On 17/3/03 1:24 "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that there's been problem with the Servlet EG this time around,
> but what I'm saying is that there are avenues that we _could_ have
> used to voice our concerns, but we didn't for some reason. There are a
> number of mailing lis
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 16/3/03 20:20 "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir, I _really_ am in troubles when dealing with Servlets. I cannot raise
issues on the tomcat-dev mailing lists, all I can do is discuss them with
Jon and Jason, as they both are on the spec...
You can raise and di
| > Software history is replete with creation of new "economic tiers". Even
| > "open-source" has it's GPL, BSD and countless other camplets. If an
| > existing organization can't serve multiple audiences, is there room and
| > reason for a supplemental one?
| >
|
| You mean is there room
| As you are on the EG yourself, you know how hard it is to have one word
| removed from the next revision of the spec once it gets in :-)
|
| Just thinking out loud...
|
| Pier
When a culture of discussion comes into conflict with a culture of
bureaucracy, debate is not an optimal change ins
On 16/3/03 23:32 "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I *think* that you should be able to discuss the issues with any
> ASF member, if you are representing the ASF on the EG, not just other
> EG members. We all are bound by the agreements made by the ASF.
In fact I post my con
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 02:53 PM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 12/3/03 6:53 "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 10:58 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
As it turns out, there is substantial room for innovation and debate
in
the implementation of API spec
On 16/3/03 20:20 "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Geir, I _really_ am in troubles when dealing with Servlets. I cannot raise
>> issues on the tomcat-dev mailing lists, all I can do is discuss them with
>> Jon and Jason, as they both are on the spec...
>
> You can raise and discuss
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 12/3/03 6:53 "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 10:58 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
As it turns out, there is substantial room for innovation and debate in
the implementation of API specs like servlet and JSP (see the history
On 12/3/03 6:53 "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 10:58 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>>
>> As it turns out, there is substantial room for innovation and debate in
>> the implementation of API specs like servlet and JSP (see the history
>> of
>>
Doh! someone just sent this to me. I didn't notice the date! thanks
for pointing that out.
Theoretically I suppose you could patent OLE 2 Compound document format...
"Bad way to aggregate objects into a mock filesystem inside of a file"
Glad its old news!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link
10 matches
Mail list logo
