Hi Willy and Lukas,
Could you please confirm, if we are planning to fix this in near feature.
If yes, please let us know
1. In which build it will be available?
2. Are we backporting it to previous builds from which it got removed?
Suraj Bora
surb...@cisco.com
Think before you print.
This email
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 07:42:11AM +, Suraj Bora -X (surbora - HCL AMERICA
INC at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi Willy and Lukas,
>
> Could you please confirm, if we are planning to fix this in near feature.
> If yes, please let us know
Sure it will be worked on but it's very low priority considering t
Hello again!
So, I've used tcpdump to capture the traffic on both sides - Haproxy and on
backend and ruled out the possible issue with Haproxy.
It's clearly not the load balancer issue, it looks like some module on
backend incorrectly sends a packet of binary service data (which most
likely should
Hi Willy,
On 2017-10-15 19:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
If everything goes well, the final rebased and cleaned up code should
be available for a release candidate by the end of the month.
Great, I will wait and see what you have available at the end of the
month. I'm in no hurry, I just wanted to
On 15/10/2017 07:02 μμ, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Sander,
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 04:27:15PM +0200, Sander Klein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I haven't been paying much attention to the list lately, but I am wondering
>> what the current status of http/2 support is in 1.8-(dev|snapshot).
>>
>> Is it in
Hi Pavlos!
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> > Now after several failed attempts and with a lot of design sessions
> > with my coworkers, I've made a good progress on a totally different
> > approach which will later allow us to implement HTTP/2 on both sides,
> >
Just want to report that changing to another DNS server made it take about
2 seconds instead of 3 minutes :)
Thanks for the help!
Joel W Kall
*Loop54*
Barnhusgatan 20
111 23 Stockholm
www.loop54.com
Mobil: 073-5933 255
j...@loop54.com
2017-10-13 23:45 GMT+02:00 Bap
Hi Willy,
Willy Tarreau wrote on 16.10.2017:
> Hi Pavlos!
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>> > Now after several failed attempts and with a lot of design sessions
>> > with my coworkers, I've made a good progress on a totally different
>> > approach which will
On 16/10/2017 11:27 πμ, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Pavlos!
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:46:44AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>>> Now after several failed attempts and with a lot of design sessions
>>> with my coworkers, I've made a good progress on a totally different
>>> approach which will lat
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:28:12PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> I guess following step-by-step approach, 1st client side, it makes sense as
> it reduces the size of breakage:-)
Yes but not only this. It's also the fact that the main benefits of H2 are
on the client side, where the latency is th
On 2017-10-16 14:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:28:12PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
I guess following step-by-step approach, 1st client side, it makes
sense as
it reduces the size of breakage:-)
Yes but not only this. It's also the fact that the main benefits of H2
are
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 08:07:17PM +0200, Sander Klein wrote:
> On 2017-10-16 14:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:28:12PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> > > I guess following step-by-step approach, 1st client side, it makes
> > > sense as
> > > it reduces the size of breakag
Hi all,
Aleksandar Lazic wrote on 16.10.2017:
[snipp]
> I have also started to create a image based on the h2 branch
> https://gitlab.com/aleks001/haproxy18-centos
> It's not finished yet but when it's finished you can use the docker
> image then from docker hub.
> https://hub.docker.com/u/m
Hi members of the list ,
I would like to know if you have any recommendation about this problem I have .
I'm running haproxy with a backend of apache2 web servers to loadbalance HTTP
services
In this model, I have better performance with "balance source" so I visitor
have the content deliver
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:54:10PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> 2017-10-15 23:43 GMT+05:00 Willy Tarreau :
>
> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 07:16:51PM +0100, Aaron West wrote:
> > > Hi Willy,
> > >
> > > Sorry to bother you, just a quick question if I may.
> > >
> > > Does support for QUIC imply
Hi Benoit,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:17:42AM +0200, Benoit GEORGELIN - Association
Web4all wrote:
> Hi members of the list ,
>
> I would like to know if you have any recommendation about this problem I have
> .
> I'm running haproxy with a backend of apache2 web servers to loadbalance HTTP
>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 01:00:53AM +, Tim Jones wrote:
> Background Print Service Equitrac
>
> Load Balancing 2 back-ends high ports when service is restarted the service
> comes up on a new random port, My backend config looks like this so I can
> survive at least some windows updates,
>
>
> Hi Benoit,
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:17:42AM +0200, Benoit GEORGELIN - Association
> Web4all
> wrote:
> > Hi members of the list ,
> > I would like to know if you have any recommendation about this problem I
> > have
> > .
> > I'm running haproxy with a backend of apache2 web servers to lo
18 matches
Mail list logo