RE: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-13 Thread JJB
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren Block Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:39 PM To: Robert Storey Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: the most light weight X web browser? On Tue, 11 May 2004, Robert Storey wrote: > I followed your advice about compiling Links so that it could run in graph

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-11 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Robert Storey wrote: > I followed your advice about compiling Links so that it could run in graphics > mode without X. > > This is REALLY COOL - one of the best tips I've received in a long time, and I > thank you for it. However, I've run into one little glitch. As root, it w

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-11 Thread Robert Storey
Dear Warren, I followed your advice about compiling Links so that it could run in graphics mode without X. This is REALLY COOL - one of the best tips I've received in a long time, and I thank you for it. However, I've run into one little glitch. As root, it works fine, but as a regular user, when

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-10 Thread David Fleck
On Sun, 9 May 2004, John Mills wrote: > Reading the 'links' project pages puts graphic rendering at links version > >=2.0, I believe. Thanks, I eventually figured out that /usr/ports/links = v2.1, while /usr/ports/links1 = v0.98. -- David Fleck [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-09 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Warren Block wrote: > Make sure you have svgalib installed (/usr/ports/devel/svgalib). Err... that would be /usr/ports/graphics/svgalib. Sorry. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://

RE: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-09 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 9 May 2004, mark rowlands wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] : /web1/web1: 03:16 PM: > links -version > Links 2.1pre14 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] : /web1/web1: 03:17 PM: > links -help > links [options] URL > Options are: > > -g > Run in graphics mode. But the next few lines of the man page say that o

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-09 Thread John Mills
Freebies - On Sun, 9 May 2004, David Fleck wrote: > 'links -g', eh? > dcf>$ links -g > Unknown option -g Reading the 'links' project pages puts graphic rendering at links version >=2.0, I believe. I couldn't find an appropriate RPM for my 2.4.x Linuxes but had no problem building and insta

RE: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-09 Thread mark rowlands
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Fleck > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 2:49 PM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: the most light weight X web browser? > > 'links -g', eh? > > dcf>

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-09 Thread David Fleck
'links -g', eh? dcf>$ links -g Unknown option -g Some *other* links, perhaps? -- David Fleck [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2004-05-08T09:21:36Z, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But such a slow notebook what browser do you suggest to use? The > harddisk don't have much space after the OS is installed, and memory > is pretty limited. Does the browser *have* to run on the laptop itself, or could you configu

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Roop Nanuwa
On Sat, 8 May 2004 16:35:55 -0400, Christopher Nehren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... right. Opera is a kitchen sink suite just like Mozilla. > That, and it's the ugliest thing on the planet -- even worse than > anything Apple's ever released, IMO. > It is feature-packed, that's true. However

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Robert Storey
Is there any way to get "links -g" to run without starting X? If I run it in an Xterm, it's fine, but at the console it just exits with an error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> links -g Could not initialize any graphics driver. Tried the following drivers: x: Can't open display "(null)" Would be n

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Viktor Lazlo
On Sat, 8 May 2004, Zhang Weiwu wrote: > Hello. My friend is running a tea house, she want to put her ancient > Pentium 100 notebook (24MB memory) running FreeBSD 4.9, on the bar so > customers can use it check mails and browse the web. (and I want to help > her.) She want it to just function as a

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Christopher Nehren
On Sat, 8 May 2004 02:28:32 -0700, Roop Nanuwa scribbled these curious markings: >Take a look at Opera. It is extremely lightweight in both size, memory >footprint and CPU usage. It also has a built-in kiosk mode which would >probably be perfectly suited for use in the tea house. ... right. Opera

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Mark Weinem
On Sat, 08 May 2004, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Dillo! You really want to have a look at dillo. Increadibly fast and > small, but with limitations (no SSL and such) all true, but unfortunately it's crashing with bookmarking (the ports version). Ciao, Mark Weinem __

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Am Samstag, 8. Mai 2004 11:21 schrieb Zhang Weiwu: > Hello. My friend is running a tea house, she want to put her ancient > Pentium 100 notebook (24MB memory) running FreeBSD 4.9, on the bar so > customers can use it check mails and browse the web. (and I want to help > her.) She want it to just fu

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread albi
On Sat, 8 May 2004 11:57:47 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But such a slow notebook what browser do you suggest to use? The > > harddisk don't have much space after the OS is installed, and memory > > is pretty limited. Epiphany comes to my mind, but it depends on > > Mozilla and gtk. If ther

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread jan . muenther
Hey there, > But such a slow notebook what browser do you suggest to use? The > harddisk don't have much space after the OS is installed, and memory is > pretty limited. Epiphany comes to my mind, but it depends on Mozilla and > gtk. If there is an extremely light weighted browser that just us

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Parv
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Zhang Weiwu thusly... > > she want to put her ancient Pentium 100 notebook (24MB memory) > running FreeBSD 4.9, ... She want it to just function as a browser > machine, she don't even need a window manager Ion, treewm, or tvtwm should be enough for a window ma

Re: the most light weight X web browser?

2004-05-08 Thread Roop Nanuwa
On Sat, 08 May 2004 17:21:36 +0800, Zhang Weiwu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. My friend is running a tea house, she want to put her ancient > Pentium 100 notebook (24MB memory) running FreeBSD 4.9, on the bar so > customers can use it check mails and browse the web. (and I want to help > h