that WikiWomenCamp[1] is going to
exclude men from participating. I unsubscribe from this mailing list. Good
luck.
[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiWomenCamp
2012/2/12 John Vandenberg
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:44 AM, emijrp wrote:
> > ..
> > By the way, I'm interested in sea
It is a good work Sarah. But I don't understand why those lists where women
are separated from men are needed. I think that the only reason is that
there are persons who would need to read only about "female chessplayers",
"female ...", etc. But in the same fashion, there are persons who need to
re
2012/2/5 Delphine Ménard
> Also, I just realized that with SUL, the gender is not passed from one
> wiki to the other, and frankly, I doubt people revisit their
> preferences for each wiki (my account is active on 108 wikis... I'm
> never gonna change all of those !*) they do 100 edits on. Just a
2012/2/1 emijrp
> ... and I'm thinking about an analysis of male-female biographies ratio
> between Wikipedias.
>
After an analysis of a sample of 364k biographies where ~44% of them where
classified using he/she his/her word occurences, it shows only 6.2% of
female biograph
2012/2/2 Caroline Becker
> That was irony, sorry :) I'm against image filtering and I think image
> filtering has nothing to do with gender gap, so I answered with my guts
> instead of my brain :(
>
> Caroline
>
>
I got your sarcasm Caroline. Is Ryan the new Sheldon? Attention: sarcasm.
>
> 201
Here is the accumulate by project family
http://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wmcharts/wmchart0013.html Wikiquote,
Wikisource and Wikiversity are the winners.
2012/2/2 John Vandenberg
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, emijrp wrote:
> > 2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch
> >>...
> >>
2012/2/2 Sarah Stierch
> On 2/1/12 5:39 PM, Sarah wrote:
>
>
> That's very interesting, thank you (and somewhat depressing).
>
> Sarah
>
> ___
>
>
>
> Yeah, it just shows that we need to take action.
>
We need to take action if a low number of women m
Hi all;
Is there any up-to-date statistical tools monitoring gender gap? I have
started this basic one[1], and I'm thinking about an analysis of
male-female biographies ratio between Wikipedias.
Suggestions and links to tools are welcome.
Regards,
emijrp
[1] http://toolserver.org/~e
No. You just want to write a book with no rigor.
2012/2/1 Béria Lima
> We are not trying to fix gender gap here (here means: WWCamp ) Emijrp.
> _
> *Béria Lima*
> Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt>
> (351) 963 953 042
>
> *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qual
2012/2/1 Béria Lima
> I can't answer for her, but I believe she was only gathering data. Since
> she isn't Brazilian or Indian or Dutch, maybe might be difficult for her to
> know what is excatly relevant or not.
>
>
The problem here is that you musn't try to fix a bias or imbalance (in this
case
Thanks
2012/1/7 Federico Leva (Nemo)
> emijrp, 07/01/2012 13:31:
> > Yes, I will contact Spanish wikisource. Regards.
>
> In the meanwhile I've placed it on archive.org, Commons and es.source:
> <
> https://es.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Especial:C
Yes, I will contact Spanish wikisource. Regards.
2012/1/7 Pete Forsyth
> Hi Emijrp,
>
> Looks like a great find!
>
> It seems to me that transcribing these volumes onto Wikisource would be a
> great step toward getting them used as sources for Wikipedia articles. In
> case
...with biographies about females, 3 volumes:
- Volume 1: http://books.google.es/books?id=zhxCuOr0gREC&pg=PR3&hl=es
- Volume 2:
http://books.google.es/books?id=VBZt5xlN4L0C&printsec=frontcover&hl=es&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0
- Volume 3:
http://books.google.es/books?id=ETgB
2011/12/1 Carol Moore
> On 11/29/2011 5:19 PM, emijrp wrote:
> >
> >
> > So, the first step would be to try and figure out if women are
> > visiting the site and not editing or just not visiting at all, before
> > saying nonsense about sexism and Wikipedia comm
2011/11/29 Thomas Dalton
> On 29 November 2011 21:51, emijrp wrote:
> > Dear all;
> >
> > We have heard many times that most Wikipedians are male, but have you
> heard
> > about gender and fundraising? Some data from a 2010 study[1] and a 2011
> > German st
neither are
interested on editing nor funding free knowledge.
Is WMF working to increase female donors just like female editors?
Regards,
emijrp
[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2010FR_Donor_survey_report.pdf
[2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Detailed_results.pdf
I see both:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Men%27s_national_sports_teams_of_Australia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Women%27s_national_sports_teams_of_Australia
2011/3/15 Laura Hale
> I was looking at Wikipedia and one of the articles I watch got moved into a
> subcategory: Wome
I'm glad to read about a more wide concept of gap, not focused only in
gender gap. Why there is not a general mailing list for any class of gap?
I'm trying to compile info about any posible biases and gaps here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emijrp/Systemic_bias Work in progress.
Sorry, but I
18 matches
Mail list logo
