On 2018-02-16, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:27:30PM +, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > >> Is there a chance, to test the lyx2lyx output with LyX 2.2, 2.1
>> > >> and maybe even 1.6?
>> > >
>> > > I don't think so. Remember, we only test with executables just created.
>> >
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:27:30PM +, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > >> Is there a chance, to test the lyx2lyx output with LyX 2.2, 2.1 and
> > >> maybe
> > >> even 1.6?
> > >
> > > I don't think so. Remember, we only test with executables just created.
> >
> > This is a pity. We should, at t
Am Freitag, 16. Februar 2018 09:32:39 CET schrieb Guenter Milde
:
> On 2018-02-15, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 17:26:47 CET schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
> >> We found and fixed some problems with the new test.
> >> However, there are still problems that go undetected:
> >>
On 2018-02-15, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 17:26:47 CET schrieb Guenter Milde
>> We found and fixed some problems with the new test.
>> However, there are still problems that go undetected:
>> * We currently do not test, whether a backported file can be opened by the
>>
Am Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 17:26:47 CET schrieb Guenter Milde
:
> On 2018-01-22, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I expanded the lyx2lyx test so, the an error is emitted at 10th
> > repeated run to export lyx16x.
> >
> > If two consecutive created lyx-files are identical, the test stops
> > without err
On 2018-01-22, Kornel Benko wrote:
> I expanded the lyx2lyx test so, the an error is emitted at 10th
> repeated run to export lyx16x.
> If two consecutive created lyx-files are identical, the test stops
> without error. if a created lyx-file is not loadable, test stops with
> error.
We found and