On 12/19/2016 02:20 AM, mark_at_yahoo via gimp-user-list wrote:
> Problem #2: Tear-off menus (2.8.16 again) don't work, at least in my
> environment (Linux, X11, FVWM window manager). For example,
> right-click-and-hold in an image window, move down to "Colors >", move
> across to the submenu an
On 12/19/2016 08:14 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
To duplicate this behavior, use the tear off menu function on Linux.
That's it: As far as I know, it's the same with all distros and window
managers: I have seen it on Ubuntu and Mint (both Debian based) and
under Gnome, Cinnamon and XFCE4. I think i
On 12/19/2016 09:04 AM, mark_at_yahoo via gimp-user-list wrote:
So this is a longstanding bug? I vaguely remember doing it
sans-workaround "way back when" == unknown version.
Late-breaking news: I went into my personal, "posts I found interesting
enough to save" archives of this list and found
Hi Gimp users, I'd like to know if there is a (simple) way to load the curves
for the curve blend filter from a path. Background: I'd like to create a special
kind of little planet projection for which I need to distort the base image in a
way that allows me to define the horizon by a path. If the
hello, i'm making an image which needs to have a certain width and length.
problem is that when i use the tool Filters > Decor > Border and add the same
exact number of px the Y and X columns, the image does not maintain proportions
with the border added. why?it should add the same exact amount of
i have an image sized 650x1000.
if i go to image > scale image and lock the chain to Keep Aspect and resize
width to 655, the height is adjusted to 1008 - 3 px more - why?
--
Mattia (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List ad
>hello, i'm making an image which needs to have a certain width and
>length. problem is that when i use the tool Filters > Decor > Border
>and add the same exact number of px the Y and X columns, the image
>does not maintain proportions with the border added. why?it should add
>the same exact amoun
>After 13+ years I let my subscription to gimp-user-list lapse due to
>excessive bounces (don't know why that was happening). I wasn't
>following it too much anymore. So of course a month later I have to do
>some Gimping, run into problems, and need to re-subscribe. Teaches me
>a
>lesson. ;)
>
>T
>hello, i'm making an image which needs to have a certain width and
>length. problem is that when i use the tool Filters > Decor > Border
>and add the same exact number of px the Y and X columns, the image
>does not maintain proportions with the border added. why?it should add
>the same exact amoun
>i have an image sized 650x1000.
>if i go to image > scale image and lock the chain to Keep Aspect and
>resize width to 655, the height is adjusted to 1008 - 3 px more - why?
Gimp works in pixels, and whole numbers, there is a round up/round down
involved.
1000 / 650 is a ratio of 1.53846.. mult
On 12/19/2016 03:01 AM, programmer_ceds wrote:
I have made a number of changes to this script over the years, the most recent,
in 2014, being to allow curved arrows. I added an entry to the registry with a
note to say that I couldn't upload the script but posted a link to it instead.
There were a
thank you for the help, much appreciated.
this will cause the border to look uneven however, isn't there a work around to
this?
also, it's not clear to me why 400 x 200 and 420 x 220 is not keeping aspect
ratio? the vertical increases exactly the same amount of the horizontal
>If you add the s
i think when adding the border the canvas also expands to contain it, no?
the border is inside the canvas then, right?
>If you need the border inside the canvas then
>
>Select -> All ctrl-A
>
>Edit -> Stroke Selection with the width twice the required border
>size.
--
Mattia (via www.gimpusers
>i think when adding the border the canvas also expands to contain it,
>no?
>the border is inside the canvas then, right?
Canvas size remains the same, border is inside the canvas.
You are stroking a selection, the width of the stroke is half inside the canvas,
hence the need to double the requir
Mattia,
You said:
also, it's not clear to me why 400 x 200 and 420 x 220 is not keeping
aspect ratio? the vertical increases exactly the same amount of the
horizontal
It sounds to me like the problem is that you are confusing "same amount"
with "same proportion". They are _not_ the same
>also, it's not clear to me why 400 x 200 and 420 x 220 is not keeping
>aspect ratio? the vertical increases exactly the same amount of the
>horizontal
To put it slightly differently you can think of the aspect ratio as being the
width divided by the height.
400/200 = 2.0
420/220 = 1.90909
>Thanks, programmer_ceds. Yes, I saw your page on the registry but
>didn't follow the link to the actual script. My bad.
>
>(BTW, I got your post to the list hours after my previous replies.
>This
>had been happening for the last year or two I was on the list -- I'd
>get
>posts out of order, and d
Does it seem like this question comes up on a monthly basis?
GIMP could REALLY use some ability to make ad-hoc edits to its otherwise
ready-only assets (gradients and brush dynamics, vector brushes, etc.).
Requiring users to duplicate one of these before they're allowed to change any
of those
"...if you can't duplicate something from the Gradient editor then go to the
Gradients list and duplicate it from there."
No can do either way.
Rick S
-Original Message-
From: Richard
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 8:15 PM
To: Mark Morin ; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp
19 matches
Mail list logo
