Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-26 Thread Neil Duffee
ems Programming: Guilty, until proven innocent" John Norgauer 2004 > -Original Message- > From: David Cole [mailto:dbc...@colesoft.com] > Sent: October 25, 2011 19:20 > Subject: ABEND0F8-20 > > Does anyone know what an

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-26 Thread David Cole
pdated for some time, there will likely be an info APAR directing you to some web location where you can find all the missing information. That is not in place yet. I can confirm that ABEND0F8-20 is indeed "you issued an SVC other than SVC X'D' (ABEND) from code that resides &

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-26 Thread Bill Fairchild
Fairchild Rocket Software -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: ABEND0F8-20 >Only ABEND. All others disallowed. What does this response e

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-26 Thread Mark Zelden
I admit I had to read it twice, but I understood. Also I'm pretty sure this was mentioned not too long ago by (probably) Peter or Jim. Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com Mark's MVS Utiliti

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-26 Thread Peter Relson
e missing information. That is not in place yet. I can confirm that ABEND0F8-20 is indeed "you issued an SVC other than SVC X'D' (ABEND) from code that resides >= 2G" Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-25 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
;ABEND" answer. Granted it's late in my time zone and maybe the fog invading my mind would be burned off by morning, but then again, maybe not. :-) Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shane Sent: Tuesday, Octo

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-25 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>More than sufficient - and understandable. Not for all of us. I truly did NOT understand the response. If I did, I wouldn't have said I didn't. Not all of us know everything, despite claims to the contrary. Just because you understood it, doesn't mean the rest of us are so enlightened! - Ted Mac

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-25 Thread Shane
On the contrary - Dave asked a question, you answered it. More than sufficient - and understandable. Shane .. On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:22:33 -0400 Tom Harper wrote: > Maybe I was too brief. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / a

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-25 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <47d6ad63e3c0b4448c47ec031da080f525e6540...@mail34.thoughtbus.com>, on 10/25/2011 at 08:22 PM, Tom Harper said: >Maybe I was too brief. So was ted; he had no attribution line. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-25 Thread Tom Harper
Maybe I was too brief. It means that the only SVC allowed to be issued above the bar is ABEND. Tom - Original Message - From: Ted MacNEIL [mailto:eamacn...@yahoo.ca] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 08:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: ABEND0F8-20 >Only ABEND. All oth

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-25 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Only ABEND. All others disallowed. What does this response even mean? - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca Twitter: @TedMacNEIL -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu wi

Re: ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-25 Thread Tom Harper
Dave, Only ABEND. All others disallowed. Tom - Original Message - From: David Cole [mailto:dbc...@colesoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 07:19 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: ABEND0F8-20 Does anyone know what an abend s0F8-20 means? Code 20 is not documented even in R1.13

ABEND0F8-20

2011-10-25 Thread David Cole
Does anyone know what an abend s0F8-20 means? Code 20 is not documented even in R1.13's MVS System Codes manual. I suspect it means that you cannot issue an SVC instruction from above the bar. Can anyone confirm or deny that? Thanks, Dave Cole REPLY TO: dbc...@colesoft.com ColeS