Hi,
I upgrade only when i need to, or when a version is done, to buy CD
& give money to the project.
So twice a year maximum, but most often on spring version once a year
>
> From: Peter N. M. Hansteen
> Sent: Tue Jul 12 08:25:18 CEST 2011
> To: Kenneth R
Kenneth R Westerback writes:
> You don't have to install anything. And if you upgrade only when
> you 'have' to, I recommend you track -current, which has a clear
> requirement that if you haven't upgraded today, you are no longer
> running -current. Thus you 'have' to upgrade every day.
Well, t
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick keshishian wrote:
>
> you failed at making any point.
i'll rebrand it into convenient twitter format:
debian splits packages to the point where a single service is a
associated to a single top level package, meaning that there's never a
reason for unused
On 07/11/11 20:52, STeve Andre' wrote:
On 07/11/11 18:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-11, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
It looks like it hangs in devel/libsigsegv but its not resolved by
reverting art@ KERNEL_LOCK()/KERNEL_UNLOCK() as guenther@ says a few
hours ago. I compiled kernel again post
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 09:42:10PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> You don't have to install anything. And if you upgrade only when
> you 'have' to, I recommend you track -current, which has a clear
> requirement that if you haven't upgraded today, you are no longer
> running -current. Thus y
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:40 PM, patrick keshishian
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Andres Perera
>>>
>>> why would you install a daemon and not run it? how is it any different
>>> than X listening on localhost by default in o
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:40 PM, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Andres Perera
>>
>> why would you install a daemon and not run it? how is it any different
>> than X listening on localhost by default in obsd?
>
> Just because you install something doesn't mean you wan
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:46 PM, J Sisson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Juan Miscaro wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 July 2011 15:06, jirib wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where installed daemons are running by default,
>>> > where
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:25:53AM -0700, lancebaynes87 wrote:
> This is starting to get funny.
Way ahead of you.
>
> The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
> different versions security support time.
There is no 'security' support time. There is 'support time'
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, J Sisson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
>>
>> why would you install a daemon and not run it? how is it any different
>> than X listening on localhost by default in obsd? if you install a
>> daemon in debian/ubuntu and it listens on
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> why would you install a daemon and not run it? how is it any different
> than X listening on localhost by default in obsd? if you install a
> daemon in debian/ubuntu and it listens on 0.0.0.0 by default, the
> package isn't following distro
On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Jacob L. Leifman wrote:
> Environment:
> - OpenBSD 4.9, stock (base) apache with self-signed certificate
> - behind a SOHO NAT router (with relevant in-bound redirects)
>
> Problem: non-local SSL connections never complete the handshake
> (verified while monitoring the
Hi,
One guess would be the SSL certificate is for your internal hostname,
not your external hostname. Those connecting to the external hostname,
reject the connection because the hostname doesn't match the
certificate. To use both internal and external names you have to create
certificate und
On 07/11/11 18:57, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-07-11, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
It looks like it hangs in devel/libsigsegv but its not resolved by
reverting art@ KERNEL_LOCK()/KERNEL_UNLOCK() as guenther@ says a few
hours ago. I compiled kernel again post his commit and its still
hanging.
Are y
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:46 PM, J Sisson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Juan Miscaro wrote:
>
>> On 7 July 2011 15:06, jirib wrote:
>>
>> Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where installed daemons are running by default,
>> > where there is no command to disable shitty upstart daemons?
>>
>> W
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Juan Miscaro wrote:
> On 7 July 2011 15:06, jirib wrote:
>
> Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where installed daemons are running by default,
> > where there is no command to disable shitty upstart daemons?
>
> Which daemons are those again?
>
> apt-get install
Oh look
On 7 July 2011 15:06, jirib wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:02:08 -0400
> Juan Miscaro wrote:
>
>> Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
>> distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition).
>
> Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where installed daemons are running by default,
> wher
On 2011-07-11, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>
> It looks like it hangs in devel/libsigsegv but its not resolved by
> reverting art@ KERNEL_LOCK()/KERNEL_UNLOCK() as guenther@ says a few
> hours ago. I compiled kernel again post his commit and its still
> hanging.
Are you certain your tree is up-to-date?
Environment:
- OpenBSD 4.9, stock (base) apache with self-signed certificate
- behind a SOHO NAT router (with relevant in-bound redirects)
Problem: non-local SSL connections never complete the handshake
(verified while monitoring the interface with tcpdump, see below)
During troubleshooting I
>> Since the past few days, I can't get anything to build with dpb. The
>> machine locks up in a hanged state with no response. I have to
>> forcibly power off.
>
> What was it building at the time?
dpb was building www/amaya/browser and its related dependencies. When
I try to get to that folder a
On Monday, July 11, 2011, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> Since the past few days, I can't get anything to build with dpb. The
> machine locks up in a hanged state with no response. I have to
> forcibly power off.
What was it building at the time?
> This started happening post c2k11 changes.
>
> amd64,
Hi,
Since the past few days, I can't get anything to build with dpb. The
machine locks up in a hanged state with no response. I have to
forcibly power off.
This started happening post c2k11 changes.
amd64, GENERIC.MP compiled from source. Tried the amd64 July 10th
snapshot and its the same resul
Solicita la informacion completa e Inscribase si tiene interes en
participar.
Necesitamos reunir un minimo de participantes para impartir este Curso.
CURSO TALLER
Procesos de seleccion exitosos con pruebas psicometricas
Duracion: (2 dias) 16 hrs.
Costo: $5,400 pesos mas IVA
Beneficios:
- El p
On 2011-07-11, Miguel Almeida wrote:
> Hello all. This is the first time I'm posting to this mailing list so I'll
> briefly introduce myself: I'm Miguel Almeida, I live in Portugal, I work as an
> independent consultant, I've been using OpenBSD for less than a year (on two
> of my own servers) and
Hello all. This is the first time I'm posting to this mailing list so I'll
briefly introduce myself: I'm Miguel Almeida, I live in Portugal, I work as an
independent consultant, I've been using OpenBSD for less than a year (on two
of my own servers) and, well, to end this short intro, I'll say I've
On 2011-07-11, lancebaynes87 wrote:
> This is starting to get funny.
>
> The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
> different versions security support time.
>
> How long does a version get's security support?
>
> If I install a version of OpenBSD then when do I hav
lancebaynes87 writes:
> The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
> different versions security support time.
well, a little bit into http://www.openbsd.org/security.html you will
find this snippet:
"OpenBSD 4.7 and earlier releases are not supported anymore. The
fo
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:25:53AM -0700, lancebaynes87 wrote:
> This is starting to get funny.
>
> The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
> different versions security support time.
No kidding? http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors
You are linked directly
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:25 AM, lancebaynes87 wrote:
> The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
> different versions security support time.
>
> Surprisingly, people expect to use the worlds most secure OS without
reading anything about it. (hint: no OS will save you
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, lancebaynes87 wrote:
> This is starting to get funny.
Pretty funny indeed, now we see people installing an OS and they don't
even know how to read... http://www.openbsd.org/faq/index.html
> The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the
> different
This is starting to get funny.
The worlds most secure os, and it doesn't have any docs regarding the different
versions security support time.
How long does a version get's security support?
If I install a version of OpenBSD then when do I have to upgrade to a fresher
version??
E.g.:
If I
31 matches
Mail list logo
