On 01/04/2013 06:37, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> Are pkg dependent on FreeBSD Version?
>
> I've moved two 9.1 machines and I have one 8.2 that I would like to move
> to pkg.
>
> So can I move the 8.2 machine also?
Yes, you can.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PG
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:06:24 -0500
Joshua Isom wrote:
> On 3/31/2013 8:54 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > I have had only one problem with this description. I could not boot
> > from a GPT setup on my machine done as described there. But I have a
> > disk done with PCBSD based on 9.0 which bo
El día Monday, April 01, 2013 a las 03:13:07AM +0200, Sabine Baer escribió:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:20:05PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary
> > groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just work
Are pkg dependent on FreeBSD Version?
I've moved two 9.1 machines and I have one 8.2 that I would like to move
to pkg.
So can I move the 8.2 machine also?
Thanks
/Leslie
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_short_lifetime ?
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime ?
You might want to increase these, given the current state of things...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To uns
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> I'm probably not smart enough to be able to help directly with your problem
> but I'd like to add that there is a snowballing DNS Amplification ddos
> attack against SpamHaus going on which is spilling over
Yes, this is very much true. Th
I'll give you a more cogent reply tomorrow - if you use keep-state
rules, you want to be a little more specific - for tcp, you want
"allow tcp from X to Y setup keep-state" - i.e. you start the stateful
rule on packets that have the SYN flag set. There are some other
oddities here - I'm guessing t
Don O'Neil wrote:
> Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
> sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down
> to IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go
> away.
>
[snip]
I'm probably not smart enough to be ab
Thanks for the response... here's my full rullset:
# ipfw list
00100 check-state
00101 allow tcp from any to any established
00102 allow ip from any to any out keep-state
00103 allow icmp from any to any
00201 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00202 allow ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
00203 allow ip f
On 03/31/2013 08:58 AM, Andrei Brezan wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> It seems I'm experiencing some issues while trying to install packages
> that have dependencies that have other dependencies as well, or at least
> that's how I understand it.
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD host.example.com 9.1-RELEASE Fre
It would be really helpful if you'd post the ruleset.
At first glance, your stateful rules seem rather wrong, unless there's
a check-state above. Also, in and out aren't discriminating enough -
every packet is seen by the ruleset more than once. You should think
in terms of interfaces, direction
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down to
IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go away.
I have the basic rules like this for dns;
01160 allow udp from any t
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down to
IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go away.
I have the basic rules like this for dns;
01160 allow udp from any t
On 31 March 2013, at 18:28, Grant Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am in the midst of setting up the framework for new servers using FreeBSD
> 9.1. I used the bsdinstall and Manual`` option when setting up the disk
> geometry using GPT - graphical setup.
>
>
>
> The idea will be to eventual
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:12:06PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
[...]
> Back then you had to have brains to be on the net, now everyone is
> web 2.0, and they're satisfied with ridiculous web forums. Any
> brains today are all but forced to use them because the population
> is so slim anywhere else. Us
On 3/31/2013 8:28 PM, Grant Peel wrote:
I was wondering in anyone sees any issues creating the drive geometry using
this method, with the intent of restoring dumped filesystems to to,
including the root filesystem.
Geometry or partition size? If it's geometry, and you need to worry
about it,
On 3/31/2013 8:54 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
I have had only one problem with this description. I could not boot
from a GPT setup on my machine done as described there. But I have a
disk done with PCBSD based on 9.0 which booted well. I cannot tell you
if this is a problem caused by a later chanc
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:28:40 -0400
"Grant Peel" wrote:
> I am in the midst of setting up the framework for new servers using
> FreeBSD 9.1. I used the bsdinstall and Manual`` option when setting
> up the disk geometry using GPT - graphical setup.
>
> The idea will be to eventually dump the
Hi all,
I am in the midst of setting up the framework for new servers using FreeBSD
9.1. I used the bsdinstall and Manual`` option when setting up the disk
geometry using GPT - graphical setup.
The idea will be to eventually dump the 4 file systems, (/, /usr /var and
/home) and restore them
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:20:05PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
[...]
> I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary
> groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works.
The remaining users of de.* often say they filter postings injected
over this server
Greetings...
I checked at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi and found
no open bug-reports; and nothing on -questions for March. Maybe it's
confined to my system, or I missed an UPDATING notice; if not, I'll go
to the maintainer and/or file a bug report. Before I do that are there
any
On Sunday, March 31, 2013 19:24:49 Michael Powell wrote:
> Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:32 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> >> I installed smartmontools, "start_smartd=yes" I have in rc.conf
> >
> > Without further investigation - shouldn't that be
> >
> > smartd_enable="YES"
> >
> > con
On Monday, April 01, 2013 00:39:53 Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:32 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > I installed smartmontools, "start_smartd=yes" I have in rc.conf
>
> Without further investigation - shouldn't that be
>
> smartd_enable="YES"
>
> conforming to the syntax of other se
Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:32 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
>> I installed smartmontools, "start_smartd=yes" I have in rc.conf
>
> Without further investigation - shouldn't that be
>
> smartd_enable="YES"
>
> conforming to the syntax of other service start commands?
> At least that mig
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:32 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> I installed smartmontools, "start_smartd=yes" I have in rc.conf
Without further investigation - shouldn't that be
smartd_enable="YES"
conforming to the syntax of other service start commands?
At least that might be the reason why smartd
Hi!
I installed smartmontools, "start_smartd=yes" I have in rc.conf and I edited
/usr/local/etc/smart.conf where I have:
/dev/ada0 -a -d auto -o on -S on -s (S/../.././02|L/../../6/03) -m root
When I use top there are no smartd and if I run smartd again than top shows me
smartd for few seconds a
On 03/31/13 16:07, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
On 03/31/2013 08:58 AM, Andrei Brezan wrote:
Hello list,
It seems I'm experiencing some issues while trying to install packages
that have dependencies that have other dependencies as well, or at least
that's how I understand it.
# uname -a
FreeBSD h
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:43:27 +0200, Michael Ross wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:31:43 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
> >> Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
> >> a copyright on software?
> >
> > With _which_ gove
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:31:43 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
a copyright on software?
With _which_ government? :-)
Basic understanding of copyright is: The stuff _you_ write
happe
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
> Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
> a copyright on software?
With _which_ government? :-)
Basic understanding of copyright is: The stuff _you_ write
happens "automatically" under _your_ copyright, because you
On Mar 31, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Joe wrote:
> kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
>>> If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
>>> should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
>>> it un
On 31-3-2013 15:30, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Sunday, March 31, 2013 a las 01:35:43PM +0200, Koop Mast escribió:
gnome-icon-theme >= 3.0.0) were not met:
No package 'gtk+-3.0' found
Requested 'gnome-icon-theme >= 3.0.0' but version of gnome-icon-theme is 2.30.3
So, we FreeBSD folks, have n
Hello list,
It seems I'm experiencing some issues while trying to install packages
that have dependencies that have other dependencies as well, or at least
that's how I understand it.
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.example.com 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue
Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 201
kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
it under it's own license?
For example: I would like to rewri
El día Sunday, March 31, 2013 a las 01:35:43PM +0200, Koop Mast escribió:
> > gnome-icon-theme >= 3.0.0) were not met:
> >
> > No package 'gtk+-3.0' found
> > Requested 'gnome-icon-theme >= 3.0.0' but version of gnome-icon-theme is
> > 2.30.3
> >
> > So, we FreeBSD folks, have no chance to build
On 31-3-2013 12:02, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, March 07, 2013 a las 07:01:12AM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió:
El día Wednesday, March 06, 2013 a las 04:00:36PM -0500, Derrick Dantavious
Edwards escribió:
Hi,
I continue to get this error when I attempt to compile ekiga3.
El día Thursday, March 07, 2013 a las 07:01:12AM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió:
> El día Wednesday, March 06, 2013 a las 04:00:36PM -0500, Derrick Dantavious
> Edwards escribió:
>
> > Hi,
> > I continue to get this error when I attempt to compile ekiga3. Any ideas?
> >
> > FreeBSD 10.0-CUR
Andrei Brezan wrote:
[snip]
> Also what i've noticed is that 'p' as a suffix is for percona.
Oops! And I was thinking Percona but for some reason PostgreSQL came out my
fingers! DOH!
-Mike
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
38 matches
Mail list logo