Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
>
> # mptutil show adapter
> mpt0 Adapter:
>Board Name: UNUSED
>Board Assembly:
> Chip Name: C1068E
> Chip Revision: UNUSED
> RAID Levels: none
> #
>
> The problem is, I can
Yeah!!! 96.47.72.120 works! Thanks!
> Depends. Where are your other installed packages from? I'd probably
> re-install all of them from the pkg-test repository just to be safe.
I installed 9.1 on new node and compiled from ports.
It took a long time, which I want to avoid right now.
Here is what
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 10:58, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > Use PACKAGESITE=http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest
> >
> > That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository;
> > it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why
> > it's calling itself '
> Use PACKAGESITE=http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest
>
> That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository;
> it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why
> it's calling itself 'pkg-test'
>
> Oh -- there isn't an A record in the DNS for
Colleagues,
I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
# mptutil show adapter
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: UNUSED
Board Assembly:
Chip Name: C1068E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: none
#
The problem is, I cannot configure any RAIDs (please see
On 02/10/2013 21:07, Winston wrote:
> Summary:
>
> Where is the (U.S.) pkg(ng) repository for amd64 9.2-RELEASE (i.e.,
> what's the right URI for PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf)?
>
>
> Things I tried that didn't work:
>
> * pkg_add -r pkg didn't create /usr
Summary:
Where is the (U.S.) pkg(ng) repository for amd64 9.2-RELEASE (i.e.,
what's the right URI for PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf)?
Things I tried that didn't work:
* pkg_add -r pkg didn't create /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
* pkg.conf.sample suggests "http://pkg.freebsd.org/${
. Then just portsnap fetch &&
portsnap extract. You will get a fresh ports tree.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Christian Campbell
wrote:
> Hi. I run 9.1-RELEASE on two boxes: one i386 and the other amd64. I've run
> the latter for a bit over a week. When I portsnap update, t
Hi. I run 9.1-RELEASE on two boxes: one i386 and the other amd64. I've run
the latter for a bit over a week. When I portsnap update, the 32-bit
machine typically gets several to dozens or hundreds of updates, while the
64-bit machine typically gets none, or maybe a couple. What might b
On 09/13/2013 02:46 PM, Eir Nym wrote:
> I get this error for a while, and don't know what to do with.
>
> I build the world, then try to install it into DESTDIR. And at this point I
> always get error that libc.a can't be found.
>
> To eliminate any mistakes in commits I've run snapshot r255342
I get this error for a while, and don't know what to do with.
I build the world, then try to install it into DESTDIR. And at this point I
always get error that libc.a can't be found.
To eliminate any mistakes in commits I've run snapshot r255342 from FTP in
VM and build sources it contains.
my b
Hi--
On May 30, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Michael Gass wrote:
> I am currently using a 9.1-RELEASE with an i386 install.
> The hardware is a core 2 duo with 2 GB of RAM. My video card
> is an ati radeon hd 2400 xt. Things work fine.
>
> Would I gain anything by starting over and
> Would I gain anything by starting over and doing an AMD64 install
> or would that be a bad idea? Would my system perform better, worse,
> or the same after the change? I may eventually bring the memory up
> to 4GB, but not anytime soon.
>
> I understand some ports my not work - li
I am currently using a 9.1-RELEASE with an i386 install.
The hardware is a core 2 duo with 2 GB of RAM. My video card
is an ati radeon hd 2400 xt. Things work fine.
Would I gain anything by starting over and doing an AMD64 install
or would that be a bad idea? Would my system perform better
I am currently using a 9.1-RELEASE with an i386 install.
The hardware is a core 2 duo with 2 GB of RAM. My video card
is an ati radeon hd 2400 xt. Things work fine.
Would I gain anything by starting over and doing an AMD64 install
or would that be a bad idea? Would my system perform better
Hello list,
Portaudit said thunderbird had a vulnerability so I went to upgrade it
with portupgrade but it coredumps and it does this a good while into the
compilation process. Can anyone advise please how to overcome this?
Here is my system and output:
system - FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p3 #0 r250634
Dears All ,
The following message
"hwpstate0 : set freq failed , err 6"
is displayed frequently on the following computer :
Main board : ASUS M5A97 R2.0
Processor : AMD FX X8 8350
Graphics Card : PowerColor HD 4830
Memory : 32GB
FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 2013-04-20 Snapshot
What
I'm migrating a lot of services to a new server running 9.1 amd64.
I have a VMWare FreeBSD 3.3 server I want to decommission, which is
running a client's website with a shopping cart system in an a.out
binary (source code lost long ago).
I have just tried to build a new kernel
At 09:07 AM 1/23/2013, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:52:17, Derek Ragona wrote:
DR> I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro
X9SCM-F/X9CL-F
DR> motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right.
DR>
DR> These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is fo
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:52:17, Derek Ragona wrote:
DR> I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F
DR> motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right.
DR>
DR> These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is for a dedicated IPMI interface.
DR>
DR> I have bot
I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F
motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right.
These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is for a dedicated IPMI interface.
I have both servers configured to use the dedicated IPMI NIC and these
NIC's are p
On 10-01-2013 05:56, ＊;sτóΡ〆~*~ξ wrote:
>��请�导
>
>���骤�
>
># portsnap fetch update
># cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose
># make install clean
>
>�路��认���OK�
>�
>
>pass -build programs
>pass -Libraries
>pass -DLLs
>pass -Programs
>Pass - i
���请�导
��骤��
# portsnap fetch update
# cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose
# make install clean
��路���认�OK��
���
pass -build programs
pass -Libraries
pass -DLLs
pass -Programs
Pass - install
kmk:*** NoRULE to make target '/usr/src/sys/kern/b
t; #
>
> which doesn't seem to work:
>
> root: /etc/rc: WARNING: failed to start powerd
>
> Is the following dmesg line relevant?
>
> # dmesg|grep "power management"
> jbusppm0: mem
> 0x4000f00-0x4000f07,0x4000f410050-0x4000f41005f on nexus0
> #
rd
Is the following dmesg line relevant?
# dmesg|grep "power management"
jbusppm0: mem
0x4000f00-0x4000f07,0x4000f410050-0x4000f41005f on nexus0
#
Anyway, I wonder if powerd is only for amd64/i386
and is not supposed to work on sparc64.
cpufreq(4) is not listed in sparc64 GENER
Hi,
I've done the upgrade yesterday. It was a clean 8.3 install, I only set
up PPPoE and then run the following commands.
# cd /usr/ports/misc/mc && make install clean
# uname -r
8.3-RELEASE
# freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade
# freebsd-update install
# shutdown -r now
# freebsd-update insta
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 07:35 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 10:57 -0500, Paul Kraus wrote:
> > On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:29 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > >> I'd say: Use the source Luke. :-)
> > >
> > > :)
> > >
> > > S
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 10:57 -0500, Paul Kraus wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:29 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> >> I'd say: Use the source Luke. :-)
> >
> > :)
> >
> > Strange question: Is the FreeBSD handbook available as iBook?
>
>
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 15:52 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > The author of the snd_hdspe driver for FreeBSD seems to need testers.
>
> I never have heard of this driver.
It's a new driver for FreeBSD for some cards of the vendor RME, AFAIK
they only sell really professional audio cards, used for
On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:29 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
>> I'd say: Use the source Luke. :-)
>
> :)
>
> Strange question: Is the FreeBSD handbook available as iBook?
You can get it as a PDF at
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/en_US.
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:29 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> I'd say: Use the source Luke. :-)
:)
Strange question: Is the FreeBSD handbook available as iBook?
At the moment I've got plenty of time, unfortunately not in front of my
desktop computer. Some time ago I won an iPad2, it's a dust catcher,
n
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:13:39 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> ok, so "FreeBSD release" is the version of the kernel and not a
> labelling for the collection of all the software.
yes. It is even so that the ports work on all 'current' FreeBSD
versions but not the packages. With other words, you w
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:13:39 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Thank you Erich :)
>
> ok, so "FreeBSD release" is the version of the kernel and not a
> labelling for the collection of all the software.
No. The version specification refers to the version of the
kernel _and_ the operating system (which
Thank you Erich :)
ok, so "FreeBSD release" is the version of the kernel and not a
labelling for the collection of all the software.
For Linux major distros there usually is a labelling for the collection
of the software, independent of the kernel version.
On Linux I usually install binaries for
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:09:16 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:14 -0600, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > You may also use at your discretion the portmaster tool? It works
> > very well and a nice example is given by W. Block:
> >
> > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/
Ralf,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:14 -0600, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>> You may also use at your discretion the portmaster tool? It works
>> very well and a nice example is given by W. Block:
>>
>> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/portu
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:14 -0600, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> You may also use at your discretion the portmaster tool? It works
> very well and a nice example is given by W. Block:
>
> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/portupgrade.html
Thank you Antonio :)
because I can't install FreeBSD
Ralf,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> this isn't a request, just a note about the handbook, from the point of
> view a newbie has got.
>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
>
> "We also assume that you have already obtained
Hi :)
this isn't a request, just a note about the handbook, from the point of
view a newbie has got.
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
"We also assume that you have already obtained the sources to a newer
system. If the sources available on the particular
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:54:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:42 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
> ^^^8.3
> > including the driver or something similar to get the
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:57 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:42:41 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
> > including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
> > Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:42:41 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
> including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
> Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3 until now :D, but if
> IIUC I need >= 9.0.
It would probably
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:42 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
^^^8.3
> including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
> Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3 until
Hi :)
first I tried to install FreeBSD 9.0 64bit by the default installer, but
it didn't work, then I installed PC-BSD 8.2 and it worked, after that I
tried 9.0 again, but I choose sysinstall, it also failed.
Now I've got FreeBSD 8.3 64bit installed, installing it worked without
issues. I later t
Erich couldn't answer as I recently made the
switch to amd64 myself.
x11-wm/xfce4
yes.
www/firefox
Yes.
www/linux-f10-flashplugin11
Yes
editors/libreoffice
Yes.
www/tomcat-7
www/apace22
Typo? Apache 2.2 runs.
devel/aegis (I am the maintainer)
devel/fhist
devel/cook
java/open
wer, I do not have installed.
>
> I have avoided amd64 in the past due to some or not all them working,
> but want to switch if possible because PAE seems to be broken now on
> i386.
It was a big jump forward when I switched during 8.0 or 8.1.
>
> So I have the following question
-ose (and additions)
print/cups
I have avoided amd64 in the past due to some or not all them working,
but want to switch if possible because PAE seems to be broken now on
i386.
So I have the following questions:
1. Will all the above ports (and their dependencies) work on amd64?
2. Is there any way
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:00:51 -0500
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
> switching to amd64 ... nvidia-kmod are the minimal ones I need]) the
> main reason for asking is PAE seems to be broken now
The last I heard the nvidia driv
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:13:36 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 12/16/12 07:08, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > And if you're using Firefox, there are plugins available that
> > allow you to download video content instead of dealing with the
> > "Flash" player the site wants you to use.
>
> and the recommen
On 12/16/12 04:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
> switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
> on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
> apache22, flash, cups, devel/
On 12/16/12 11:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:48:40 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Specific requirements _could_ be wine and nVidia's proprietary GPU
> driver, as far as I know." - Polytropon (Btw. thank you Polytropon :)
I'm using amd64 on an Atom/ION box here, the Nvidia binary drive
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 05:35 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I'm running amd64 and it seems rock-solid and well supported.
I had a similar question. I wanted to know if there are issues for
audio, when using 64 bit and got this reply:
"If
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:05:47 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 18:45 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > flash
>
> For Linux there are no issues with the proprietary 64 bit flash, but
> there will be no new versions of Flash any more for Linux. If FreeBSD
> should use the Linux vers
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 18:45 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> flash
For Linux there are no issues with the proprietary 64 bit flash, but
there will be no new versions of Flash any more for Linux. If FreeBSD
should use the Linux version, than Flash in the near future either way
won't work any more. I
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 05:35 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> I'm running amd64 and it seems rock-solid and well supported.
I had a similar question. I wanted to know if there are issues for
audio, when using 64 bit and got this reply:
"If you do not have a _specific_ requireme
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:00:51 -0500
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
> switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
> on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
> apache22,
On 12/16/12 05:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook, devel/fhist,
virtualbox-ose, nvidia-kmod are
4GB.
However, since apps runs unmodified, a single process cannot break that
barrier.
So, if you are running a single program that requires that lot of
memory, PAE is not an option and you will need amd64.
OTOH, if you run several programs which don't singularly require more
than 3GB of
> How does the system know what is OS and what is 32-bit apps?
>
"OS" works in kernel space while application is not.
PAE affects paging system allowing software to address 2^36 bytes of memory.
You can access it in kernel space, but user space applications are limited
to 2^32 bytes of virtual mem
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Bill Tillman wrote:
> > i386 will not see anything above 4 GB
> Actually you *can* give access to >4Gb RAM for your system: PAE allows you
> to use 36 bits instead of 32 to address your memory (and supported till
> Pentium Pro) but that is only for OS (32bit a
Even that I was aware of that, I've just lost track of it. Thanks for simple
solution.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765489.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabbl
The problem is, it gets recreated upon updating from source.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765488.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd
On 29/11/2012 22:00, Jakub Lach wrote:
If it was from me, my system is without 32bit compat
whatsoever, and this is not default setting on amd64.
Maybe on def. amd64 there are no problems, I don't
know, nobody replied to my thread.
I have been running 9.0 amd64 for nearly 12 months, I
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Bill Tillman wrote:
> i386 will not see anything above 4 GB
Actually you *can* give access to >4Gb RAM for your system: PAE allows you
to use 36 bits instead of 32 to address your memory (and supported till
Pentium Pro) but that is only for OS (32bit app
If it was from me, my system is without 32bit compat
whatsoever, and this is not default setting on amd64.
Maybe on def. amd64 there are no problems, I don't
know, nobody replied to my thread.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-
From: Fleuriot Damien
To: birdf...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: i386 vs amd64
On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:36 PM, mike miskulin wrote:
> About to build a replacement system for an ol
> The only problem might be if you want to use wine. As it has
> been said, there are binary packages (wine_amd64, if I remember
> correctly), but the rest of the system should run good on
> amd64 as it did on i386.
>
> Sidenote: I switched back from 8.2/amd64 to 8.2/i386 becaus
On 11/28/12 18:49, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, mike miskulin wrote:
About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
binary packages (wine_amd64, if I remember
correctly), but the rest of the system should run good on
amd64 as it did on i386.
Sidenote: I switched back from 8.2/amd64 to 8.2/i386 because
of three reasons (in fact, two reasons and one justification):
I had problems with wine, problems with nVidia&#x
> What port was that ?
>
> I've never had a *single* problem due to using amd64 over i386.
Well I have to apologize, I've reached senility! My past bad experience
was with netbsd amd64 afterwhich I bailed and went to FreeBSD i386
(thanks google).
But I guess the basic que
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, mike miskulin wrote:
About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
large annoyance too.
Now I have a new
On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:36 PM, mike miskulin wrote:
> About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
> years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
> as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
> large a
About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
large annoyance too.
Now I have a new system with 8GB, etc,etc and wonder if I am best
.c:(.text+0xdb8):
> undefined reference to `agp_fi
> nd_device'
> /home/svn/9.1/src/sys/dev/drm/drm_agpsupport.c:(.text+0xe2f):
> undefined reference to `agp_ge
> t_info'
> *** [kernel] Error code 1
> ...
>
&g
pci0:2:4:0:class=0x060700 card=0x30c2103c
chip=0x04761180 rev=0xb6 hdr=0x02
>> vendor = 'Ricoh Co Ltd'
>> device = 'RL5c476 II'
>> class = bridge
>> subclass = PCI-CardBus
&g
From ill...@gmail.com Sat Nov 24 16:09:29 2012
On 22 November 2012 06:19, Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
> It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
> whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
> The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
On 24 November 2012 10:14, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 22 November 2012 06:19, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
>> whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
>> The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
>> show dmesg?
>>
>> Please advise
On 22 November 2012 06:19, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
> whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
> The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
> show dmesg?
>
> Please advise
>
> Thanks
> Anton
>
>
> hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x060
It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
show dmesg?
Please advise
Thanks
Anton
hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x30c2103c chip=0x79101002 rev=0x00
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'A
What's state of valgrind port on pure amd64 system?
Here, it core dumps upon linking both with clang and gcc47,
with complaint that looks suspicious (expected i386 not X86_64
or something to that effect).
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/valgrind-on
On 10/27/12 07:50, Gary Aitken wrote:
> running 9.0 release
>
> Being frustrated with my radeon hd-5550 video card which occasionally
> (once a week or so) goes into some kind of reset loop, filling up
> Xorg.0.log and crashing the system because /var is full...
>
> I picked up an asus nvidia gt
running 9.0 release
Being frustrated with my radeon hd-5550 video card which occasionally
(once a week or so) goes into some kind of reset loop, filling up
Xorg.0.log and crashing the system because /var is full...
I picked up an asus nvidia gt 610.
Downloaded the nvidia driver and tried to build
running 9.0 release
Being frustrated with my radeon hd-5550 video card which occasionally
(once a week or so) goes into some kind of reset loop, filling up
Xorg.0.log and crashing the system because /var is full...
I picked up an asus nvidia gt 610.
Downloaded the nvidia driver and tried to build
On 21/10/2012 07:35, Darrel wrote:
> Advice? I have not seen this before:
>
> (685) @ 2:22:16> cd /usr/src
> (686) @ 2:22:18> svn up
> Updating '.':
> Skipped 'sys' -- Node remains in conflict
> At revision 241794.
> Summary of conflicts:
> Skipped paths: 1
> (687) @ 2:22:43>
For some reason s
(osreldate)
Hardware Platform: amd64
Processor Architecture: amd64
ZFS Storage pool Version: 28
ZFS Filesystem Version: 5
FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 #0 r241106: Mon Oct 1 18:26:44 UTC 2012 root
2:32AM up 4 days,
Kevin,
Thank you for your response. It is great to get confirmation and I
will try with 9.1-RC1
I DO have on board Broadcom 5720 NIC. Nice to know what my next
problem is likely to be. Hopefully that will be easy to solve if I
install another NIC card.
Thanks!
Jean
Jean Christoffe
I am trying to install FreeBSD stable - either 8.3 or 9.0 - on a Dell
420 with Perc H310 LSI PCI Express SAS Rain controllers.
Although the physical disks are present and recognized by the BIOS the
sysinstall does not see the disks. I think the issue is mfi driver
and was added to the sta
== John Levine wrote on Mon 13.Aug'12 at 5:41:52 - ==
> Oops, it's 14.0.1 I'm trying to build. 13.0.0.1 is what I have installed now.
>
> In article <20120813053621.24629.qm...@joyce.lan> you write:
did you select the option to use optimised CFLAGS when you run make
config in the port dire
Oops, it's 14.0.1 I'm trying to build. 13.0.0.1 is what I have installed now.
In article <20120813053621.24629.qm...@joyce.lan> you write:
>I'm reasonably sure I have the png and sqlite3 libraries built as
>needed, but the build still barfs when compiling the SSL function
>nsNSSErrors.cpp. The e
I'm reasonably sure I have the png and sqlite3 libraries built as
needed, but the build still barfs when compiling the SSL function
nsNSSErrors.cpp. The end of the build log is copied below.
I don't have the logs handy, but Thunderbird fails the same way. Any
suggestions?
R's,
John
c++ -o nsN
Hi Darren,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 04:57:43 +0400
Darren Baginski wrote:
> No, feel free to open if you feel it needed.
> I would say it's more a feature request, but without it, bsdinstall not
> usable on non release environments.
thanks, I submitted the PR here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-
29.07.2012, 00:29, "Matthias Petermann" :
> Hi Darren,
>
> thanks for diving into the issue. I looked through the mentioned places in
> the bsdinstall code and understand it now.
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:24:48 +0400
> Darren Baginski wrote:
>
>> I thing release/arch selection has to be a par
Hi Darren,
thanks for diving into the issue. I looked through the mentioned places in the
bsdinstall code and understand it now.
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:24:48 +0400
Darren Baginski wrote:
> I thing release/arch selection has to be a part of the installer, either
> directly or via environment v
a different one. Since then I upgraded from
>> 9.0-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE-p3 using freebsd-update.
>>
>> Here are the symptoms:
>>
>> (2) FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 amd64: After typing "bsdinstall..." it brings me
>> directly to the mirror selection list, b
; Here are the symptoms:
>
> (2) FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 amd64: After typing "bsdinstall..." it brings me
> directly to the mirror selection list, but after selecting a mirror it aborts
> with an error message "An installation step has beeen aborted. Would you like
&g
-be-used mirror. Also re-trying it on the original system(1)
leads to an error but a different one. Since then I upgraded from 9.0-RELEASE
to 9.0-RELEASE-p3 using freebsd-update.
Here are the symptoms:
(2) FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 amd64: After typing "bsdinstall..." it brings me
direc
On 21/07/2012 22:06, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
I assume you have compiled the bootblocks as per the instruction in the
handbook.
Second, do you have more than one serial port on the box because FreeBSD can
only work its serial console magic on only one port at a time.
If you redirect your
I assume you have compiled the bootblocks as per the instruction in the
handbook.
Second, do you have more than one serial port on the box because FreeBSD can
only work its serial console magic on only one port at a time.
If you redirect your IPMI serial console or just a normal serial console,
1 - 100 of 2031 matches
Mail list logo
