Thomas Schoeller wrote:
this will not work. ipsec will not encap packets that not belong to a
flow.
you need a second ipsec flow like on GW B:
ike esp from LAN_B/24 to vendor/18 peer OPENBSD_A_External
and on GW A:
ike esp from VENDOR/18 to LAN_B/24 peer OPENBSD_B_External
and then a route on GW
On 10/7/07, Jona Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:21:59 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter N. M. Hansteen) wrote:
>
> > Jona Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I can see X redraw the screen top down very slowly when I use the
> > > SMP kernel on my Thinkpad T60.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi list,
myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
discussion on 'how much RAM is supported' [0] I decided to
i) write this email to see if there's more
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi list,
>
> myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> 16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
> discussion on 'how much
Shawn K. Quinn skrev:
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 13:47 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Linux will use an extended partition, but I'm not sure if it can boot
from one, nor do I know if a boot loader will extract it and boot from
there (and I suspect there will be vendor-specific BIOS questions,
too).
That'
Salut,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:14:05AM +, mickey wrote:
> > myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> > 16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
> > discussion on 'how much RAM is supported' [0] I decided to
>
> PAE support has alread
On 2007-10-06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *The* way to make encrypted disks on OpenBSD is through vnconfig -k.
> Go read up on that and come back.
> Then here's what you can do (it's dead simple):
> # vnconfig -k svnd0 /path/to/image
> # mount /dev/svnd0 /home
>
> #note: the image
Hi,
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:12:16 -0400
stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a new laptop that I would like to set up to have 4 different OS's
> on. The OS's I would like to install are:
>
> OpenBSD
> FreeBSD
> Linux
> Windows (XP r Vista)
>
> Is it possible to do this on the one disk. I do h
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:14:05AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> > > 16GByte RAM) for a customer that run OpenBSD *and* having seen (again) a
> > > discuss
Salut,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:44:48AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > PAE is slow and has hairy paws. I am glad that we have real amd64
machines
> > > now so we don't need it anymore.
>
> besides that what do you think amd64 runs? (:
> it uses the same pae as i386. and it is not any faster.
> learn
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:43:25AM +, mickey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> > Salut,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:14:05AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > > myself in need to build some big, phat machines (8GByte, or even
> > > > 16GByte RAM) for a
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:53:50AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:44:48AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > > PAE is slow and has hairy paws. I am glad that we have real amd64
> > > > machines
> > > > now so we don't need it anymore.
> >
> > besides that what do
Salut,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:22AM +, mickey wrote:
> or what you think loading 36bit physaddr is slower than loading 48bits?
I think that loading 48-bits in one step is faster than loading 36-bit
in two. It is also a matter of experience that amd64 memory access is
way faster than i38
You don't get the problem, at least if you run a decent operating
system, 'cause I know some people having problem using more than 4 Gig
of ram, even with AMD64 or EM64T hardware, and (hum) Vista.
Just to say the arch does not make everything, a good software is also needed.
plus, X86_64 gets rid
Salut,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:15:27AM +, mickey wrote:
> > I think that loading 48-bits in one step is faster than loading 36-bit
> > in two. It is also a matter of experience that amd64 memory access is
> > way faster than i386 with PAE.
>
> why do you think that tlb loader cannot load 64
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:13:55PM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> Salut,
>
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:02:22AM +, mickey wrote:
> > or what you think loading 36bit physaddr is slower than loading 48bits?
>
> I think that loading 48-bits in one step is faster than loading 36-bit
> in two. I
On Monday 08 October 2007 12:02:22 mickey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:53:50AM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD wrote:
> > Salut,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:44:48AM +, mickey wrote:
> > > > > PAE is slow and has hairy paws. I am glad that we have real amd64
> > > > > machines now so we do
OK guys,
Instead of fighting about using, or not using it, or i386 being
obsolete, PAE not being good, or slow, etc.
I for one would be very happy if we can support more then 4GB of memory
on it and I would be more then happy to test it as I now have machine
that actually have more then 4GB
Any Twiki admins having this problem?:
When editing a page RCS errors are shown in the browser, but the page is
updated fine without any changelog. Browser displays this:
Attention
Topic save error
During save of file TWiki.WebHome an error was found by the version
control system. Please notify
On 10/8/07, Alexey Vatchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-10-06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > #note: the image file should be available somewhere that isn't /home,
> > obviously... you may be able to have a /home with it on there and then
> > mount over that and it migh
Theo de Raadt wrote:
And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
Gifts from the "water chicken" no doubt.
As usual, OpenBSD marches to the sound of its own drum :-))
Nice one.
On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11
and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of
ASCII ! and U. But I
Hi guys,
I ask at misc because I#m unsure if these problems are known.
During reading the CHangelog I noticed the ALC883 Chip was added to Azalia.
Well this Chip is at this Motherboard but I can't get it working.
The BIOS supports to either set it into the HDA Mode or into the AC97
mode. neither
I think it should have been 101 instead of 11. But if it's not
than it's a good easter egg :-p (and I don't get it).
ropers wrote:
On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
Okay, I can't be
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:55:11AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
> And there's a few easter eggs
> hidden in the song as well. It also explains the inside sleeve
> image...
Someone is giving it a go:
http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027
Gord
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/10/04 17:48, Florin Andrei wrote:
All firewall rules are written as stateless as possible - I don't need
stateful filtering, the setup is very simple (allow HTTP inbound, allow a
few ICMP types, and that's it).
congestion116169
On 10/8/07, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
>
> Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11
> and 1010101 stood for decimal
And of course,
1001001
011
1010101
lacks the sexual innuendo, but it's a super nice thing to tell your
one and only. :)
--ropers
> >> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>> And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
> >
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:43 AM, ropers wrote:
> > Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11
> > and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of
> > ASCII ! and
On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it should have been 101 instead of 11.
Gord wrote:
> Someone is giving it a go:
> http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027
That's real interesting, guys.
TheRaven64 writes that (0)11 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 02:26 -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
> On Sunday 07 October 2007 14:08, Nick Guenther wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have a new laptop that I would like to set up to have 4 different OS's
>
Got that working. I would suggest to start with most compl
Florin Andrei wrote:
I expected OpenBSD 4.1 to do better. But the thing is, even without the
UDP flood, the OpenBSD firewall is very slow. I am downloading a huge
file through it, via HTTP, and all I get is 4 Mbyte / sec. With Linux I
get 112 Mbyte / sec.
Something's wrong. Or I'm doing som
Perhaps: Regarding "...these are ! and U..."
As in "not equal to proprietary"
(UNIX=$? unix=free?)
Or in other words, "free"
(I'm a newbie in the Unix-world so my apologies if I'm confusing free vs $ with
UNIX vs unix/unix-like.)
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED
>>> Christoph Egger 8-Oct-07 12:54 >>>
>
> in legacy mode, there is i386 that support 4KB and 4MB page-sizes and
> use 2-level pagetables.
> in legacy mode, there is i386 PAE that support 4KB and 2MB page-sizes
> and use 3-level pagetables.
>
> in long mode, there is amd64 that support 4KB, 2MB an
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:23:42PM +0300, Timo Myyrd wrote:
> Which would be a better method, the separate image or encrypt whole
> partition and how to encrypt whole partition on OpenBSD?
in -current its possible to encrypt partitions through the use of
svnds with vnconfig:
(example)
# vnconf
Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
> AMD64 or EM64T machine with 8GB+ of RAM (or $1700 to buy one) needed in
> Edmonton. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having the hardware will help some. I've got access to some larger
hardware here at the university, and have sent out the large mem diff
for amd64 machines. I
I am running the Sept 24 snapshot. I've never tried to make a release
with a snapshot before and so I wonder whether it's possible. I
updated my sources with cvsup (tag=OPENBSD_42) and keep getting a
crash:
install: addftinfo/addftinfo.cat1: No such file or directory
*** Error code 71
Stop in /
On 10/8/07, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still can't match the performance I get from Linux. Any suggestion is
> appreciated.
there were in the past postings on this list about problems with quad-port
em NICs. I am absolutely not in a position to tell whether they are relevant
for
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x52 DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC25100CL5
CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does "PC25100" mean here? :)
Thanks.
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does "PC25100" mean here? :)
PC2-5100
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 12:26:28AM +0300, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x52 DDR2 SDRAM non-parity PC25100CL5
>
> CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does "PC25100" mean here? :)
>
> Thanks.
It seems the code was incorrectly using "PC2" as a prefix
i
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:04:15 +0200, ropers wrote:
>On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it should have been 101 instead of 11.
>
>Gord wrote:
>> Someone is giving it a go:
>> http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027
>
>That's real interesting, guys.
>TheRa
On 10/6/07, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to specify the kernel that the hardware for which there are
> drivers probing for but I don't have in my PC is absent? Since OBSD has no
> suspend to disk/RAM, the bootup speed is critical when working with a laptop
> in public t
Nothing gets any nerdier than this, O - M - G. *thinks of revenge of the nerds*
On 10/6/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just back from my (hiking) trip, I am happy to announce the 4.2
> song has been added to the lyrics page at
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
>
> Yes,
Hi all,
I am an OpenBSD newbie (although I have used Linux before), so please bear
with me. I successfully installed OpenBSD on a machine that has a fixed IP.
I would like to install an HTTP proxy. The goal is to be able to allow a
friend who has to go to China to surf the web freely. Do you have
knitti wrote:
there were in the past postings on this list about problems with quad-port
em NICs. I am absolutely not in a position to tell whether they are relevant
for this situation. If I remember correctly, there was a problem with TCP
checksum offloading, and a suggested fix in one instanc
Tony Bruguier wrote:
...
> I would like to install an HTTP proxy.
...
Squid is recommended. Read the directions carefully and you will have
to make one or two changes to the configuration.
Have squid listen localhost and then tunnel to get to it.
> ...
> In the long term, I would like to implem
Tony,
I agree with lars, squid is an excellent choice to proxy http and https.
Here are some instructions and a working example if you need them.
Squid Proxy (Secure, Paranoid and Non-caching)
http://calomel.org/squid.html
--
Calomel @ http://calomel.org
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 03:4
On 10/8/07, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The UDP flood still freezes the system solid (but I discovered that the
> system clock continues to work more or less fine, it's just the text
> console and the firewall that are not responsive).
>
> I still can't match the performance I get
Hi all,
Thanks for all the help so far. I successfully installed OpenBSD today. I
can access my machine via ssh and sftp provided I am on the same subnet. But
as soon as I go home, then I can't anymore.
Any pointers?
Tony
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-newbie--ssh-and-
Hello,
Here's more information. I did a basic install and I had some trouble with
the network (it recognized my wireless card but had trouble doing a DHCP on
the ethernet card).
I can access the machine via sftp, ssh, and ping it if I am on the same
subnet. From home, I can neither ping, nor ssh,
On Monday 08 October 2007 21:57, Tony Bruguier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for all the help so far. I successfully installed OpenBSD today. I
> can access my machine via ssh and sftp provided I am on the same subnet.
> But as soon as I go home, then I can't anymore.
>
> Any pointers?
>
> Tony
If y
On 8-Oct-07, at 8:43 PM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Tony Bruguier wrote:
...
I would like to install an HTTP proxy.
...
Squid is recommended. Read the directions carefully and you will have
to make one or two changes to the configuration.
Have squid listen localhost and then tunnel to get to it.
On 10/9/07, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Bruguier wrote:
> ...
> > I would like to install an HTTP proxy.
> ...
>
> Squid is recommended. Read the directions carefully and you will have
> to make one or two changes to the configuration.
>
> Have squid listen localhost and then tun
Hi,
I'm using TOR with good success here in China. Try torpark for
windows, this will give your friend a preconfigured package of tor +
firefox, ready to run (no need to setup a proxy on your site).
REgards
/Rob
Tony Bruguier wrote:
Hi all,
I am an OpenBSD newbie (although I have used Li
If anyone is using the festival speech synthesis system that is in ports
or any other speech synthesis system that can run on OpenBSD and you
don't mind me picking your brain, please drop me a note.
Thanks,
Jeff Ross
Hello all,
First, thanks for all the help so far. It seems that I have downloaded and
installed the 4.2 version even though it is not supposed to be available
yet. Here's the link:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/cd42.iso
I tried to install the squid for the 4.1 version but it do
On 10/7/07, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a new laptop that I would like to set up to have 4 different OS's
> on. The OS's I would like to install are:
>
> OpenBSD
> FreeBSD
> Linux
> Windows (XP r Vista)
>
> Is it possible to do this on the one disk. I do have enough space, my
> concern
On 10/6/07, Piotrek Kapczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/10/6, Cyrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm looking for a ready to install & roll package for configureing and
> > administering a OpenBSD firewall from the web. something along the lines of
> > pfSense, but with OpenBSD base.
> > Thanks,
Tony Bruguier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, thanks for all the help so far. It seems that I have downloaded and
> installed the 4.2 version even though it is not supposed to be available
> yet. Here's the link:
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/cd42.iso
that is a -current
"Siju George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) it is easier to get Windows installed on the beginning so you have
> less hassle.
I'd amplify that even further. Of the systems mentioned, only Windows
appears to work from the assumption that it will always be the only
operating system on your mach
On 2007-10-08, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you mean you have a /home partition, which contains an encrypted
> image, and then you mount the encrypted image over top of your /home?
> Because that's what I was thinking / what I think is being asked about.
I have /home partition. I
62 matches
Mail list logo