michael at michael.mendels...@fmglobal.com wrote: > Test: is the list alive? > > - MM John R. Sweeney Jr. Interactive Multimedia Developer OnDemand Interactive Inc 945 Washington Blvd. Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 Office/Fax: 847.310.595

RE: [Flashcoders] test

-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Mendelsohn, Michael Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:37 PM To: Flash Coders List Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] test Good one Kerry! > That's because we don't have "Flash is dead" threads. ___

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Well I just got back to work from 2 weeks of partying and actually getting some sleep; however, if you would prefer I help kick off the new year by asking some stupid questions, rather than Google the answers, I will gladly accommodate you. here ...it'll just be a sec... On 1/11/2011 12:25 PM

RE: [Flashcoders] test

Good one Kerry! > That's because we don't have "Flash is dead" threads. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Michael Mendelsohn wrote: Until this thread, I've gotten a grand total of 2 emails since the new year. > That's even quieter than Direct-L. > That's because we don't have "Flash is dead" threads. Cordially, Kerry Thompson ___ Flashcoders mailing list

Re: [Flashcoders] test

> And along the same lines, what's going on with feeds.adobe.com?  That's been > down for weeks! They're aware of the situation and are working on it. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOS

RE: [Flashcoders] test

And along the same lines, what's going on with feeds.adobe.com? That's been down for weeks! - MM ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

RE: [Flashcoders] test

OK, I'm convinced. It seems odd that the list has been *that* quiet. Until this thread, I've gotten a grand total of 2 emails since the new year. That's even quieter than Direct-L. - MM ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.co

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Mendelsohn, Michael skriver: Test: is the list alive? No, it died, the funeral is on feb 29. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Re: [Flashcoders] test

ha!... that's funny ;^{o On 1/11/2011 11:26 AM, Kerry Thompson wrote: Michael Mendelsohn wrote: Test: is the list alive? Nope. I didn't get this e-mail :-^| Cordially, Kerry Thompson ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com

Re: [Flashcoders] test

yes On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Mendelsohn, Michael < michael.mendels...@fmglobal.com> wrote: > Test: is the list alive? > > - MM > > > ___ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listin

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Indeed it is :-) Hello. Hello. Hello. Google Voice: (508) 656-0622 Twitter: eric_dolecki XBoxLive: edolecki PSN: eric_dolecki http://blog.ericd.net On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mendelsohn, Michael < michael.mendels...@fmglobal.com> wrote: > Test: is the list al

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Michael Mendelsohn wrote: > Test: is the list alive? > Nope. I didn't get this e-mail :-^| Cordially, Kerry Thompson ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Yes, but very quiet. On 11/01/2011 16:11, Mendelsohn, Michael wrote: Test: is the list alive? - MM ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Same thing happened to me about 2 weeks ago, with out any warning. :( on 8/27/10 11:47 AM, Keith Reinfeld at keithreinf...@comcast.net wrote: > Okay. Flashcoders disabled my account due to excessive bounces. I am just > trying to track down the cause. John R. Sweeney Jr. Interactive Multimedi

Re: [Flashcoders] test

We can't see you, so we're NOT sure. :) on 8/27/10 11:39 AM, Keith Reinfeld at keithreinf...@comcast.net wrote: > Am I bouncing? John R. Sweeney Jr. Interactive Multimedia Developer OnDemand Interactive Inc 945 Washington Blvd. Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 Office/Fax: 847.310.5959 Cellular: 847

RE: [Flashcoders] test

> boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Dave Watts > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 11:44 AM > To: Flash Coders List > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] test > > > Am I bouncing? > > I can't see whether you are or not. But your email isn't bouncing. > > Dave Watts

Re: [Flashcoders] test

> Am I bouncing? I can't see whether you are or not. But your email isn't bouncing. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authoriz

Re: [Flashcoders] Test

Elia Morlin wrote: > Are my messages coming through? Aside from wiseacre comments from the likes of Jason and me, there's an option you may not know about. Click on . Towards the bottom of the page, you will see a button labeled "Unsubsc

RE: [Flashcoders] Test

>> Are my messages coming through? No. Jason Merrill Instructional Technology Architect Bank of America Global Learning Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community and visit our Instructional Technology Design Blog (note: these are for Bank of America employees only)

Re: [Flashcoders] Test

Your previous messages have, but this one didn't. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Elia Morlin wrote: > Are my messages coming through? > > Thanks > ___ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailma

Re: [Flashcoders] Test

Yup --Original Message-- From: Elia Morlin Sender: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com To: Flash Coders List ReplyTo: Flash Coders List Subject: [Flashcoders] Test Sent: May 14, 2010 4:58 PM Are my messages coming through? Thanks ___ Flash

Re: [Flashcoders] test message

It works, I guess ... 2009/6/15 Dave Watts > testing ... > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > > Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized > instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, > Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia,

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Copy that! On 9/12/07, Surendar Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Testing Mail please just ignore > > Surendar Reddy.K Software Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ocimum > Biosolutions ...enabling R&D 6th Floor, Reliance Classic, Road No.1, > Banjara > Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, A.P, India Business P

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Testing Mail please just ignore Surendar Reddy.K Software Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ocimum Biosolutions ...enabling R&D 6th Floor, Reliance Classic, Road No.1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, A.P, India Business Phone: 55262700 | Mobile: 09849969760 | Fax: 556272505 BioIT Solutions | Microar

Re: [Flashcoders] Test list...

test On 9/6/07, Javier Tello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > ___ > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > To change your subscription options or search the archive: > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > Brought to you by Fig L

Re: [Flashcoders] Test

Ok looks like Flashcoders is having some troubles! haha I'm getting emails in random order from the past few days. ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/lis

Re: [Flashcoders] test (sorry)

Thanks for your understanding. Glad it's working. Steven Sacks Flash Maestro Los Angeles, CA -- blog: http://www.stevensacks.net gaia: http://www.gaiaflashframework.com Tony Trapp wrote: Hey Steven no biggie test away if need be. Tony... ___ Flas

Re: [Flashcoders] test (sorry)

Hey Steven no biggie test away if need be. Tony... - Original Message - From: "Steven Sacks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 1:01 AM Subject: [Flashcoders] test (sorry) Just testing this new email account for Flashcoders. ___

Re: [Flashcoders] Test

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Danny Kodicek > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 6:02 AM > To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Test > > > > Is this delivered??? > > 'ello > > D > > __

RE: [Flashcoders] Test

t; To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Test > > > > Is this delivered??? > > 'ello > > D > > ___ > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > To change your subscription options or searc

Re: [Flashcoders] Test

yes --Pedro Taranto Omar Fouad escreveu: Is this delivered??? ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Sof

RE: [Flashcoders] Test

Yup - but the list seems to be very slow today - My last posts took about 14hrs to come through -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar Fouad Sent: 22 March 2007 23:16 To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: [Flashcoders] Test Is this delivere

RE: [Flashcoders] Test

> Is this delivered??? 'ello D ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Co

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Test Again On 3/9/07, Dennis Landi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: test ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf

Re: [Flashcoders] TEST

Glen Pike schrieb: Now who wants to discuss which editor is the best? :) no, let's talk about OS's *gg micha ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listi

Re: [Flashcoders] test

x209 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Dave Watts > > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:11 AM > > To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] test

Re: [Flashcoders] test

PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Dave Watts > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:11 AM > To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] test > > Test again ... > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > > Fig Leaf Software provide

RE: [Flashcoders] test

Test yet again ... Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://trai

RE: [Flashcoders] test

ttyfig.figleaf.com > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] test > > Test again ... > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > > Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber > vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in > Washington DC, Atlanta,

RE: [Flashcoders] test

Test yet again ... Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.f

RE: [Flashcoders] test

Test again ... Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figle

RE: [Flashcoders] test

test Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ fo

RE: [Flashcoders] Test if using ActionScript 2.0

If you were using AS3.0 you could use the flash.display.LoaderInfo.actionScriptversion property. Wait--no, that only distinguishes 1.0 and 2.0 from 3.0. You could use the swfVersion property, though. Why exactly do you need to detect this? ― Mike Keesey > -Original Message- > From: [EMAI

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if using ActionScript 2.0

Furthermore, I think I read somewhere (can't remember where) that all code made in AS2.0 is converted to AS1.0 at compile time (classes and methods are converted to prototype-style functions), so even the flash player has no clue wether the code was 1.0 or 2.0. side-note: my first post on the lis

RE: [Flashcoders] Test if using ActionScript 2.0

My limited understanding is all .swfs compile down to bytecode anyway, and it's the Flash player that contains the runtime and inteprets the AS 1.0 or 2.0 bytecode as the case may be, not the .swf, so I don't think that would work. Jason Merrill Bank of America Learning & Organizational Effective

RE: [Flashcoders] Test CPU/performance/rendering

AFAIK the system.capabilities object is not capable of determining the highest FPS of the current viewer. Mostly it is for fairly vanilla info such as what FPlayer is running, OS, has Audio, has Video, etceteras. Which is not saying there is not a way to do so. If there is, peeps on this list wi

Re: [Flashcoders] Test CPU/performance/rendering

Some good points Robin. I'd like to try automate the process as much as I can but will keep that in mind - it may be a better solution. Your timer would work for CPU speed, but I think I'd have to combine it with some rendering of some kind to test the capabilities of the graphics card also. eg.

RE: [Flashcoders] Test CPU/performance/rendering

Hey Mick, Maybe it is better to give the user the option to select the processor speed rather than detecting it automatically. (that would be similar to picking your connection speed for a QuickTime movie). Some users may want to see all the effects even though they have a slow computer. If you w

RE: [Flashcoders] Test - ignore

| ICF International >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Watts >>Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 4:41 PM >>To: Flashcoders mailing list >>Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Test - ignor

RE: [Flashcoders] Test - ignore

> Yeah, I saw your reply, but not my post. In my list > subscription options on chattyfig.figleaf.com, I have > "Receive your own posts to the list?" set to be "Yes" but I > still don't see my own posts. Anyone know how to fix this? I suspect this may be a configuration issue with your mail s

RE: [Flashcoders] Test - ignore

>>Mine never show up unless someone replies...so, do you see it now? Yeah, I saw your reply, but not my post. In my list subscription options on chattyfig.figleaf.com, I have "Receive your own posts to the list?" set to be "Yes" but I still don't see my own posts. Anyone know how to fix this? J

Re: [Flashcoders] Test - ignore

Mine never show up unless someone replies...so, do you see it now? Cheers On 4/27/06, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Test - ignore > > my messages don't seem to be getting through. > > Jason Merrill | E-Learning Solutions | ICF International > > > > >

Re: [Flashcoders] test

D- Dave Watts wrote: test ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Con

RE: [Flashcoders] Test

> Out of curiosity Dave, do you know why the list(s) seems to > go down so often? Seems like every 2-3 months now. Not > complaining, just curious if you could fill us in. Thanks. The server is reaching its "end of life". I plan to purchase a new server by the end of Q2. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig

RE: [Flashcoders] Test

She's back up? Out of curiosity Dave, do you know why the list(s) seems to go down so often? Seems like every 2-3 months now. Not complaining, just curious if you could fill us in. Thanks. Jason Merrill | E-Learning Solutions | icfconsulting.com NOTICE: This message is for the

RE: [Flashcoders] test

> Is it online now? Yes. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://tra

RE: [Flashcoders] test

test -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Éric Thibault Sent: March 14, 2006 2:10 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] test Is it online now? Dave Watts wrote: >test > >Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Softw

Re: [Flashcoders] test

Is it online now? Dave Watts wrote: test Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if an library item exist (without JSFL)

oh, hehe, if you are not using components, use attachMovie() Peace, Mike On 1/27/06, M S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > What are you trying to do? > > var testLinkageName:String = "PimpDaddySmooth"; > var test = createObject(testLinkageName, "test", 420); > if (test == undefined) { >

Re: [Flashcoders] Test if an library item exist (without JSFL)

Hi, What are you trying to do? var testLinkageName:String = "PimpDaddySmooth"; var test = createObject(testLinkageName, "test", 420); if (test == undefined) { trace("linkage id is free in this library that is loaded"); } Peace, Mike On 1/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [Flashcoders] test

test recieved Weyert de Boer wrote: test ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders