http://www.interwise.com/live/viewevent.asp?eventid=574
Cheers,
Zoran.
--
If you find me, please return me to my $HOME: my address is 'cd'.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives
--- Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:31:36 -0800 (PST)
> Net Llama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have built and installed xfce and I can boot into it from
> the
> > > kde2 login.
> > > Looks great, exce
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Net Llama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have built and installed xfce and I can boot into it from the
> > kde2 login.
> > Looks great, except no text what so ever is inputed into any program.
> > Any i
--- Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have built and installed xfce and I can boot into it from the
> kde2 login.
> Looks great, except no text what so ever is inputed into any program.
> Any ideas.
> Caldera stock system ew 3.1.1 beta.
Can you elaborate on what you mean? Are you
I have built and installed xfce and I can boot into it from the kde2 login.
Looks great, except no text what so ever is inputed into any program. Any ideas.
Caldera stock system ew 3.1.1 beta.
cheers
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera Open Linux e
Quoting Dave Anselmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ian wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
> > When I traceroute, from home and school and compare them, the last
> four
> > hops are the same except for the machine directly in front my
> domain's
> > machine, which is part of the same network, 1 or 2 IP's off of the
this is a neat little gimmick I thought I'd share..
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [logs] Apache Logs
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:13:43 -0800
From: "Bill Burge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually I use (something like):
TransferLog "| /usr/bin/logger -p lo
Ian wrote:
[...]
> When I traceroute, from home and school and compare them, the last four
> hops are the same except for the machine directly in front my domain's
> machine, which is part of the same network, 1 or 2 IP's off of the hosts
> I can successfully route through.
I'm not a guru, but
I multiboot: Win98, Mandrake 8.1, Mandrake Cooker, Redmond and sometimes
ELX.
I recently had to reinstall Win98 because of disk corruption following a
lightning strike. Since then an old problem has resurfaced:
I mount my Win partitions in fstab like this:
/dev/hde1 /mnt/win/c vfat \
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:51:23 -0700
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It will be a few more months, probably, but gentoo will be the killer
> distro - my $.02.
guess I'd better have a look. Thanks.
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-u
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 21:07:56 -0800
Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:51:18 -0700
> Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > One other respondent on this thread (I lost the post) stated that ELX
> > overwrote his MBR. I selected the don't do anything opti
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:39:57 +1130
Mike Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:42, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > Another one to keep in mind is Borland, with the kylix thing being
updated> > to c++. Shouldn't be too long, and I've used C++Builder on
Windows with> > great pleasure.
This was mentioned in the article, I think. Oh, yeah, here it is...
http://www.open-mag.com/754088105111.htm
quote:
To round out our single processor CPU tests of the Intel compilers, we
turned our final attention on a system running with an AMD Athlon CPU. In
all previous tests with both the GNU
On Monday 28 Jan 2002 22:24, Ted Ozolins wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2002 02:11 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > On Monday 28 Jan 2002 02:33, Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
> > > Keith Antoine lamented:
> > > >I have had problems with Suse and printing, unfortunately your
> > > > hint didn't work either.
>
On Monday 28 January 2002 02:11 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Monday 28 Jan 2002 02:33, Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
> > Keith Antoine lamented:
> > >I have had problems with Suse and printing, unfortunately your hint
> > > didn't work either.
> >
> > Try turboprint. Use it with the "Generic UNIX LPD p
On Monday 28 January 2002 02:11 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Monday 28 Jan 2002 02:33, Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
> > Keith Antoine lamented:
> > >I have had problems with Suse and printing, unfortunately your hint
> > > didn't work either.
> >
> > Try turboprint. Use it with the "Generic UNIX LPD p
On Monday 28 Jan 2002 02:33, Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
> Keith Antoine lamented:
> >I have had problems with Suse and printing, unfortunately your hint
> > didn't work either.
>
> Try turboprint. Use it with the "Generic UNIX LPD print system"
> http://www.turboprint.de/
> Turboprint will add tp0.
Here's the story...it has me stumped.
I have a hosting provider handling my domain and email hosting.
I can't reach them from home (Rogers Cable ex @home consortium), but I
can reach them from anywhere else. When I run traceroutes I make it to
within one host of the machine I am heading for...
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:12:42 -0500 "Douglas J Hunley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a process or two that are listed as and are owned by
> init. It was my understanding that these types of processes would get
> init as their parent, and periodically init would scan its children
> and remov
Mandrake (via SlashDot) has announced that the beta ISOs for 8.2 are now
available. I know I'm going to check it out!
Tyler
PS: Map Update: I should have the Member Map ready by Wednesday! If anybody
thinks they didn't get through, post your name and location here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
--- Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Net Llama wrote:
> > My understanding is that defunct processes are zombies, and can't be
> > cleaned up with a reboot.
>
> Do you mean can't be cleaned up *without* a reboot?
> Under AIX, defuncts process can only be cleaned up by a reboot, AFAIK.
Ye
Net Llama wrote:
> My understanding is that defunct processes are zombies, and can't be
> cleaned up with a reboot.
Do you mean can't be cleaned up *without* a reboot?
Under AIX, defuncts process can only be cleaned up by a reboot, AFAIK.
Tim
___
L
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 10:18:53AM -0800, Net Llama wrote:
>My understanding is that defunct processes are zombies, and can't be
>cleaned up with a reboot.
Anything can be cleared with a reboot.
Zombie processes are generally children that have been forked
from a parent process where the child p
My understanding is that defunct processes are zombies, and can't be
cleaned up with a reboot.
--- Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a process or two that are listed as and are owned by
> init.
> It was my understanding that these types of processes would get init
> as their
I have a process or two that are listed as and are owned by init.
It was my understanding that these types of processes would get init as their
parent, and periodically init would scan its children and remove the defunct
ones. These processes seem to be hanging around. They don't respond to kil
On Monday 28 January 2002 12:58 pm, Lee wrote:
> Recently a friend saw a preview of Linux on the Tech tv channel. He was
> particularly impressed with the portion devoted to GIMP and he asked me
> to install my version of SuSe 7.2 on his box. He likes Linux, but has a
> problem that I am not famil
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 12:58:07PM -0500, Lee wrote:
>Recently a friend saw a preview of Linux on the Tech tv channel. He was
>particularly impressed with the portion devoted to GIMP and he asked me
>to install my version of SuSe 7.2 on his box. He likes Linux, but has a
>problem that I am not fam
Recently a friend saw a preview of Linux on the Tech tv channel. He was
particularly impressed with the portion devoted to GIMP and he asked me
to install my version of SuSe 7.2 on his box. He likes Linux, but has a
problem that I am not familiar with as I don't use Gimp much. Once Gimp
has been o
January 2002
===
28th
FTP -> Servers -> ProFTPD (Chang)
25th
Bind 9 -> clarifications on the secret key needed for rndc (Douglas Hunley)
21st
FREEBSD (Added to Left Menu)
FREEBSD -> Intro to FreeBSD (C.Richey)
20th
WAR
On Friday 25 January 2002 09:25 am, Tom Wilson wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:26:22 -0800
>
>
>
> Although it irks me, it doesn't irk me that much as to write a letter to
> the Dean with cc's to my government representatives
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:02:43 -0500
dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2002 10:26, Myles Green wrote:
>
> | Errmm... not really a piece of cake :( I installed CVSup lastnight
> | 'cuz the cvs commands listed on the xfree86 site refused to work
> | here for me. CVSup worked well
On Monday 28 January 2002 10:26, Myles Green wrote:
| Errmm... not really a piece of cake :( I installed CVSup lastnight
| 'cuz the cvs commands listed on the xfree86 site refused to work
| here for me. CVSup worked well, brought down everything I was
| looking for - but it won't build in it's c
On Monday 28 January 2002 10:14 am, Mike Andrew wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:59, Dallam Wych wrote:
> > In what context are you saying that winmodems cannot respond to AT
> > commands? Certainly they must respond to AT commands if they
> > communicate through wvdial as there are several command
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:33:10 -0500
dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> greetings.
>
> the crosspost is because this will perhaps be of interest to
> everybody. a couple hours ago i did a cvs harvest from xfree, it
> having been noted that the release 4.2 had a couple of fairly
> gruesome bugs wh
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:59, Dallam Wych wrote:
> In what context are you saying that winmodems cannot respond to AT
> commands? Certainly they must respond to AT commands if they
> communicate through wvdial as there are several commands involved in
> the process.
Ooops. When I'm wrong, I like to
IIIR you don't need it. I have an Asus 7700 (GF based card) and I had the
same thing. I commented it out. The i810 is only for the Intel i810 video
chip.
Michael Hipp wrote:
> Caldera 3.1 is reporting failure of "agpgart.o" on bootup. Dexktop/LX (aka
> Redmond Linux) seems to load it ok. Bo
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:42, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Another one to keep in mind is Borland, with the kylix thing being updated
> to c++. Shouldn't be too long, and I've used C++Builder on Windows with
> great pleasure.
I don't know C++Builder is it Borland? And are you saying kylix is being
ported o
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Anselmi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: ISO image files
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
> > The command I use to burn a cd from an iso image is:
> > cdrecord -v speed=4 dev=0,0,0 -data fi
28th
FTP -> Servers -> ProFTPD (Chang)
--
Linux SxS [http://sxs.webhop.net]
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Caldera 3.1 is reporting failure of "agpgart.o" on bootup. Dexktop/LX (aka
Redmond Linux) seems to load it ok. Both have this identical line in
/etc/modules/conf:
# I810 graphics:
alias char-major-10-175 agpgart
I'm running GeForce2 MX200 agp video. Caldera is xfree 4.0.2c (beta
unsupported)
Kurt Wall wrote:
>>--- Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>My take on the whole affair is that Intel is making sure it's new P4
>>>is properly supported... in that its' new optimizaions are being
>>>exploited by this compiler. That said... I'll find out shortly if
>>>its' worth the salt
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:41:15 -0800 (PST) "Net Llama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My take on the whole affair is that Intel is making sure it's new P4
> > is properly supported... in that its' new optimizaions are being
> > exploited by this compil
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 11:14:32PM +1130, Mike Andrew wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:45, zohar wrote:
> > I want to know how to distinguish between
> [snippety hack]
> > system) and AT commands of it to use for that.
> There's the rub. Winmodems of any kind CANNOT respond to AT commands. They
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:25:40 -0500
patrick kapturkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| There is no more oracle's version for Unixware 7.11.
| The last version was Oracle8 v.8.0.4.
| There'll be no version for OpenUnix because you may install
| linux version on it (sic Oracle).
| I want absolutely
44 matches
Mail list logo
