That's because you are "a wireless guy" :-)
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:33:31PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> Oh it is fun. :)
>
> +a
> On Sep 8, 2014 10:54 PM, "Kevin Lo" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:11:20AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > >
> > > The problem -is- the money. The peo
Oh it is fun. :)
+a
On Sep 8, 2014 10:54 PM, "Kevin Lo" wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:11:20AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> > The problem -is- the money. The people will come when there's enough
> > interest and enough money.
> >
> > The problem is that people think things like wifi dri
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:11:20AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> The problem -is- the money. The people will come when there's enough
> interest and enough money.
>
> The problem is that people think things like wifi drivers that are
> debugged, perform well and get updated as new standards appe
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:11:20, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> The problem -is- the money. The people will come when there's enough
> interest and enough money.
>
> The problem is that people think things like wifi drivers that are
> debugged, perform well and get updated as new standards appear is a
>
The problem -is- the money. The people will come when there's enough
interest and enough money.
The problem is that people think things like wifi drivers that are
debugged, perform well and get updated as new standards appear is a
few months effort - and I think the herculean efforts done in the p
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 04:17:28PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>
>
> On 08/31/14 00:46, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 30 August 2014 12:57, wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:16:04PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>> So yeah. Almost all of the work is done in the atheros driver side of
> >>
On 08/31/14 00:46, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 30 August 2014 12:57, wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:16:04PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> So yeah. Almost all of the work is done in the atheros driver side of
>>> things. Heck, the AR9271 bits for the HAL are likely just an evenings
>>> worth
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014, atar wrote:
Here's additional place where FreeBSD has lack of support: USB based printers.
Here's a citation from the FreeBSD handbook (page no. 251):
USB interfaces, named for the Universal Serial Bus, can run at even
faster speeds than parallel or RS-232 serial interfac
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:40 PM, atar wrote:
> Here's additional place where FreeBSD has lack of support: USB based
> printers.
>
> Here's a citation from the FreeBSD handbook (page no. 251):
Why don't you try citing a non-ancient version the handbook? Like here:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/e
Here's additional place where FreeBSD has lack of support: USB based printers.
Here's a citation from the FreeBSD handbook (page no. 251):
> USB interfaces, named for the Universal Serial Bus, can run at even faster
> speeds than parallel or RS-232 serial interfaces. Cables are simple and
> che
On 30 August 2014 12:57, wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:16:04PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> So yeah. Almost all of the work is done in the atheros driver side of
>> things. Heck, the AR9271 bits for the HAL are likely just an evenings
>> worth of work for me. I just don't want to deal with
Hi,
The main issue is this: I really don't like the USB driver stuff in the kernel.
When I last checked, there was no clean example of a wifi or ethernet
driver which handles all of the odd corner cases of things correctly.
So you'd end up with things like taskqueues still running whilst the
NIC
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:39:56AM +0300, atar wrote:
> So you give me additional reason to stay with Linux and not to migrate
> to FreeBSD since even a basic wireless adapter which came with your
> Sony isn't supported by FreeBSD. To be honest, I don't know if your
> Sony wireless adapter is suppo
So you give me additional reason to stay with Linux and not to migrate to
FreeBSD since even a basic wireless adapter which came with your Sony isn't
supported by FreeBSD. To be honest, I don't know if your Sony wireless adapter
is supported by Linux, but in general, I think linux is more flexib
I bought a TL-WN725N and a TL-WN723N
the model WN725N is better, and smaller
both from tplink
and both works out of the box with FreeBSD 10 stable AMD64
I use them on a sony that have a wireless chip not recognizeable by
FreeBSD.
the only "catch" is to load the driver at boot (loader.conf) and ac
Maybe, but it has about above half of a year since I've saw this limitation in
FreeBSD and this still wasn't fixed so I haven't too much hopes it will be
fixed in the near future.
> Well the page states "The AR7010 and AR9271 NICs are not yet supported - the
> USB glue needs writing for ath(4).
Well the page states "The AR7010 and AR9271 NICs are not yet supported -
the USB glue needs writing for ath(4)."
So it might happen :)
Ofc only the maintainer can tell, and he was already done some many and
great work on this.
Melhores Cumprimentos // Best Regards
--
Ok, I've understood the point. So probably there's no way to use this popular
TP-LINK dongle with FreeBSD. Very alas. Disappointed.
> On 26/08/2014 08:32, atar wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> According to what's written in the following URLs:
> > http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?t=41581 ,
> > h
On 26/08/2014 08:32, atar wrote:
Hi there!
According to what's written in the following URLs:
> http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?t=41581 ,
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath_hal(4)/HardwareSupport
> (under the 'Chipsets I won't be working on' section) the
> TL-WN722N TP-LINK wireless don
Hi there!
According to what's written in the following URLs:
http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?t=41581 ,
https://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath_hal(4)/HardwareSupport (under the 'Chipsets I
won't be working on' section) the TL-WN722N TP-LINK wireless dongle isn't
supported on freeBSD since it
20 matches
Mail list logo
