When calling
git show
on a simple commit (i.e. not a merge commit) git will show the commit
message and the modified files including their diffs. Adding "--name-only"
will list only the file names of the modified files.
On the other hand, when running "git show" against a merge commit, thin
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 05:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
eamira...@gmail.com wrote:
> so we have a master source and some different sources
> for different projectsfor example our bank organization project
> has some parts different from our university project
> 1.Could we have different branches for every
I'm new to git.I'm not a professional person in programming.I work in R & D
group and I'm just researching about source control systems.our programming
group use VSS(sourcesafe) but I can see that they have encountered many
problems.so I want to help them to switch to git .I know about git featu
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Etienne Pouliot wrote:
> > > I'm trying to get my post-merge hook to run but I can't get it to
> > > work.
> > [...]
> > > #git pull
[...]
> > The merge did not happen because `git merge` (which was run as a
> > part of the `git pull` work flow) perfo
Hi,
(Scenario at the top, concrete questions below.)
I'm in the progress of migrating an SVN repository to Git, including
history, using "git svn". The SVN repository currently contains a number of
large (data) files:
- five binary files of 100 MB to 400 MB, with up to 17 revisions,
- eleven bi
