I've forwarded this on to Apache infrastructure. I asked about this
once before and the response was to be patient and let things propagate
- though something is amiss.
Erik
On Feb 20, 2005, at 10:00 AM, John Haxby wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Yes, I'm also experiencing spotty DNS issues
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Yes, I'm also experiencing spotty DNS issues with lucene.apache.org -
I can browse to it through the web, but my e-mail server cannot send
to the new e-mail lists (for svn commits and PMC only right now).
Shouldn't DNS updates be quicker than this? It's been a week since it
Yes, I'm also experiencing spotty DNS issues with lucene.apache.org - I
can browse to it through the web, but my e-mail server cannot send to
the new e-mail lists (for svn commits and PMC only right now).
Shouldn't DNS updates be quicker than this? It's been a week since it
was set up.
Henri Yandell wrote:
On names, Lucene Java might hit trademark issues I guess. So potential
worry there.
Good point. Although I note that Apache already has projects called
"Xerces Java" and "Xalan Java". Sun says:
http://www.sun.com/policies/trademarks/#20c
So, technically, the fullname of the
I'll happily change the Jakarta site whenever you're ready.
On names, Lucene Java might hit trademark issues I guess. So potential
worry there.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
Hey all, I can only suggest what we do at Apache Logging Services that
seems to work well for us. Have seperate user & dev list for each sub
product (so a user and dev for Lucene for Java, or what ever), have a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for discussions that are relevant
to all sub-product
I'm with Garrett. I think we do need a top level dev@ list for
discussion of cross-port issues, like index format and compatibility,
etc. We also need per-port and per-app lists.
Otis
--- Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Cutting wrote:
> > Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >
> >> I've am
Doug Cutting wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I've amended my request for e-mail lists here with Doug's preference:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-195
Do others agree this is the best approach? I don't mean to be
autocratic. Do we imagine different pools of users and developers for
d
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I've amended my request for e-mail lists here with Doug's preference:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-195
Do others agree this is the best approach? I don't mean to be
autocratic. Do we imagine different pools of users and developers for
different Lucene sub-p
On Feb 14, 2005, at 4:12 PM, Bernhard Messer wrote:
It seems that everything is fine now with the website :-)
I noticed the /java/docs/api area is fine too now that the DNS seems to
be working again.
Just let me know when you're ok with me turning the redirect back on
from jakarta.
Erik
It seems that everything is fine now with the website :-)
Bernhard
On Feb 14, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Bernhard Messer wrote:
Doug, you placed a copy of the website in the "java" directory. In
both, the original and the java directory the "api" directory is
missing. I can't copy it
On Feb 14, 2005, at 2:33 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Bernhard Messer wrote:
Doug, you placed a copy of the website in the "java" directory. In
both, the original and the java directory the "api" directory is
missing. I can't copy it into because of the access rights :-(
Argh. The group protection is
On Feb 14, 2005, at 2:21 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
And we also want to try not to break URLs when we move things. For
this reason it's best to move things as few tims as possible, so that
we don't end up with a confusing set of redirects.
More to the point, we also want to try
I have updated the redirects a bit more and the old /docs links now
redirect to the corresponding spot on lucene.apache.org/java/docs.
Let me know if there are any old links not redirecting appropriately.
I changed things down one level from where Doug checked them out. So
its now /java/docs,
Doug Cutting schrieb:
Bernhard Messer wrote:
Doug, you placed a copy of the website in the "java" directory. In
both, the original and the java directory the "api" directory is
missing. I can't copy it into because of the access rights :-(
Argh. The group protection is 'lucene', as it should be
Bernhard Messer wrote:
Doug, you placed a copy of the website in the "java" directory. In both,
the original and the java directory the "api" directory is missing. I
can't copy it into because of the access rights :-(
Argh. The group protection is 'lucene', as it should be, but you're not
in 'l
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Agreed. Java Lucene is a subproject of the Lucene TLP, leaving the
existing Java Lucene site there for the time being seems ok, just so
we have something there, but we should endeavour to put up something
more permanent ASA
Doug Cutting wrote:
And we also want to try not to break URLs when we move things. For this
reason it's best to move things as few tims as possible, so that we
don't end up with a confusing set of redirects.
More to the point, we also want to try not to break email addresses. So
the fewer time
Doug Cutting schrieb:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
It also might be a good time to think about mailing list names.
There was a request on infrastructure@ to move [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], would it make more sense to move it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NOW you tell me :)
I think until we have
Erik Hatcher wrote:
It also might be a good time to think about mailing list names. There
was a request on infrastructure@ to move [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], would it make more sense to move it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NOW you tell me :)
I think until we have these elusive other l
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:39 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Agreed. Java Lucene is a subproject of the Lucene TLP, leaving the
existing Java Lucene site there for the time being seems ok, just so
we have something there, but we should endeavour to put up somethi
Doug Cutting wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Agreed. Java Lucene is a subproject of the Lucene TLP, leaving the
existing Java Lucene site there for the time being seems ok, just so
we have something there, but we should endeavour to put up something
more permanent ASAP.
I think, for the present,
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Agreed. Java Lucene is a subproject of the Lucene TLP, leaving the
existing Java Lucene site there for the time being seems ok, just so we
have something there, but we should endeavour to put up something more
permanent ASAP.
I think, for the present, http://lucene.apache.
Doug Cutting wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I have checked out our current site to the lucene.apache.org area,
and I've also set up a redirect from the jakarta.apache.org/lucene area.
Keep in mind, there are two projects here:
1. Porting Java Lucene's site to Forrest. This should be structured as
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I have checked out our current site to the lucene.apache.org area, and
I've also set up a redirect from the jakarta.apache.org/lucene area.
Keep in mind, there are two projects here:
1. Porting Java Lucene's site to Forrest. This should be structured as
a sub-project of luce
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Bernhard Messer wrote:
Erik Hatcher schrieb:
I have checked out our current site to the lucene.apache.org area,
and I've also set up a redirect from the jakarta.apache.org/lucene
area.
Things are redirecting fine for me. Let me know if you encounter any
issues,
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Doug - do you have your Forest work handy? Or has anyone else stepped
up to build the web site?
I don't have anything reusable. I converted Nutch from a different (not
Anakia) XML-based site to Forrest with little difficulty (mostly using
string replace in Emacs).
I start
Erik Hatcher schrieb:
I have checked out our current site to the lucene.apache.org area,
and I've also set up a redirect from the jakarta.apache.org/lucene area.
Things are redirecting fine for me. Let me know if you encounter any
issues, but also be patient in case the DNS updates for
luce
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I have checked out our current site to the lucene.apache.org area, and
I've also set up a redirect from the jakarta.apache.org/lucene area.
Things are redirecting fine for me. Let me know if you encounter any
issues, but also be patient in case the DNS updates for
lucene
I have checked out our current site to the lucene.apache.org area, and
I've also set up a redirect from the jakarta.apache.org/lucene area.
Things are redirecting fine for me. Let me know if you encounter any
issues, but also be patient in case the DNS updates for
lucene.apache.org have not
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:11 AM, Kelvin Tan wrote:
I'm happy to help, but I haven't been keeping track of this thread..
What needs to be done, and how can I help?
The idea is to Forrest-ize the Lucene site, rather than using
jakarta-site2 and anakia. Doug said he's worked with Forrest some and
t
I'm happy to help, but I haven't been keeping track of this thread.. What needs
to be done, and how can I help?
k
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:37:38 -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> We now have lucene.apache.org mapped, yet we don't have a site
> there yet.
>
> Doug - do you have your Forest work handy?
32 matches
Mail list logo