>> Just a billion switch
>
> which is running a firewall?
>
> (The tcpdump shows a firewall is in play on 192.168.1.250).
The firewall's disabled, and should only be in play if the packet gets
routed from what I understand. These packets are being switched. I
guess I should connect the hosts
On Friday 23 Sep 2011 00:10:31 Adam Carter wrote:
> > is there anything in between on the network?
>
> Just a billion switch
which is running a firewall?
(The tcpdump shows a firewall is in play on 192.168.1.250).
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed m
Saw this on the pfSense list:
http://shader.kaist.edu/packetshader/
anyone interested in trying?
Rgds,
So I'm about to play with installing Gentoo on another system.
Now, the ritual goes, grab the ISO, burn the ISO, grab the latest
stage3, the latest Portage, and go to town.
What I'd like to do is drop the stage3 and Portage snapshots onto the
ISO before burning, but I've never done anything with
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
>> strace output? Which syscall is actually failing, and with what error code?
>
> What would I trace? Why do you think the information provided suggests
> a syscall failing?
Misread your original post.
--
:wq
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:32:07 +0200
"Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" wrote:
> El 22/09/11 22:30, Alan McKinnon escribió:
> > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:09:14 +0200
> > "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)"
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> I wish people wouldn't just remove stuff without full det
El 23/09/11 01:02, Mike Edenfield escribió:
> On 9/22/2011 5:51 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
>> El 22/09/11 22:20, Michael Mol escribió:
>>> My question is...what kinds?
>
>> Well mainly the PaX and the grsecurity patches. I also heard there is a
>> WIP in bringing RSBAC ba
> strace output? Which syscall is actually failing, and with what error code?
What would I trace? Why do you think the information provided suggests
a syscall failing?
>> ssh works. Connection from the same client to a third gentoo box
>> running a webserver works.
>
> KISS may be at work here.
>
> go and delete the ".ssh/known_hosts"
> files just to be certain it not something
> really simple
That file just contains the cached ssh host keys - nothing to do
> is there anything in between on the network?
Just a billion switch
> does traceroute show anything unusual?
Nothing to trace - same subnet
> what happens if you try to connect to a closed port (81 for example)?
I get the expected TCP reset.
> It's not the ICMP that is being prohibited.
Understood, that's clear from the packet trace.
> is an ICMP "host unreachable" response from .250. The extended reason
> for the unreachability is that there is an administrative policy
> preventing the traffic. It almost certainly *is* a firewall t
On 9/22/2011 5:51 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
(klondike) wrote:
El 22/09/11 22:20, Michael Mol escribió:
My question is...what kinds?
Well mainly the PaX and the grsecurity patches. I also heard there is a
WIP in bringing RSBAC back again too.
Does gentoo-sources include the SELinux
On Thursday 22 Sep 2011 08:53:46 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 21.09.2011 23:58, schrieb Mick:
> > On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> >>> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer?
> >>
> >> I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works
> >> just f
On Thursday 22 Sep 2011 09:15:42 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 09/22/2011 12:58 AM, Mick wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> >>> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer?
> >>
> >> I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works
> >> jus
El 22/09/11 22:20, Michael Mol escribió:
> My question is...what kinds?
Well mainly the PaX and the grsecurity patches. I also heard there is a
WIP in bringing RSBAC back again too.
> For what reason is there a set of "makes
> it more secure" patches that aren't integrated into the mainline
> ker
El 22/09/11 22:30, Alan McKinnon escribió:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:09:14 +0200
> "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" wrote:
>
>>> I wish people wouldn't just remove stuff without full details. If
>>> there's an issue with that code, there should be a bug at b.g.o. and
>>> the Changelog sh
El 22/09/11 22:07, Manuel McLure escribió:
> On Sep 21, 2011 9:13 PM, "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)"
> wrote:
>> Well deprecated version removal tends to happen because we are not
>> going
>> to aim for those versions stabilization AND there is a newer version
>> available AND upstrea
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> I'll assume for the moment that the hardened-sources patch set
> discussed includes security improvements.
>
> My question is...what kinds? For what reason is there a set of "makes
> it more secure" patches that aren't integrated into the mainl
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:09:14 +0200
"Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)" wrote:
> > I wish people wouldn't just remove stuff without full details. If
> > there's an issue with that code, there should be a bug at b.g.o. and
> > the Changelog should mention it.
> >
> > Then folks like yoursel
I'll assume for the moment that the hardened-sources patch set
discussed includes security improvements.
My question is...what kinds? For what reason is there a set of "makes
it more secure" patches that aren't integrated into the mainline
kernel? Are they just not stable in some fashion? Do they
On Sep 21, 2011 9:13 PM, "Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)"
wrote:
>
> Well deprecated version removal tends to happen because we are not
> going
> to aim for those versions stabilization AND there is a newer version
> available AND upstream tends to ignore bugs happening on older
> versi
On 22 September 2011 00:18, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 22.09.2011 07:56, schrieb Mick:
>> On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 23:02:02 Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to install Graphviz but I get:
>>>
>>> centaur ~ # emerge graphviz
>>>
>>> make[3]: Entering directory
>>> `/var/tmp/po
>Hmm, odd. I thought everyone used to be able to reopen bugs.
Ooops. i assumed the opposite because several people complained about
having the same bug after it was closed in the comments but did not
reopen it. But in fact i did not try. Shame on me :)
>Well, it looks like mailto:vap...@gentoo.or
Am 22.09.2011 12:22, schrieb Jonas de Buhr:
> Hi guys,
>
> i just ran into this bug again:
>
> sys-devel/gcc-config suggests gcc re-merge when profile is invalid
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290437
>
> which is in status RESOLVED FIXED which is clearly not the case.
>
> who can ch
Adam Carter gmail.com> writes:
> ssh works. Connection from the same client to a third gentoo box
> running a webserver works.
KISS may be at work here.
go and delete the ".ssh/known_hosts"
files just to be certain it not something
really simple
hth,
James
On 09/17/2011 07:00 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> There was a standards body tracking ORB, I forget which one, but none
> of that matters as the folks who should use it - system builders - saw
> it's flaws quite quickly. Even Gnome has dropped it and are now moving
> over to dbus.
Ooh, I know this
>> what about connecting to the webserver from that third gentoo box?
>
>Same ICMP response, so its not a client side issue.
yep.
>No iptables on any of the boxes. No tcpwrappers.
is there anything in between on the network?
does traceroute show anything unusual?
what happens if you try to co
On 22 September 2011 12:39, Adam Carter wrote:
> # tcpdump -n -i eth0 host 192.168.1.6 and port not 22
> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
> listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
> 21:10:57.011994 IP 192.168.1.6.46161 > 192.1
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Jonas de Buhr wrote:
>>>ssh works.
>>
>> routing should be ok then.
>>
>>>Connection from the same client to a third gentoo box
>>>running a webserver works.
>>
>> what about connecting to the webserver from t
Am 22.09.2011 14:22, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> It could be that you're one of the few people actually using OTRS.
phew. I thought it is quite popular. Maybe not for gentoo-users.
> There are 2 older versions in layman overlays:
>
> # eix otrs
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Jonas de Buhr wrote:
>>ssh works.
>
> routing should be ok then.
>
>>Connection from the same client to a third gentoo box
>>running a webserver works.
>
> what about connecting to the webserver from that third gentoo box?
Same ICMP response, so its not a client
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 01:49:14 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 22.09.2011 13:29, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> > Please don't CC me into all the emails, list-mails end up correctly.
>
> sorry for the noise
>
> >> otrs doesn't have that flag!
> >
> > Just noticed, the 3.x versions appe
>ssh works.
routing should be ok then.
>Connection from the same client to a third gentoo box
>running a webserver works.
what about connecting to the webserver from that third gentoo box?
>Anyone seen this behavior? There's no iptables,
you did check that on both machines, didn't you?
what a
Am 22.09.2011 13:29, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> Please don't CC me into all the emails, list-mails end up correctly.
sorry for the noise
>> otrs doesn't have that flag!
>
> Just noticed, the 3.x versions appear to have that flag removed. I
> wonder why they did that as it makes managing webappli
# netstat -antp | grep apach
tcp0 0 192.168.1.250:800.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 25577/apache2
# tcpdump -n -i eth0 host 192.168.1.6 and port not 22
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
Please don't CC me into all the emails, list-mails end up correctly.
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 01:10:48 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 22.09.2011 12:41, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> > On Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:25:59 PM Stefan G. Weichinger
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Am 22.09.2011 12:09
Am 22.09.2011 12:41, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:25:59 PM Stefan G. Weichinger
> wrote:
>> Am 22.09.2011 12:09, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
>>> I have been using webapp-config for all the webapps on my server
>>> and it does work for me. Not seen that error before. I
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:25:59 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 22.09.2011 12:09, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> > I have been using webapp-config for all the webapps on my server and
> > it does work for me. Not seen that error before. I am wondering if
> > something might be configured i
Am 22.09.2011 12:09, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> I have been using webapp-config for all the webapps on my server and
> it does work for me. Not seen that error before. I am wondering if
> something might be configured incorrectly.
>
> Do you have the folder: "/usr/share/webapps/otrs/3.0.10" ?
No
Hi guys,
i just ran into this bug again:
sys-devel/gcc-config suggests gcc re-merge when profile is invalid
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290437
which is in status RESOLVED FIXED which is clearly not the case.
who can change the status of a bug?
/jonas
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:19:15 PM Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> > Anyone installed otrs with webapp-config?
> > I just don't get it!
> >
> > otrs emerged fine, but I get:
> >
> > # webapp-config -I -h localhost -d 'otrs' ot
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 11:11:52 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Anyone installed otrs with webapp-config?
> I just don't get it!
>
> otrs emerged fine, but I get:
>
> # webapp-config -I -h localhost -d 'otrs' otrs 3.0.10
> * Fatal error: Unable to determine location of master copy
> * F
Am 22.09.2011 11:19, schrieb Marius Vaitiekunas:
> Hi,
> I strongly suggest you to use source package installation method. I am
> using it without any problem.
*sigh*
hmm, thanks
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Anyone installed otrs with webapp-config?
> I just don't get it!
>
> otrs emerged fine, but I get:
>
> # webapp-config -I -h localhost -d 'otrs' otrs 3.0.10
> * Fatal error: Unable to determine location of master copy
> * Fatal erro
Anyone installed otrs with webapp-config?
I just don't get it!
otrs emerged fine, but I get:
# webapp-config -I -h localhost -d 'otrs' otrs 3.0.10
* Fatal error: Unable to determine location of master copy
* Fatal error(s) - aborting
Could someone please help?
google doesn't get me fitting answ
Mick writes:
> On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 23:02:02 Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to install Graphviz but I get:
[...]
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
> > cannot find -lpng14
[...]
> > Is there something I can do about this? Or is
On 09/22/2011 12:58 AM, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer?
I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works
just fine for me.
Any idea when ffmpeg-mt might make it to the main portage tree?
Am 21.09.2011 23:58, schrieb Mick:
> On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 09:19:39 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
>>> Does mplayer2 work with smplayer or kmplayer?
>>
>> I use mplayer2 with smplayer for a few month now and everything works
>> just fine for me.
>
> Any idea when ffmpeg-mt might make it to the main po
Am 22.09.2011 07:56, schrieb Mick:
> On Wednesday 21 Sep 2011 23:02:02 Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to install Graphviz but I get:
>>
>> centaur ~ # emerge graphviz
>>
>> make[3]: Entering directory
>> `/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r3/work/graphviz-2.26.3/plugin/
49 matches
Mail list logo
