Hi,
would anybody please be so kind to explain to me the rational used by
portage to re-emerge
some packages.
I've installed portage 2.2.7 and when I try to emerge, say,
app-shells/zsh-completions
it re-emerges (emerge -vp shows 'rR') several packages including,
i.e., app-office/libreof
On 27/09/2013 10:24, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
> would anybody please be so kind to explain to me the rational used by
> portage to re-emerge
> some packages.
>
> I've installed portage 2.2.7 and when I try to emerge, say,
> app-shells/zsh-completions
> it re-emerges (emerge -vp shows 'rR')
On 09/27/2013 11:09:11 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 27/09/2013 10:24, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
> would anybody please be so kind to explain to me the rational used
by
> portage to re-emerge
> some packages.
>
> I've installed portage 2.2.7 and when I try to emerge, say,
> app-shells/zsh-com
I am back from my visit at a customer where I installed a new and shiny
gentoo server for running VMs (KVM).
Currently I don't have access as my VPN only works from my static IP at
home (my router seems to be offline right now ... and I am still away
from office for the weekend) so I can't check
Am 25.09.2013 01:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> systemd-analyze blame to see what is taking so long.
>
> systemd-delta to see what changes from upstream do you have.
Thanks ... I cleaned up some cruft already and will test some
boot-process soon. Still on the road ...
>> I realized I only need two types of systems in my life. One hosted
>> server and bunch of identical laptops. My laptop, my wife's laptop,
>> our HTPC, routers, and office workstations could all be on identical
>> hardware, and what better choice than a laptop? Extremely
>> space-efficient, po
On 2013.09.27 at 10:24 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
> would anybody please be so kind to explain to me the rational used by
> portage to re-emerge
> some packages.
>
> I've installed portage 2.2.7 and when I try to emerge, say,
> app-shells/zsh-completions
> it re-emerges (emerge -vp
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:28:43AM +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>
> Here is a full example:
> emerge -auv1 app-shells/zsh-completions
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies - * Digest verification failed:
> * /LOCAL/local/portage/dev-python/wxp
130927 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
> you are encountering a relatively new feature of portage
> that is supposed to make revdep-rebuild & emerge @preserve-rebuild obsolete.
> The logic is, that if you update a package, other packages
> depending on this package will automatically rebuild to preve
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 07:18:08 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> I have found sometimes that Portage wants to remerge LO or similar,
> but in fact the existing installed version continues to work regardless.
That's because you aren't using the broken bits. But that's fine as long
as it continues to work
The 27/09/13, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I am back from my visit at a customer where I installed a new and shiny
> gentoo server for running VMs (KVM).
>
> Currently I don't have access as my VPN only works from my static IP at
> home (my router seems to be offline right now ... and I am sti
Am 27.09.2013 15:02, schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht:
> You should give details of the tests. It looks like a hard disk write
> speed bottleneck.
I will get access again on monday.
That's a hardware RAID-10 on 6 SAS disks ... that should be fast enough ...
The 27/09/13, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 27.09.2013 15:02, schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht:
>
> > You should give details of the tests. It looks like a hard disk write
> > speed bottleneck.
>
> I will get access again on monday.
>
> That's a hardware RAID-10 on 6 SAS disks ... that should be fast
Am 27.09.2013 15:18, schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht:
> Try avoiding to write on disks. Use devices /dev/null and /dev/zero with
> both protocol and command lines not optimizing zeros for network tests.
>
> You could also use dedicated network performance tools if you have
> install rights.
Will do nex
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:38:44PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.09.27 at 10:24 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > would anybody please be so kind to explain to me the rational used by
> > portage to re-emerge
> > some packages.
> >
> > I've installed portage 2.2.7 and when
Am 27.09.2013 12:33, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> I am back from my visit at a customer where I installed a new and shiny
> gentoo server for running VMs (KVM).
>
> Currently I don't have access as my VPN only works from my static IP at
> home (my router seems to be offline right now ... and I a
On 27/09/2013 12:37, Grant wrote:
>>> I realized I only need two types of systems in my life. One hosted
>>> server and bunch of identical laptops. My laptop, my wife's laptop,
>>> our HTPC, routers, and office workstations could all be on identical
>>> hardware, and what better choice than a lap
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> I'm slowly coming to conclsuion that you are trying to solve a problem
> with Gentoo that binary distros already solved a very long time ago. You
> are forcing yourself to become the sole maintainer of GrantOS and do all
> the heavy lifting of packaging. But, M
mingdao@workstation ~ $ eselect news read
2013-09-27-initramfs-required
Title Separate /usr on Linux requires initramfs
AuthorWilliam Hubbs
Posted2013-09-27
Revision 1
Linux systems which have / and /usr on separ
On 27/09/2013 13:18, Philip Webb wrote:
> 130927 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
>> you are encountering a relatively new feature of portage
>> that is supposed to make revdep-rebuild & emerge @preserve-rebuild obsolete.
>> The logic is, that if you update a package, other packages
>> depending on th
Bruce Hill wrote:
> mingdao@workstation ~ $ eselect news read
> 2013-09-27-initramfs-required
> Title Separate /usr on Linux requires initramfs
> AuthorWilliam Hubbs
> Posted2013-09-27
> Revision 1
>
> Linux syste
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Bruce Hill wrote:
> > mingdao@workstation ~ $ eselect news read
> > 2013-09-27-initramfs-required
> > Title Separate /usr on Linux requires initramfs
> > AuthorWilliam Hubbs
> > Posted
Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>> I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't have to worry about this.
>> If I do, this could get interesting, again. Dale
> Do you have /usr separate from / ?
Yep. From my understanding tho, eudev is not supposed to be a
On 28/09/2013 00:57, Dale wrote:
> Bruce Hill wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>>> I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't have to worry about this.
>>> If I do, this could get interesting, again. Dale
>> Do you have /usr separate from / ?
>
> Yep. From my under
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 01:10:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> One of the very first things you do with /usr at boot time is mount it,
> and from then on you use it exactly as if it were always on / anyway.
> I'll bet that since you moved all of portage out, your mount options and
> fs configs are the
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:57:06PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Bruce Hill wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't have to worry about this.
> >> If I do, this could get interesting, again. Dale
> > Do you have /usr separate from / ?
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 01:10:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01:
> On 28/09/2013 00:57, Dale wrote:
> > Bruce Hill wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> >>> I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't
27 matches
Mail list logo