http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1499808/diff/14004/samples/showcase/src/com/google/gwt/sample/showcase/client/content/cell/CwCustomDataGrid.java
File
samples/showcase/src/com/google/gwt/sample/showcase/client/content/cell/CwCustomDataGrid.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/149
Revision: 10526
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Aug 15 16:12:14 2011
Log: Add missing gecko 5 libs for Linux64--they were dropped from the
original commit due to size
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10526
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-5.
Revision: 10525
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Aug 15 16:11:24 2011
Log: Add missing gecko 5 libs for Linux--they were dropped from the
original commit due to size
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10525
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-5.0.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1521803/diff/1/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml
File samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1521803/diff/1/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml#newcode34
samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml:34: JBoss Repo
On 2011/08/12 22:38:29, rjrjr wrote:
D
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1521803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1526803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/event/shared/testing/CountingEventBus.java
File
user/src/com/google/web/bindery/event/shared/testing/CountingEventBus.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1526803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/binder
The thing is, if B is a subtype of A, and B is rescued, then A is also
rescued.
Yeah, the rub is that B did not get rescued into FragmentB, it just
ended up there because it was in the set of FragmentA+FragmentB, but not
FragmentA or FragmentB individually, in which case it ends up in
whicheve
I still need to add a test for IsRenderable, but I think this patch is
ready for review.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1522803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1522803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
public class
TypeParser {
Are you intending to turn this into an API? My inclination is to make
the class package protected.
Oh, no, no plans for an API, just the default that I didn't catch. I
agree, package protected is preferable.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1505805/
--
http://
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:58 AM, wrote:
> If you mean the "Roll seed-function optimization forward again" commit
> [1] (or others before it), yeah, I was hoping that would fix it, but it
> did not.
It surprises me that CFA doesn't take care of this and that it needs
to be done as a fix up. One
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1505805/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/typemodel/TypeParser.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/typemodel/TypeParser.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1505805/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/typemodel/Type
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1490801/diff/5002/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1490801/diff/5002/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/Persistent
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1463802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1463802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/Compilati
On 2011/08/15 13:53:06, zundel wrote:
Please add acleung as a reviewer
Done.
(The edit issue form didn't recognize just "acleung", so I added
"acleung@google".com. Hope that's okay.)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributor
Did you try this against trunk or GWT 2.3/2.4? I made some changes
recently to the way liveness of class literals are calculated that may
or may not have an effect relative to this.
If you mean the "Roll seed-function optimization forward again" commit
[1] (or others before it), yeah, I was ho
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java#new
Revision: 10524
Author: bobv%google@gtempaccount.com
Date: Mon Aug 15 07:40:18 2011
Log: Edited wiki page RequestFactory_2_4 through web user interface.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10524
Modified:
/wiki/RequestFactory_2_4.wiki
=
Please add acleung as a reviewer
On 2011/08/05 21:19:37, stephenh wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1513803/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CodeSplitter.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1
Hi,
I recently introduced an ImageBundle to my code with 1000 images. Everything
worked ok, but I then converted it to a ClientBundle and found a couple of
problems:
(1) It seems that ClientBundle holds files open during the compilation where ImageBundle
does not. I had to dramatically increa
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1463802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationStateBuilder.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1463802/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/Compilati
21 matches
Mail list logo