n the formatting object tree.
Since different people have different speed-quality priorities, the
design allows choices for layout rules (once the choices are written,
however).
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technolog
f. If you are
interested in xmlroff, see the SourceForge sites.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center - Dublin
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
Hamilton House, East Point Business
then it becomes anarchy. It seems like user
I wasn't there when the spec was written, but it seems to me that
'currently-formatted page' presupposes making pages on the fly and
doesn't quite describe pages that are unbounded in one or both
directions (i.e. where there
that follows in the
area tree any other similarly constrained area that is attached
to an identically named fo:marker, using pre-order traversal
order.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center - Dubli
of FOP 2.0?
Regards,
Tony Graham
Tony Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3
of FOP 2.0?
Regards,
Tony Graham
Tony Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3
pt.
I just looked in the XSL Recommendation, and Section 7.8.1 notes:
XSL uses an abstract model of a font. This model is described in
this section and is based on current font technology as exemplified
by the OpenType specification [OpenType].
Maybe you also need to look at the OpenType
Arved Sandstrom wrote at 26 Sep 2002 19:50:01 -0300:
> Tony Graham says that should be a Unicode character, or Char. As
> in the actual real, encoded thing.
Empirical evidence suggests that is the general understanding:
grepping the XSL CR test suite shows everybody, FOP included,
Peter B. West wrote at 28 Sep 2002 00:39:34 +1000:
...
> Tony Graham wrote:
...
> > Section 5.11, Property Datatypes, trumps the individual property
> > definitions, since Section 5.11 defines "the syntax for specifying the
> > datatypes usable in property values&qu
er's code point, although the hexadecimal representation is
usually preferable.
In XSL terms, "'1'" is a one-character string literal, but while you
could claim that it is one character, there's no XSL conversion from a
string to a character, so shoul
Peter B. West wrote at 30 Sep 2002 13:28:18 +1000:
> Tony Graham wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 27 Sep 2002 16:44:32 -0300:
...
> > > That means "-", "#12235" , etc are characters, while "'1'" is not.
> >
&
.
The formatter is awaiting final approval before the code can be made public source.
An announcement will be made on xsl-list, www-xsl-fo, and XSL-FO@YahooGroups once the
code is available.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center
Sun Microsystems Ireland
le when he announced his
SourceForge project, so wind taking runs both ways. I would be
pleased if Arved and/or Eric would consider assisting with the
project. Frankly, I would be pleased if *anybody* assisted with the
project, but Arved and Eric would be a bonus.
Regards,
Tony Graham
-
words, it
> could be a failed internal project to create a commercial product.
No.
Regards,
Tony Graham
XML Technology Center - Dublin
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
Hami
14 matches
Mail list logo